Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

*SECURITY COUNCIL VOTES 15-0 TO ADOPT U.S. RESOLUTION ON IRAQ
Bloomberg NE

Posted on 11/08/2002 7:19:43 AM PST by NY Catholic

*SECURITY COUNCIL VOTES 15-0 TO ADOPT U.S. RESOLUTION ON IRAQ


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last
To: Publius6961
This in no way takes over the U.S. sovereignty. This is an effort to force the U.N. to do its job or else. It is an effort to make Saddam disarm himself after being told to do so by the international community.

Of course, he won't, then we will discuss with the U.N. However, that discussion will not be another effort to persuade him - it will be a discussion of how to disarm him.

We will be prepared to disarm him. President Bush mentioned in his press meeting yesterday that we did not need to worry about using force. It would be done swiftly, effectively and would take care of the problem.

In knowing Bush - these are not idle words.
121 posted on 11/08/2002 9:25:25 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
It didn't matter what the UN voted, the US was going to do what it had to do. The best news is that it gives the commie libs one less issue to go after Bush with.
122 posted on 11/08/2002 9:31:44 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Comment #123 Removed by Moderator

To: NY Catholic
If Tony Blair was GW's Poodle, then today, the UN is W's DOG POUND. Who's yo daddy?!?!
124 posted on 11/08/2002 9:47:06 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReaganRevolution
Why would he do something "stupid"?

He'll play ball. Longevity and control of Iraq are probably his two top priorities. His allies bought him one more chance through the UN.

If he doesn't, not only will he be doomed, he'll have humiliated every friend he had (Russia, France among others)

His best and only option is to play ball in which case he'll get the 1991 sanctions fully lifted (also part of the UN deal in question compliments of Russia). Saddam gets his victory at home (sanctions lifted/attack averted), world is content with Iraq.

I suppose we could attack anyway but it would be very bad form to violate a resolution we wrote and voted for.
125 posted on 11/08/2002 9:53:14 AM PST by Jake0001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: NY Catholic; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 75thOVI; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
I think we need to have Kofi Annan pull up a chair at this table..


126 posted on 11/08/2002 9:54:43 AM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
also dascHOLE!

free the south,sw

127 posted on 11/08/2002 9:56:22 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
I think they will be next regardless of what they want. They won't be able to stay out of it IMO. I know the value of Damascus Steel but anyone have the price on Damascus " green glass".......:o) USA and Israel is getting ready to flood the market with some !

Stay Safe !

128 posted on 11/08/2002 10:02:01 AM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NY Catholic
what's the text?
are years allowed for inspections?
if they conclude: yup, they're in 'material breech', how many months or years of debate would be possible regarding the remedy for this case?
129 posted on 11/08/2002 10:06:48 AM PST by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jake0001
Don't you think he doesn't believe Bush would actually attack if he started his games again? That's all I'm saying, he's played games for years with no consequences. He may still believe there are no consequences.
130 posted on 11/08/2002 10:08:30 AM PST by ReaganRevolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
LOL!!!!!!!
131 posted on 11/08/2002 10:08:44 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican; ppaul; Magnolia; RobFromGa; freedumb2003; pitinkie; Lurking2Long; All
Thanks y'all! Glad you enjoyed it!

One more time for anyone who missed the fun:
http://www.bigfatbaby.com/newfun2/flash/saddam.swf
132 posted on 11/08/2002 10:16:41 AM PST by theophilusscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
Syria accepts that real change is in the works

Syria supports Bush on Iraq, Jim McDermott(D-WA) doesn't. Another reason for Terry McAuliffe's overwhelming victory last Tuesday.

133 posted on 11/08/2002 10:20:04 AM PST by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death
The Heck with "speaking ill of the dead!" Wellstone was against us too!

So now France can be counted on more than a Liberal Democrat!
134 posted on 11/08/2002 10:35:12 AM PST by freedumb2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
What do you make of:" 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations?"

havin now read the resolution text, as given in this thread, i cannot see a definition of "serious consequences", nor a timetable for the length of the inpection phase and the evaluation of that phase.

135 posted on 11/08/2002 10:36:15 AM PST by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
More B2's in the sky over Kansas yesterday, all going west.
136 posted on 11/08/2002 10:38:37 AM PST by wearredcaps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1234
That means we can interpret it however we want. Like I said in an eatlier post, we have cover for pretty much anything we want to do.
137 posted on 11/08/2002 10:41:18 AM PST by freedumb2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
That means we can interpret it however we want.

oh. great.

Like I said in an eatlier post, we have cover for pretty much anything we want to do.

ok-jus not sure laywers and diplomats would concur....
am left w/impression there's a buncha 'weasle-room'-HOPE I'M SO WRONG!!

138 posted on 11/08/2002 10:48:13 AM PST by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
That liquid squish you just heard was Saddam filling his diaper.

I doubt it. Saddam is like the demonrats. He lives in a fantasy world in which he is all powerful. I bet even now he thinks he will outsmart us.
139 posted on 11/08/2002 10:49:23 AM PST by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
You underestimate our deterrence, their rational cowardice, and the absolute control their tyranny has over their population. Syria has been ideologically committed to the obliteration of Israel since 1973. But they have carefully steered out of their way. When they brushed in 1982, the Syrians did not at all like the result and backed down rapidly. They will steer clear this time, too. They simply don't want to lose, and they can easily choose to sit on their hands instead. So they will.

Whether we pressure them afterward, that is another question. But they are not going to accelerate a suicide by confronting us head on when they do not have to.

140 posted on 11/08/2002 10:56:37 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson