NEW!! Election Day Q ERTIES (clintons v. Bush)

Q ERTY6 _{utter failure}^bump

It has been glaringly obvious since September 11, 2001. It was confirmed on November 5, 2002. The Democrat party is in the throes of death.

It suffers from terminal obsolescence, intractable vacuity, a vertiginous, egocentric spin, and spontaneous corruption--that is to say--the Democrat party suffers from malignant clintonism.

From this it follows--no post hoc reasoning this--that the clintons and clintonism are dead. The only question left is whether a decent burial is in the offing...


Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering,
by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

IT IS OBVIOUS

By Mia T, 3-3-02

It is obvious to anyone who bothers to remove his political blinders. It is so patently obvious that even those whose political blinders are a permanently fixed fashion statement -- that is to say, even Hollywood -- can see it. (Just ask Whoopie Goldberg...or Rosie O'Donnell...) Bush's poll numbers are a reflection of this self-evident truth.

What is manifestly obvious and confirmed on a daily basis is the plain fact that Democrats are, by definition, constitutionally unfit to navigate the ship of state through these troubled, terrorist waters. Democrats were unfit pre-9/11, but few could see it then. It was 9/11 and its aftermath that made this truth crystal clear even to the most simpleminded among us.

The unwashed masses, the uninformed, the disinformed can see it now. All America can see it now. Self-preservation is kicking in, trumping petty politics at every turn.

And this is why Democrat demagoguery and stupidity and sedition are achieving new lows...

We are witnessing the last gasp of a political relic. The Democrat party is not merely obsolete. As 9/11 and clinton-clinton-Daschle action and inaction have demonstrated, the Democrat party is very dangerous.

We must now make sure that this fact, too, is obvious to all...

Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

Bill Clinton may not be the worst president America has had, but surely he is the worst person to be president.*

---GEORGE WILL, Sleaze, the sequel

Had George Will written Sleaze, the sequel (the "sequel" is, of course, hillary) after 9-11-01, I suspect that he would have had to forgo the above conceit, as the doubt expressed in the setup phrase was, from that day forward, no longer operational.

Indeed, assessing the clinton presidency an abject failure is not inconsistent with commentary coming from the left, most recently the LA Times: "Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize."

When the clintons left office, I predicted that the country would eventually learn--sadly, the hard way--that this depraved, self-absorbed and inept pair had placed America (and the world) in mortal danger. But I was thinking years, not months.

It is very significant that hillary clinton didn't deny clinton culpability for the terrorism. (Meet the Press, 12-09-01), notwithstanding tired tactics (if you can't pass the buck, spread the blame) and chronic "KnowNothing Victim Clinton" self-exclusion.

If leftist pandering keeps the disenfranchized down in perpetuity, clinton pandering,("it's the economy, stupid"), kept the middle and upper classes wilfully ignorant for eight years.

And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton covertly cooked the books even as he assiduously avoided essential actions that would have negatively impacted the economy--the ultimate source of his continued power--actions like, say, going after the terrorists.

It is critically important that hillary clinton fail in her grasp for power; read Peggy Noonan's little book, 'The Case Against Hillary Clinton' and Barbara Olson's two books; it is critical that the West de-clintonize, but that will be automatic once it is understood that the clintons risked civilization itself in order to gain and retain power.

It shouldn't take books, however, to see that a leader is a dangerous, self-absorbed sicko. People should be able to figure that out for themselves. The electorate must be taught to think, to reason. It must be able to spot spin, especially in this age of the electronic demagogue.

I am not hopeful. As Bertrand Russell noted, "Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so. "

Mia T, hillary clinton blames hubby for terrorism

(SHE knew nuttin')

Meet the Press, 12-09-01

*George Will continues: There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

Q ERTY3 co-rapist bump!

Senator Hillary Clinton, giving the principal address at Yale's commencement exercises (5/0101):

"The most important thing I have to say to you today is that hair matters. This is a life lesson my family did not teach me [and] Wellesley and Yale Law School failed to instill: Your hair will send significant messages to those around you. What hopes and dreams you have for the world - but more, what hopes and dreams you have for your hair. Pay attention to your hair, because everyone else will."

QWER•TY (kwûr'tee) adj.
Of, relating to, or designating the traditional configuration of typewriter or computer keyboard keys. [From the first six letters at the upper left.]

Q ERTY Series: The Inspiration

No Joke

Those who trashed the White House were vicious vandals, not merry pranksters.

BY TUNKU VARADARAJAN
Monday, January 29, 2001 12:01 a.m. EST
The Wall Street Journal

What is a "prank"? And when does a prank take on a darker hue and
merit, instead, a less indulgent label--such as "delinquency," or
"vandalism"?

These questions, whose answers are rooted in common sense, culture and
civilization, were raised last week by revelations first detailed on the
Internet by Matt Drudge, for whose insolent, frontiersman's approach to
newsgathering we continue to be grateful. He's not always right, and
he's not always elegant, but he bawls his tales from the rafters when
others, more timorous and more conventional, would only mince their
words, or whisper.

Although the mainstream press echoed the story only reluctantly, and
sought to draw its sting by downgrading it to the status of rumor, the
contents of the Drudge report seemed to be unquestionably consonant with
the tone, the oh-so-jarring tone, struck, in their departure from the
White House, by the Clinton cohorts--from the strutting
self-congratulation of the ex-president at Andrews Air Force Base (like
a weed, he'd taken root, and like a weed he called to be ripped from the
soil beneath him), to the stripping bare of the former Air Force One by
the ex-presidential locusts.

According to reports, outgoing Clinton-Gore staffers at the White House
performed a range of "pranks," including the prizing out from many White
House computer keyboards of the W (Dubya) key, the gluing shut of
drawers on office desks, the infecting of computers with viruses, the
recording of offensive reception messages on the answering machines, the
slashing (yes, slashing) of telephone lines, the loading of pornographic
images on printers and computers, offensive graffiti on corridors and
bathroom walls, the turning upside down of desks, and, as a valedictory
signature, the leaving of a trail of trash across the West Wing.

Mr. Drudge, the only one to quantify the damage publicly, has put the
monetary estimate--in terms of its cost to the taxpayer--at $200,000.
There is some speculation that this is a conservative estimate...

In the context of the White House, any harm or damage must be construed
to include the infliction of a burden on the taxpayer--not to mention
the interference, however temporary, with the business of government.

...the slashing of phone lines? The gluing shut of desk drawers? The
gouging out from keyboards of the W key? The infection of computers
with viruses? The redirection of official phone lines, on which the
public and government rely? These, I fear, violate the prankster's
rulebook. They caused damage; lines, desks, computers and keyboards
needed repair and replacement. My money, and yours, was used for this
repair.

Most shabby of all, however, was the perpetrators' intent. A true
prank--a prank properly defined--is carried out in a jocular spirit.
Pranks are escapades, monkeyshines. They're not acts of venom or spite,
of resentment or ill-will. If the actor is malefic, he is not a
prankster but a vandal. He is, in truth, a delinquent.

That's what I learned in grade school, and I commend that interpretation
to you.

Mr. Varadarajan is deputy editorial features editor of The Wall Street Journal. His column appears Mondays.

I would argue with Mr. Varadarajan's contention that mens rea must be considered and that the absence of malicious intent reduces the act to mere prank. Such an argument runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare.

"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools.
Let's start with typewriters."

- Frank Lloyd Wright

Someone recently tested the monkeys-on-typewriters bit trying for the plays of Will Shakespeare, but all they got were the plays of bill clinton.

clinton hunt-and-peck
Q ERTY1
Q ERTY2
Q ERTY3
Q ERTY4
Q ERTY5
Q ERTY6
Q ERTY7
Q ERTY8
Q ERTY9

Wonderful, absolutely wonderful. Had I Terry McAuliffe's $18 million from GBX, I would buy airtime and run your q erties as PSA's, Mia.

WooooooooHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Mia T ROCKS...MUD

Thank you. Is it just me or have you been MIA, Mia T?

Finally, something the DU idiots can point to when trashing FR and conservatives.

Mia T ROCKS!

AMEN, brother!

g

Bump! Nice to see you again.

Mia T, you are one bright, funny and talented lady. My hat's off to you for the quality of your work. Good to have you on FR again, now that the bandwidth-sucking election is over.

Congressman Billybob

"to Restore Trust in America"

Hi Mia Bttt

All-if you fail to click on Mia's Q ERTY 8-you will be missing a knock out punch towards bill and hill.

Mia..........Q ERTY 8 and Q ERTY 9 knocked my socks off! I truly wish the folks at the WH who had to deal with the missing W's on their computer keyboards could grab a gander at your novel commentary. I believe they would get a huge belly laugh.....you have nailed it, Mia, YOU DON'T NEED A W to define the clintons, EVER. Loved the sound effects-the bawdy crowd, the hurrahs, the children's voices-FABULOUS! The RNC could use you on their staff-your perspective and your way of sharing it is astounding, dead-on and funny, all in one big splashy presentation.

Love it!

And re-reading your 02-03-02 post was as correct in its prediction of the doomed nature of clintonism as any I have seen written anywhere. When you wrote:

The unwashed masses, the uninformed, the disinformed can see it now. All America can see it now. Self-preservation is kicking in, trumping petty politics at every turn.

And this is why Democrat demagoguery and stupidity and sedition are achieving new lows...,

you could not have known, as you said, that it would be merely months, not years, for their vile legacy to impact our nation so very brutally. It certainly has. And the failed clinton MO is being exposed with tremendous clarity (and yeah, 9/11 was the catalyst, I agree).

People are turning from them in droves...BIG TIME!

Great, great vision, Mia, super commentary with dead-on graphics to burn your point home.

You go girl.....you are a classic!

Well done, Mia T BUMP.

Good to see ya, Miz G!!

Utmost FReegards...MUD

A thanks for the ping, ping.

These are the best QWERTYS yet! Gold star to QWERTY 9. We need an Academy/Oscar type award for you.

Jen

thx. :)

Defining the clintons and clintonism: Nov. 5, 2002 and Q ERTY

by Mia T | November 13, 2002

How cheerfully he seems to grin,
How neatly spreads his claws,

And welcomes little fishes in
With gently smiling jaws!

~Alice's Adventures in Wonderland

The irony of the clinton Keyboard Caper, the inspiration for my Q ERTY SERIES, is that whereas we "didn't need those Ws to define the clintons," it was precisely a "W" -- Dubya -- who finally defined the clintons and clintonism.

Because he did so by counterexample, Dubya accomplished this feat with exquisite -- and seemingly effortless -- precision, subtlety and brilliance.

Dubya's love defined clinton hate Dubya's courage defined clinton cowardice Dubya's character defined clinton corruption Dubya's plain talk defined clinton doublespeak Dubya's competence defined clinton ineptitude Dubya's unselfconsciousness defined clinton solipsism and self-aggrandizement Dubya's selflessness defined clinton egocentricity, self-protection and self-enrichment Dubya's morality defined clinton deconstruction and subversion Dubya's charity defined clinton greed Dubya's straightforwardness defined clinton sleight of hand Dubya's reverence defined clinton rapacity Dubya's inventiveness defined clinton rigidity and devastation Dubya's humility defined clinton megalomania Dubya's focus defined clinton aimlessness Dubya's leadership defined clinton poll-following demagoguery Dubya's inclusiveness defined clinton balkanizing Dubya's compassion defined clinton intolerance Dubya's principles defined clinton expediency Dubya's prudence defined clinton recklessness Dubya's sanity defined clinton dysfunction Dubya's patriotism defined clinton sedition Dubya's loyalty defined clinton perfidy Dubya's brilliance defined clinton banality Dubya's greatness defined clinton smallness

Historians will record that Dubya's definition of the clintons and clintonism was formalized by the people on November 5, 2002.

Don't bet on it. Peronism still exists in Argentina.

LOL-Hillary was ripe for corruption. And she became the queen of the game. Her 'heinous' is trying, with all of her might, to negate the legacy she and her bawdy husband (in name only, of course) built while defiling our White House. Mia's contrasts of President Bush and billy hit home (post #17) don't they?

I would so enjoy hearing Rush or Sean read this to their massive radio audiences. It so explains the joy, the blessings so many of us feel.

My goodness-if ever there was a right time in the history of our nation for a man like President Bush, it was the last presidential election. Night became day-the differences between these two humans was that stark.