Skip to comments.
The New Democrat Plantation: A FR Roundup of Vote Fraud In South Dakota
The Free Republic ^
| November 6, 2002
| various members of the Free Republic
Posted on 11/06/2002 7:53:31 AM PST by an amused spectator
Vote Fraud South Dakota Style - by the numbers Posted by DownWithGreenspan On 10/31/2002
Dem Ethics? South Dakota Dems dont acknowledge the importance of their voter-fraud problem Posted by xsysmgr On 10/29/2002
Resource: News on South Dakota Vote Fraud Posted by Republican_Strategist On 10/24/2002
The shambles in South Dakota (MICHELLE MALKIN) Posted by Sabertooth On 10/22/2002
Lost in Translation: Bilingual voting and the South Dakota Senate race ^ Posted by Utah Girl On 10/22/2002
South Dakota: Fraud cases cloud S.D. elections (Update) Posted by Ernest_at_the_Beach On 10/20/2002
Local Update - Election Fraud in South Dakota [my title] Posted by Oldeconomybuyer On 10/19/2002
First person charged with voter fraud [in South Dakota] Posted by jpthomas On 10/18/2002
Dems Paid $12,000 to South Dakota Vote Fraud Figure Posted by Tumbleweed_Connection On 10/18/2002
Shannon joins counties with voter trouble (South Dakota Vote Fraud Investigation) Posted by Brian Mosely On 10/18/2002
Dead Men Voting (South Dakota) Posted by Pokey78 On 10/15/2002
Voter Fraud Investigation (S. Dakota) Posted by mondonico On 10/14/2002
'MASSIVE' VOTER FRAUD UNDER INVESTIGATION IN SOUTH DAKOTA... Posted by vannrox On 10/12/2002
Indians will cast pivotal ballots on reservations in South Dakota Posted by JohnHuang2 On 09/01/2002
The Difference between North and South Dakota (Vanity) Posted by crystalk On 08/25/2002
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: democrats; pledge; theplantation; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
The last place the Democrats want people examining vote fraud is on the sparsely populated, windswept High Plains...
They really stepped in doo-doo with this one. We've got to hit this hard on the Free Republic, because the lamestream media WON'T report on this unless we rub their noses in it - and maybe not even then.
To: an amused spectator
Evidently there will be a mandatory recount. I hope at that time they check those indian reservations carefully for instances of vote fraud. Only about 500 instances of dead warriers and squaws will do the trick.
2
posted on
11/06/2002 7:58:47 AM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: an amused spectator
3
posted on
11/06/2002 7:59:42 AM PST
by
hchutch
To: an amused spectator
Since this election is so close, I assume there'll be a mandatory recount, correct? (Don't know for sure since "sparsely populated" means that 500 votes means more than it does in a densely populated state).
And since the FBI is already supposed to be investigating the Indian Reservation mess, could it be that this will be the time we catch the Dems red-handed at what they have been attempting to do to subvert the democratic process for years now?
4
posted on
11/06/2002 8:03:11 AM PST
by
Illbay
To: SpaceBar; Admin Moderator
Just to let you know: This is considered VERY crass language. Would you say "dead n*****s" if you were talking about Atlanta?
5
posted on
11/06/2002 8:04:46 AM PST
by
Illbay
To: Illbay
Agreed. However, many folks whose only indian education came from the TV and old movies have no knowledge of how really offensive this is. My kids were quite taken aback when I explained it to them. Education erases ignorance...
To: Illbay
What's wrong about talking about dead nitwits in Atlanta?
To: an amused spectator
I think this "loss" by Thune will be a good thing----it will force a vote fraud investigation and maybe bring the Rats dirty tactics into the daylight.
8
posted on
11/06/2002 8:14:11 AM PST
by
hexpoppy
To: Illbay
Yes, there will be a mandatory recount.
I don't know what The Little General was thinking - he must have been sure that the Democrats were going to take the whole enchilada, and that the Democrats in the national media would be able to bury this South Dakota business under the cover of THAT news.
I guess nobody told Mondale and Douschle about the Internet. ;-)
To: justshutupandtakeit
LOL!
To: hexpoppy
Agreed. South Dakota ain't Baltimore, and I doubt that the South Dakota Dems have got a Stephen Montanarelli
1 in the bullpen to pull this one out for them.
1 In 1994, strong evidence of vote fraud surfaced in Baltimore when Republican Ellen Sauerbrey was narrowly defeated for governor. State Prosecutor Stephen Montanarelli, a Democrat who later prosecuted Linda Tripp for taping her phone conversations with Monica Lewinsky, declined to prosecute the voter fraud case. Two former members of Maryland's Administrative Board of Election Laws, a Republican and a Democrat, expressed shock, saying the election was clearly tainted and that there were numerous admitted violations of the election code.
To: Illbay
"Would you say "dead n*****s" if you were talking about Atlanta?" Hey, if they want to play the race card through fraud, then let them suffer the consequences...they're just shooting themselves in the foot when their actions add to their perceived "stereotype". (Stereotype is as stereotype does).
To: Illbay
I'm not sure if you're right. Sure, squaw is the latest entry on the PC list of forbidden words. But what do real Indians as opposed to political Native Americans think about it? I don't honestly know.
According to a little piece I read by Tony Hillerman, a group of Navajo chiefs and other SW Indian elders got together some years ago to decide if they preferred to be called Indians or Native Americans. They don't think of themselves as Indians, anyway. They think of themselves as "the people," as Navajo, Hopi, Arapaho, or whatever.
The universal consensus at the time is that Indian was the name other people called them collectively and it would be foolish to change it. One chief is said to have remarked: "It's a good thing Columbus thought he discovered India, not Turkey." I've heard both sides on the word squaw. My inclination is not to trust the language police until they've proven their case, or the people being labeled definitively reject the word. I don't think that's happened yet. I'm suspicious that it took so many years for Indians to notice.
13
posted on
11/06/2002 8:26:41 AM PST
by
Cicero
To: an amused spectator
I asked this on another thread, but I thought Indians were their own nations, exempt from taxes and some laws, etc., so how in the heck do they get to vote in US elections? Either they are citizens or they aren't. How can they not pay taxes and yet still get to vote, or is that only some tribes? I'm confused.
To: an amused spectator
All I know for sure is that about 8 pm last night, Ron Kirk resigned as Democrat candidate for Texas senate.
Tom Daschle announced that he will be replaced on the ballot by LBJ and because he's dead (voted twice in this election) his widow, Lady Bird, will serve in his place.
15
posted on
11/06/2002 8:35:18 AM PST
by
lonestar
To: an amused spectator
Its safe to say the democrats "have" cheated in S.D., if you believe their get-out-the-vote employee who admitted forging signatures and burning ballots. Whether this will be treated as a crime or not is not clear. Remember, Bush didn't pursue the Rich Pardon, so, since they now control the Senate, I wouldn't be surprised if they sweep this under the rug, so as to not make waves or look mean (aka spinelessness). If there is real evidence, and I believe there is, then it should be pursued. To sweep this away as has been done so many times in the past (as a matter of routine), because of spinelessness (a.k.a. Trent Lott) or fear of letting Americans know for sure that our election system isn't perfect will ensure future elections crime.
16
posted on
11/06/2002 8:35:58 AM PST
by
ampat
To: ampat
I don't know - I hate to see our side perpetuate the "don't win, take it to court" mindset. The more frequently it happens, the more it will continue to happen. The courts still tend to be stacked with libs, so in the long run that strategy could hurt us.
17
posted on
11/06/2002 8:39:01 AM PST
by
Spyder
To: Pining_4_TX
You should live in NY state where the INDIANS (and that's what the Oneida Indians call themselves) are trying to steal half of Central New York. They don't pay taxes but have a big gambling casino, hotels, gas stations, etc. and drive out other businesses who can't compete with them. Pataki did nothing about it. Now another Oneida tribe from Wisconsin, I think, has put a claim on several large businesses here. It's insane. I had to buy insurance for my house that guarantees me the price I paid for it in case they throw me off my land. Well, warrior princess isn't going without a fight. I don't know that it would ever come to that but they'll never get our place witout one big fight. We worked too hard to finally be able to buy one.
To: Pining_4_TX
You should live in NY state where the INDIANS (and that's what the Oneida Indians call themselves) are trying to steal half of Central New York. They don't pay taxes but have a big gambling casino, hotels, gas stations, etc. and drive out other businesses who can't compete with them. Pataki did nothing about it. Now another Oneida tribe from Wisconsin, I think, has put a claim on several large businesses here. It's insane. I had to buy insurance for my house that guarantees me the price I paid for it in case they throw me off my land. Well, warrior princess isn't going without a fight. I don't know that it would ever come to that but they'll never get our place witout one big fight. We worked too hard to finally be able to buy one.
To: an amused spectator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson