Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: Idea of 'women's issues' a lie
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 11/17/2002 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 11/17/2002 9:48:47 AM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Gritty
Ah, you got that interpretation reversed, Pelosi arguably, looks better in a bikini...at least so the raft of leftwing dingalings in the Press are so swift to tell us that she is 'gorgeous' 'beautiful' 'lovely' 'glamourous' etc. And that is just the SHORT list of adjectives they have employed. I think Steyn is right exactly on the mark to smirk over these inane irrelevancies the 'establishment' press has disgorged as 'news' content. Mark has done nothing to diminish his own gentlemanly reserve in noting this observation.
41 posted on 11/17/2002 6:20:47 PM PST by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Mark has done nothing to diminish his own gentlemanly reserve in noting this observation.

Sorry.

I should have added the */sarcasm* tag for clarity (my remark was tongue inserted deeply in cheek).

42 posted on 11/17/2002 6:29:40 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This guy rarely fails to hit a home run. Donating to FR is worth it, just to find his columns in one place.
43 posted on 11/17/2002 6:41:03 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The Dems are the party of old women. Oh, OK, ''mature'' women

Oh, I like that one. We have to start getting that one out and around.

44 posted on 11/17/2002 7:03:28 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
That's likely to prove more relevant in the two years ahead than whether she looks better in a bikini than Walter Mondale.

I could have gone the rest of my life without that image and not felt the loss. That's just irresponsible journalism.

Please put me on your Steyn ping list.

45 posted on 11/17/2002 7:29:48 PM PST by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
I ran across and bookmarked this article awhile back regarding the bogus membership numbers purported by NOW. Here's a blurb:

As Ragab notes, almost all nonprofits exaggerate their membership figures somewhat, but NOW appears to be one of the select few who take such exaggerations to outrageous levels. Ragab notes that in its 501(c) filing for 1999, NOW reported income from memberships at $2,903,383. Since a yearly individual membership to NOW costs $35, that would yield about 89,500 paying members.

Possibly less than 100,000 members and they are considered the "voice" of the American woman by the media. Yah right!

46 posted on 11/17/2002 8:29:39 PM PST by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Silly piece really. It is one of his worst, sadly. Single woman were as Dem as ever, married woman were not, and where woman won or lost was due to the partisan balance in their districts mostly, or due to having to face a strong GOP incumbent like Leach in Iowa. Overall, the gender gap did decline apparently, with men a bit more Dem, and woman quite a bit more GOP overall, but that is based on a poll, and not on the evidence Steyn adduced. This piece would have had more traction if it dealt with Dem primaries, where Emily's List struck out.
47 posted on 11/17/2002 8:35:38 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
bump
48 posted on 11/17/2002 8:58:10 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks Pokey - Another great Steyn!
49 posted on 11/17/2002 9:21:05 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
suddenly decided that there was a pressing need to discover how ''women'' were doing in this election and commanded the back-room psephologists to unearth the relevant data.

Wow, it's been a long time since I've had to crack a dictionary to look up a word I've never seen before.

pse-phol-o-gy (see fol'uh jee) n.
1. the study of elections. [1950-55; < Gk psêpho (s) pebble + - LOGY; so called from the Athenian custom of casting votes by means of pebbles]

50 posted on 11/17/2002 9:40:53 PM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks for the ping, Pokey.
51 posted on 11/17/2002 9:56:26 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
ping...Steyn is the best way to finish off the day!
52 posted on 11/17/2002 9:57:36 PM PST by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks, Pokey =^)
53 posted on 11/17/2002 11:08:45 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ...

Mark Steyn, the MASTER, MEGA PING!!


54 posted on 11/17/2002 11:09:35 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
. But the media keep yakking on about ''women's issues'' and all the other pre-9/11 trivia as if all the king's cliches and all the king's bumper stickers can put Humpty Dumpty Democrat together again.

LOL .. Thanks for the Ping John ..That was FABULOUS !!!

55 posted on 11/17/2002 11:23:05 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
You're welcome -- Mark Steyn is always -- ALWAYS -- a MUST-READ. =^)
56 posted on 11/17/2002 11:24:57 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks for another great read from the master.

There is so much truth in Mark's final statement, and the left wing media has no idea that its refusal to document what the libs are really like, is hastening the end of 1960/70's lunatic lib party.

Remind me never to complain about ''liberal media bias'' again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.

57 posted on 11/17/2002 11:35:05 PM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Hey! That's the line I liked!
58 posted on 11/18/2002 1:03:40 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"I'm not interested in the right to kill my unborn children, and I never depended on the government to feed my children or provide child care for them,"

Amelia, you're a nifty Lady.

Godspeed, the Dilg
59 posted on 11/18/2002 2:35:59 AM PST by thedilg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson