Posted on 11/07/2002 10:29:37 PM PST by kattracks
Here is a story of two trials and how they were covered in the news. Or not covered. You tell me what it says about the media's twisted values.
The first trial was held in Beverly Hills. The accused was Hollywood starlet Winona Ryder, charged with shoplifting at a Saks Fifth Avenue store. A Nexis search turned up more than 500 stories on the trial published over the past week alone. Television, news and radio reporters from around the world breathlessly described Ryder's daily court attire -- her hairbands, her coatdresses, her shoes, her bra straps, her lipstick.
We learned the all-important details of how she appeared "pale" one day, "chipper" the next. Crack news reporters informed us that she is "doe-eyed" and "petite." Talking heads endlessly scrutinized the trial evidence, tapes and testimony. Psychologists explained the motivations of kleptomaniacs. Entertainment insiders parsed Ryder's film career for clues.
On Wednesday, the cable shows provided "breaking news" coverage of the guilty verdicts and wall-to-wall analysis of What This Means For Winona. The New York Times and Washington Post followed up with bylined news articles.
This, you see, was news that mattered. News fit to print.
Meanwhile, in unglamorous Wichita, Kan., the eight-week trial of Jonathan and Reginald Carr came to a close. The brothers were found guilty of four counts of capital murder, along with numerous charges of rape, aggravated robbery, burglary and theft, committed during an unspeakably brutal killing spree in December 2000.
The perpetrators were black. The victims -- including friends Jason Befort, Heather Muller, Bradley Heyka and Aaron Sander -- were white. The Carrs were convicted of murdering these four young people, execution-style, on a frozen soccer field after a night of terror in Befort, Heyka and Sander's townhouse. After breaking into the residence, the Carrs forced Muller and Jason Befort's unnamed fiance to perform sexual acts on each other; the men were then forced to participate. Next, the Carrs raped the women, drove all five victims to an ATM machine, forced them to withdraw money from their accounts, and headed to the soccer field.
The five victims were forced to kneel in the snow and beg for their lives before sustaining gunshots to the head. The Carrs then ran over their victims with their truck. Befort's fiance miraculously survived. She walked more than a mile, bleeding and naked, in the snow, before finding help.
When such senseless, evil savagery takes place against politically correct victims, the mainstream media is quick to make national news of such crimes. "If this had been two white males accused of killing four black individuals, the media would be on a feeding frenzy and every satellite news organization would be in Wichita doing live reports," wrote Trent Hungate of Wichita in a letter to the Wichita Eagle after the killings two years ago. Indeed. The horrific James Byrd dragging case in Texas and the Matthew Shepard murder in Wyoming, for example, garnered front-page headlines and continuous coverage.
But with the exception of local Kansas newspapers, the Associated Press, The Washington Times, Fox News, Court TV and conservative Internet sites, the Carr trial made almost no news.
If you read The New York Times or The Washington Post or watched the evening news this week, the Wichita Massacre never happened. Not to worry, though. The latest investigative report on where Winona Ryder got that Hermes handbag is coming up next. Stay tuned.
Contact Michelle Malkin | Read her biography
©2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
WOW
BTW, welcome to FreeRepublic.
How do media sluts sleep at night?
Please let me know if you want on (or off) this list.
Please add me to your Michelle Malkin ping list.
Thanks
You do have a point. Not too many people, except us locals, were interested but the case did receive a lot more national attention compared to the Carr murders.
Kansas Jury Recommends Death For Man Convicted of Killing 3 Women, Stuffing Bodies in Barrels
For more than twenty years, black-on-white crimes, no matter how hideous, have been carefully airbrushed out of the national picture, while the statistically far less frequent white-on-black crimes have been made into causes celebres, arguments for everything from police sensitivity retraining to reparations for slavery.
Equally inexplicable, the media consistently downplay the torrent of criminal victimization of blacks by other blacks. Nor do they give any attention to the devastating economic effects black-on-black crime has on predominantly black neighborhoods.
There's no understanding it. It's as if the media were actively engaged in deceiving the American people about the most important locus of racism in America today. Yet I don't know one single individual who isn't perfectly aware of the dominant trend in interracial crime.
Why lie, at the top of your lungs, no less, when you don't have a prayer of putting it over? Why squander your credibility, such as it is, to no gain?
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.