Posted on 10/30/2002 2:19:55 AM PST by kattracks
I simply included the ENGLISH definitions, but was explicitly referring to the LATIN and the GREEK origins...
[Middle English, from Late Latin daemon, from Latin, spirit, from Greek daimon, divine power.]
In other words, the word demon in English means something entirely different in Greek and Latin. That was the point I was trying to make. I was ALSO making the point that the Scriptures were translated to Latin and English from Greek. They didn't speak modern English in those days you know.
With that considered, if the Latin daemon means 'spirit', and the Greek daimon means 'divine power', what exactly was meant when the word daimon was utilized in Scripture?
Now do you see how this can get confusing? In fact, you've never answered my original question as to exactly WHERE in Scripture the word is used. Can you find a reference?
I DO understand the current useage of the word. I'm simply trying to say that it didn't always mean the same thing as it does today. That is why I'd like to see how exactly the word was used if it was used at all....
You would have had a lot of fun in Salem, MA back in the 1600's. Lighten up a bit and realize that not everything you don't understand equates to witchcraft. You apparently have no understanding of what real witchcraft is. There are many types of witchcraft, but they all revolve around the concept of appeasing deities and/or asking for the assistance of spirits (or demons) for power over Nature in the material world.
Understand this one thing, there is no such thing as GOOD WITCHES and BAD WITCHES, it is all evil.
Understand this. When you pray to God, you are asking for a favor usually, correct? What you are doing is practicing WITCHCRAFT, as you are asking a deity to assist you to effect a change in the material world. You are effectively trying to cast a spell. It would appropriately be called sorcery if instead of praying to God, you were asking for the assistance of evil spirits to do your bidding.
Once again, which of the verses I listed that clearly state that what this women does is forbidden by God don't you understand?
That which you mention 'clearly' forbids eating meat. Are you a vegetarian? I'll get back to you on that topic in a separate post.
That's the exect same point I have been trying to make to you. You have this simple, pop culture understanding of the topic.
Is Ms. Baron a Freeper perhaps?
We do know that everyone experiences the surprise of 'coincidence'. . .synchronicty, in their lives. You do not consciously make it happen - no event is ever identical in how it manifests and these 'happenings' while 'real' cannot be recreated in a lab or a 'test'. . .But we know 'it' happens. . .
Perhaps you can explain, the why of 'hunches', coincidences, intuition; or just feelings (save brain locus etc.)These experieces cannot be quantified or measured either; they are not precisely 'predictable'; nor are they'made to order'. We do not however deny their existance; we just 'name it' and by that naming, we move the irrational to the 'rational' and no longer need to ponder the challenges they offer in terms of questioning the possibilities of a greater reality than the one we assume. . .
The 'psychic' stems from the same world of the irrational; it operates from 'feelings' and yes, and just as unpredictable; and with no guarantees. . .and short of challenging statistical odds; it is not laboratory worthy.
Regarding 'Randi' (and yes, I am familiar with his work - and in my haste I thoughtlessly mispelled his name - mea culpa offered); and I am not denying that much of what passes as psychic is as 'real' as a magic act. . .but to challenge all things 'psychic' still requires mental gymnastics that in the end, do challenge even the magic of the 'Amazing Randi'.
. . .and even a 'magic act' offers a challenge to a sceptic that there is more to reality than meets the eye.
. . .and of coure, Faith Healers, belong to a different classification of 'magic act'. . .but still depend on the same suspension of belief - if only in the mind of the beholder.
. . .and you can save those 'kumbaya's. . .please. . .
I do believe people can have a prophetic gift from God, but there are two qualifications: first, they have to state that they are relaying information given by God. Secondly, their predictions have to be 100% on the mark. Otherwise, they are false prophets and in the Old Testament days were subject to stoning. Not a lot of grey area there.
This is not a matter of dismissing something because we don't understand it. It's a matter of dismissing something because we understand the various methods of deception and fraud involved.
I "don't understand" how a 'Rat precinct can get 110% voter turnout, but I don't consider it evidence of a supernatural event.
Puh-leeze. If correctly predicting that the sniper attacks were the work of several Islamist wack-jobs is evidence of psychic power, then there are dozens if not hundreds of "psychics" among the regular FReepers.
LOL -- maybe Clowntoon and his various enablers are "psychic". They sure knew how to obfuscate clear facts into vague fog.
Dozens of people right here were saying multiple shooters, based on the mix of head and body shots.
Better round up the 'Rat precinct captains before Tuesday, then....
Not taking away anything from anyone here, for sure! . . . and I am not defending the merits or lack thereof, of this psychic. . .only those that would deny the existance of anything psychic. . .and simply denounce all as bogus. . .or even 'hocus-pocus'. . .or worse.
. . .just offering a view that offers that there are numerous phenomena that challenge us to enlarge our view of things. . .that's all. . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.