Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missouri Senate Result To be Delayed (Another Fraud Alert)
AP ^

Posted on 11/02/2002 6:48:11 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

NOVEMBER 02, 09:43 ET Missouri Ballots Spur Uncertainty

By LIBBY QUAID Associated Press Writer AP/James A. Finley [26K] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON (AP) — It could take days or even weeks to declare a winner in the Senate race in Missouri, and that could leave control of the Senate in question for the rest of 2002.

Democratic Sen. Jean Carnahan and Republican challenger Jim Talent are running in a close race. And because of the state's new provisional voting system, which allows voters whose registration is in question to cast a ballot, Secretary of State Matt Blunt said Thursday it may take time to declare a winner and certify the election.

How does that affect control of the Senate? The race is a special election, a circumstance that traditionally results in the victor being sworn in immediately, rather than when a new term begins in January.

Democrats now control the Senate by a single vote — that of independent James Jeffords of Vermont — but if Talent wins in Missouri, that control would be in question when the Senate reconvenes for a lame-duck session to finish congressional spending bills and a homeland security bill.

Carnahan was appointed to the vacancy created when voters elected her husband, Gov. Mel Carnahan, three weeks after he died in a plane crash in 2000. Senate vacancies are filled by temporary appointments until the next general election, and Mrs. Carnahan and Talent are seeking the final four years of the term.

Under Missouri law, the vacancy lasts only until a successor is ``elected and qualified according to law.'' Federal law covers the next step, which is that the governor and secretary of state — in Missouri, a Democrat and a Republican — certify the election to the Senate.

Some Democrats have raised questions about whether Democratic Gov. Bob Holden would somehow delay certification of the winner if Talent — who narrowly lost to Holden in the 2000 governor's race — is the victor.

Holden said Friday: ``I will do my job. As soon as I get the information, I will act accordingly and do it as quickly as possible. All Missourians as well as the nation could be looking at the results.''

The recent death of Minnesota Democratic Sen. Paul Wellstone creates a vacancy in the same manner as the posthumous election of Mel Carnahan.

It's up to Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura whether to appoint the winner of the Nov. 5 election — Republican Norm Coleman or Democratic former Sen. Walter Mondale — or someone else.

Minnesota elections officials said the results of the race are likely to be delayed into Wednesday, due to a supplemental ballot required after Wellstone's death.

The state Supreme Court ordered local election officials to deliver new ballots to absentee voters who ask to change their Senate vote.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS:
Can't you just imagine more Gephardt-appointed "judges" making their rulings on voter eligibility?
1 posted on 11/02/2002 6:48:11 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
And because of the state's new provisional voting system, which allows voters whose registration is in question to cast a ballot, Secretary of State Matt Blunt said Thursday it may take time to declare a winner and certify the election.

I love this system. As Rush Limbaugh pointed out, it is a blatant attempt at vote fraud: We will let you cast a ballot even though we don't think you're eligible, and if you turn out to be eligible (read: "If Carnahan needs your vote") we will count it.

2 posted on 11/02/2002 7:03:42 AM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
This article certainly reads as if this reporter has been given a whole series of talking points. These days, it would be highly unusual for a reporter to investigate all those hypothetical legal details ahead of time, unless someone briefed him--probably one of the Dem governor's aides. Evidently preparing the way for things to follow, as you suggest.
3 posted on 11/02/2002 7:11:13 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Oh, I get it.

If (when) Talent wins, the Senate IMMEDIATELY goes to the GOP.

Of course, that can't happen if the results are delayed for "days, or even weeks."

They'll stop at nothing.

4 posted on 11/02/2002 7:14:03 AM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Guy Angelito
Yes he is. But he cannot single-handedly stop the delays or the fraud.
6 posted on 11/02/2002 7:18:47 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I think we're blessed to have Blunt acting as a watchdog over these questionnable ballots. And I am going to bet that if these creeps think they might get in trouble from voting illegally, unlike 2000, the turnout of these "provisional" voters will be quite light. After all, they will have their names and addresses so tracing someone who is voting twice will be a lot easier. Furthermore, because it segregates questionnable votes from the count from the beginning, accuracy of a total count should be more reliable and earlier than expected.

Holden is going to be a one-term gov and this is typical of the kind of little creep he is. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Blunt isn't the guy who runs against him.

Ultimately, Blunt will come through and make the count so accurate that it cannot be contested in court and Holden will have no choice but to certify it in on time.

If we could only be so confident about the potential for voting fraud in SD, MD, and MN!

7 posted on 11/02/2002 7:31:51 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Missouri, the "Slow Me" state.
8 posted on 11/02/2002 7:54:17 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Talent wins by a margin greater than the number of challenged votes then the point is moot and a winner can be declared right?
9 posted on 11/02/2002 7:54:48 AM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I'm no expert, not even a MO resident, but that sounds logical to me. Then again, its logicality alone would probably be grounds for a Dem court challenge!
10 posted on 11/02/2002 7:57:08 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
The Evil Democrats will stop at NOTHING!! They are turning us into a Banana Republic....with NO BANANAS!!!
11 posted on 11/02/2002 8:00:36 AM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
The dems are playing with a potential backlash well beyond the political level. There may be some people out there who feel they've gone too far towards trashing the rule of law. Let 'em. Political Darwinism can only help conservatives in the long run.
12 posted on 11/02/2002 8:04:26 AM PST by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
ANYTHING by the Dems to usurp power...and in the meantime, the Repubs continue to bring boxing gloves to a gunfight...
13 posted on 11/02/2002 8:50:57 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Yes, we have no bananas. We have no bananas today.
14 posted on 11/02/2002 9:24:27 AM PST by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: governsleastgovernsbest
bump
16 posted on 11/03/2002 11:33:38 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson