Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New US Marine Corps Technologies [Powerpoint Presentation]
Marine Corps Warfighting Lab ^

Posted on 11/08/2002 12:05:04 AM PST by VaBthang4











TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; Israel; Technical
KEYWORDS: marinecorps; military; rd; semperfi; warfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Some interesting stuff...especially "Yodaville".
1 posted on 11/08/2002 12:05:04 AM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MP5SD; Gunrunner2; MudPuppy; tomcat; Gritty; opbuzz; spetznaz; PsyOp; Marine Inspector; XBob; ...

2 posted on 11/08/2002 12:07:21 AM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Can I have one of those UCATS, please?
3 posted on 11/08/2002 12:19:01 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
They're phasing out my Mk19 MOD3 in favor of a laser-range fused model, too.
4 posted on 11/08/2002 12:20:17 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
The aerostat is cool. Right out of a William Gibson novel. Half helicopter, half blimp.
5 posted on 11/08/2002 12:22:31 AM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
I just looked at the size of it. The rotor is only 7 feet wide!
6 posted on 11/08/2002 12:26:33 AM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
Aircraft can be a lot smaller when you don't have to accomodate those bulky humans.
7 posted on 11/08/2002 2:44:28 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tangofox
STRIKER 40mm

tangofox, you haven't done a weapon review in quite some time.

8 posted on 11/08/2002 2:52:22 AM PST by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
This proves that no army in the world can keep up with us. Anybody we wish to F with, will go down in flames, islamic fanatasism or not.
9 posted on 11/08/2002 2:53:42 AM PST by the tongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4; g'nad; USMCVet; Teacup; XtreMarine
Neat stuff, Huh? I work at the Warfighting Lab.
The boys do like their toys here :)

OOh-Rah! Semper Fidelis!
Happy Birthday Marines!!
10 posted on 11/08/2002 5:21:08 AM PST by MudPuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Man, you will need 3 people to hump that Grenade Launcher!!
11 posted on 11/08/2002 5:30:57 AM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4; harpseal; Travis McGee; Squantos; sneakypete; Chapita; COB1
My Christmas list in powerpoint.
12 posted on 11/08/2002 6:16:55 AM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
There's nothing I hate more than a long "kill chain".

BTW, what's a "kill chain"?

13 posted on 11/08/2002 6:31:31 AM PST by avg_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Damn .... now I know how Vietnam vets felt. I got out and all this really kewl stuff is coming online. Makes me wanna go play again.

The baby RPV plane and helos could be a godsend to infantry. Just drop one in every platoon and you have an instant tactical recon.

14 posted on 11/08/2002 6:35:06 AM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Man, you will need 3 people to hump that Grenade Launcher!!

No kidding! I laughed out loud at their "lightweight" description. "Lightweight" compared to what,a Bradley?

BTW,am I the only one wondering why any ground troops would want or need a full-auto 40mm grenade launcher? ESPECIALLY one with programable munitions that are laser-guided. Seems like somebody is forgetting the infantry carries their ammo on their backs,doesn't it?

15 posted on 11/08/2002 7:42:21 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete; razorback-bert
Ditto that lightweight comment......SP ! I do know that ,checkpoints, fixed defensive positions, ramp of a HH53 or Sh&thook or mounted on humvees , ect ect the Mk-19's is/was a GOOD THING...... I never got used to trippin that bolt with a stick though :o)

Stay Safe !

16 posted on 11/08/2002 8:57:18 AM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Looks like Christmas came early this year for our wonderful Leathernecks. Enjoy the toys guys and gals. Y'all are definitly on Santa's Nice List ;)
17 posted on 11/08/2002 9:09:37 AM PST by Copperhead61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
A long string of communication links between the Mark I eyeball that sees the target, and the guided whatever that actually takes it out. Pvt to Sgt to FAC to AWAC to F-16 pilot - that kind of thing. In action, those always slow things down, break outright, put the bombs in the wrong place, mis-ID targets, yada yada. A shorter chain works better.
18 posted on 11/08/2002 11:28:05 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
Thank you. Interesting terminology.
19 posted on 11/08/2002 11:30:12 AM PST by avg_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Actually, our guys are getting dramatically low in the firepower department, and it is showing. The emphasis on "light" has led to mere squads getting pinned down by MGs in simple bunkers, with nothing to take them out short of calling for an F-16 and trying to get it to see a pimple on the side of K-2. Attack helos aren't working well at high altitude and they take rotor hits in a heartbeat.

Guys in Afghanistan are reporting the 5.56mm fails outright against adobe huts. They are using AT-4s on huts, bunkers, and cave entrances because it is the only thing they have with enough punch - at 15 lbs per round and with only about 250 meter range. They also report always bringing their 60mm mortars - WW II era light weapons with tiny punch and no smart anything - because any long ranged direct fire support they can actually bring with them up and down mountains is better than none.

Incidentally, they aren't fighting light enough, either. They are hauling up to 80 lbs each, even leaving behind their bags and freezing at night in consequence. Above 8000 ft that is way too much weight. UH-60s can resupply them tactically because they can't fly that high. CH-47s can, but were never meant to be used so close to hot LZs and their numbers are limited.

Above all they are short on firepower. Enemies with 82mm mortars, HMGs, and RPGs pin us down until the air force arrives. Our much vaunted high tech uber-guys have nothing heavier than SAWs, and when they've thought to bring them AT-4s with very limited range, or pip-squeak 60mm mortars. They should be hauling Javelin ATGMs and Mk-19 auto GLs with 1 km plus range to take out enemy heavy weapons and fortified positions, but they flat aren't.

Why? Overreliance on CAS, overemphasis on "light", tiny sections, flattened unit structures that leave the heavy weapons sections behind, an overall snake-eater and maneuver element ethos that looks down on fire support elements. Our ATGMs are at the battalion level, for pete's sake. Meanwhile, 1000 men are expected to encircle 70 square miles of 8000 foot mountains. With just SAWs.

20 posted on 11/08/2002 11:41:38 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson