Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Allow Private Sector Bids (Wait until you hear Federal Unions SCREAM!)
Associated Press AOL Update Email | 14 Nov 2002 | R. Fournier

Posted on 11/14/2002 10:09:41 AM PST by PhiKapMom

Bush to Allow Private Sector Bids

By RON FOURNIER
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush plans to subject as many as 850,000 federal jobs to competition from the private sector, administration officials said Thursday, a sweeping reform long sought by Republicans and stiffly opposed by labor unions.

Nearly half of the government's civilian work force could be affected by the plan to be published in the Federal Register on Friday. After a 30-day public review period, Bush can impose the new rules without congressional approval.

``This is inherent to getting the taxpayers the best deal for their dollars and the best service from the government,'' said Trent Duffy, spokesman for the Office of Management and Budget.

Bush and his fellow Republicans have long favored opening public sector jobs to competition from outside government. They argue that competitive bidding will force government bureaucracies to improve service and lower costs - or lose business to the private sector.

Public employee unions are expected to fight the proposal, which could cost their rank and file jobs.

The proposal comes at the heels of last week's GOP victories in congressional elections ,which emboldened Bush and his agenda. The White House is poised to beat back union opposition to another administration initiative, this one in Congress: the creation of the Homeland Security Department.

Current federal rules allow for public-private competition, administration officials say, but the regulations are so cumbersome that private firms are often reluctant to seek government contracts.

Under the plan, ``commercial activities'' conducted by the government - from lawn mowing to hanging drywall and secretarial work - will be open to competition. There are 850,000 such jobs in the federal work force; Bush has set a goal of putting 50 percent of those jobs up for grabs in the first stage of the plan, officials said, with the intention of eventually opening the total 850,000 to competition.

Traditional high-ranking government positions would not be subject to the proposal, according to administration officials who outlined the proposal.

One reform would encourage agencies to complete competitive bid reviews within a year. Under current rules, the competitive bid process can take four years - a delay that scares off private sector bids, officials said.

Rules under which the government buys goods and services will be streamlined to allow for more competitive bidding, officials said.

The Government Accounting Office has determined that public-private competition will save taxpayers 30 percent on each contract.

Expecting opposition from public employees unions, administration officials argue that the initiative would encourage unions to compete and win contracts; it does not mandate that the private sector takeover the jobs.

Bush picked this new fight with federal unions one day after it became clear that he had won another battle with them. With Republicans ready to take full control of Congress, Democrats were largely abandoning their demands for union protections at the new Department of Homeland Security.

The House easily passed a bill that would establish the department on Wednesday, and the Senate was ready to follow suit.

11/14/02 12:58 EST


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: accountability; federalemployees; hehehe; nothappy; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Orangedog
Well, as pKmom said, it's really Section 8a -- but it is the same. A racist, sexist set aside built into the law.
41 posted on 11/14/2002 10:38:46 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
LOL!!! I spent almost 13 years working for them and that Command was the reason we have lived all over the Country.
42 posted on 11/14/2002 10:39:47 AM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Something I didn't know until recently is that Indians, Eskimos and Hawaiians have a special deal that if a contractor hires them, they contractor gets a bonus of I think 5% of the contract just for hiring their companies.

Had you heard about that one?
43 posted on 11/14/2002 10:40:54 AM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
This isn't JUST wonderful because it will save money and make government more efficient. It ALSO is brilliant politically -- it reduces the numbers in government unions and dries up a huge source of funding for the demonrats!!!!

Now, if Bush just gets tort reform passed and hoses the trial lawyers!!! (But ABCNNBCBS still thinks W is so dumb - hahahahahahahahaha)

44 posted on 11/14/2002 10:41:35 AM PST by justanotherfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
This will help the economy too. *big effin' smile crossing face as I reflect on the beauty of GOP control*

Next union surprise, strict enforcement of the Beck decision. Hehehehehe....

45 posted on 11/14/2002 10:43:10 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
What happened to all of the Bush Bashers that were complaining that nothing would change?

I'm sorta waiting for Willie Green to start moaning about all the union jobs that will be lost.

46 posted on 11/14/2002 10:46:50 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Oh boy, that's new. Well, I think I remember seeing the reimbursement forms around someplace I was at once.

My brother, Tom, suggested that my kids take middle names like "Running-Bear", or "Dancing-Butterfly" in order to get "special" treatment such as you suggest. There is some anecdotal reports that such stupid ploys do work.

47 posted on 11/14/2002 10:47:51 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Now it's AFMETCAL. We're working under an AMC (Air Mobility Command) contract. It calls for inspections every 2 months by a Blue suit team with a 95% or better passing grade on all programs. We are also certified every 3 years or so by a full-blown AFMETCAL inspection. If we fail that we're gone.
48 posted on 11/14/2002 10:49:52 AM PST by Governor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: End The Hypocrisy
Can we gloat yet? :)
49 posted on 11/14/2002 10:50:52 AM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
This works well in AFMC -- workload has improved since they are on contract. No more complacent civilians as they know their contract is tied to performance. The joint civilian/contractor mix seems to be working out from everything I have seen here at Tinker AFB. At least it is a lot better than when it was all Civil Service and they didn't worry about keeping their jobs!

Back in the mid 80's, before I retired from a defense contractor, I went on what the AF called "Logistics Tours" - one to McClellan AFB in Sacramento and the other to Warner-Robins, GA. I was flabbergasted to see the number of civilian workers sitting around with nothing to do. And one empty building after another, especially at McClellan.

You may remember McClellan. It was supposed to be closed in one of the Base Closures but Clinton violated it and kept it open. I believe that the result was keeping the work there but it is being done by private employers. I'm not sure of this.

50 posted on 11/14/2002 10:51:52 AM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Good for you. I think... smile.
51 posted on 11/14/2002 10:52:15 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dog
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=536&ncid=536&e=5&u=/ap/20021114/ap_on_go_pr_wh/shifting_government_jobs
52 posted on 11/14/2002 10:52:34 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Now it's AFMETCAL. We're working under an AMC (Air Mobility Command) contract. It calls for inspections every 2 months by a Blue suit team with a 95% or better passing grade on all programs. We are also certified every 3 years or so by a full-blown AFMETCAL inspection. If we fail that we're gone.
53 posted on 11/14/2002 10:55:24 AM PST by Governor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
then the Senate Judiciary committee approves a couple of Bush's nominees

Indeed? This is great news! Please tell me where you heard/saw this.


54 posted on 11/14/2002 10:57:17 AM PST by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Uh Oh...... look out now.... I can just hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth....

This is a payback and furtherance of the NWO, Corporate donors, moving closer to the one world government, etc. Better get someone to file some lawsuits looking at what he said and who advised him on this thing "because no one is above the law".... Yep, onward and upward and let the losers be damned..... lol.

55 posted on 11/14/2002 10:57:42 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Check out Yulista Corp........they're a NATIVE corp set up with a FED GRANT out of Alaska. They provide Maintenance and Service at a hell of a lot of Air Force bases.
Another thing , once you get in the system, you are even paid for submitting a contract bid, even if you lose.
56 posted on 11/14/2002 10:59:08 AM PST by Governor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/788961/posts?

Committee Approves Bush Nominees
57 posted on 11/14/2002 10:59:11 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
What happened to all of the Bush Bashers that were complaining that nothing would change? Seems kinda quiet around here today.

Some people have called me a Bush-basher; to be honest, I didn't expect Bush would take this step.

So here I am, giving the President credit when it's due. Hopefully he'll keep it up.

58 posted on 11/14/2002 10:59:16 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/788961/posts
59 posted on 11/14/2002 11:01:10 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Yah, me, too. I've had one since November 5th. I met a woman today whose husband is a staunch democrat and was once mayor here. She said to me, "You've changed to a Republican!" I told her when the Clinton democrats hop the train out of town, I'd reconsider (not). She agreed that they were pretty disastrous! We may win some over yet.
60 posted on 11/14/2002 11:06:01 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson