Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The truth about Viet Nam, and life there today.
Self Researched. | Oct 2002 | Exton

Posted on 10/19/2002 12:59:12 AM PDT by Exton1

The truth about Viet Nam, and life there today.

Exton

I have been to Viet Nam twice in the last two years. In fact I went with the son of someone who for a short period of time was the highest ranking representative of the South. The dirty truth is that we actually won the war MILITARILY and lost it due to politics and lies of the communist press here in the states. Walter Cronkite, a proclaimed communist, lied when he said after the “Tet Offensive” that we were in a quagmire. The truth is that we had just destroyed the Viet Cong. They spent several years and all they had at us, and we kicked their butts. In fact the communist were surprised that we did not declare victory then.

The US killed so many men during the war that women had to fight. Even today the ratio of women to men is about 5 to 1. (Many families sent their boys out of the country to work so they could send money home) In fact the country almost had mass starvation, due to the war and the stupidity of the Communist leadership. It was not until about 5 years ago that they have had enough rice and goods to export.

What happened is that the last leader of the South was a communist who basically gave the country to the North. The North Communist had estimated that it would take 3 to 5 years to take over the South. Because of the action of the South’s president, the Communists met little if any resistance and took the country in about 3 months. What is also not widely known is that Nixon’s Christmas bombing almost won the war. The communist leader in Hanoi, said that had the bombing continued for a day or two longer they WOULD HAVE GIVEN UP UNCONDITIONALLY.

In addition , the Wall Street Journal had an article about 8 years ago that talk brought up the “Domino Effect.” Because we fought the war for about 10 years, this gave surrounding countries the time they needed to become DEMOCRACIES. People in countries like Thailand, give us credit for wining the war and stopping the spread of communism.

The lesson of Viet Nam is that, you do not go to war with a country unless you plan to finish the job and win. Once we were committed we should have stayed and finished the job. And that we should always support our troops and explain to the public why we are fighting.

In addition, it has been pointed out that America ONLY spent about one or two hour total explaining to the GI’s why they were fighting. This compared to the Communist who spent nearly 4 hours a day, every day explaining to its solders why they were fighting. They told their soldiers that as poor as they were, the South was worse, because of US Imperialism the South did not even have bowls for their rice. That there was mass starvation and poverty. With stories like this many soldiers felt that their was great need to fight. So many were extremely surprised to find that it was all a lie, and that the South lived in luxury compared to them. Many said if they had known the truth they would have not fought or changed sides.

If you go to Viet Nam today you will find that the people love America and much of our culture. With the exception of the Government run War Museums, you will think the West won. Viet Nam has discos and night clubs where they sing American Songs, dress in American style clothes, and use cell phones. Although it always helps to be with someone who speaks the language, more people are learning English in Viet Nam then at any time in the past.

However, the county is very poor and change is slow because the old jungle fighters run the country, and they are extremely greedy. The average income is about $80.00 per month. When I was there I read a story about a family of four or five who got by on about $1,200 a year. The populace are fairly intelligent and realize that if they are to grow they have to get rid of Communist rule. Even though the government has repressed anti-government talk. It will only be a matter of time before even they ended up on the ash heap of history.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: communist; vietnam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last
To: Red Jones
The 2nd battle of Khe Sahn is considered to have started 1/27/68 and to have lasted 77 days. Most of the NVA munitions were Chi-Coms. It was in this battle that Soviet tanks we first seen in the south. Here is a decent synopsis of the seige, researched and written by a genuine hero.
http://members.tripod.com/~DARTO/
121 posted on 10/20/2002 11:03:41 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RLK
"The North had gathered together a number of concentrated armored divisions."

That's a fact. PT's - amphibious tanks, if I remember rightly.
122 posted on 10/20/2002 3:20:09 PM PDT by M. T. Cicero II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
Illbay, you under-estimate that north vietnamese were a strong opponent.

Fine, then we were only HUNDREDS of times more powerful. And we lost, because we did not obtain our objective--ending the North Vietnamese insurgency and stopping the spread of Communism in Vietnam--and they won.

Rewriting history is pointless.

123 posted on 10/20/2002 5:18:48 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Germany lost a war. A couple of 'em in the last century in fact. Japan lost a war. Italy lost a war. LBJ lost a war. I didn't lose a war.

Individuals don't "lose" wars. They lose an limb. They lose a life. They don't lose a war.

To consider myself as having lost the war in Vietnam would mean I didn't have a country to come back to, and, I'd be paying taxes to some office in Hanoi.

Point taken, but in this case "lose" means that YOU didn't subject the enemy to your will, they subjected you to theirs.

We "lost" because of politics, of course, but as I mentioned earlier you cannot take politics out of the equation because the military does not stand alone. The military is a MEANS to a political end, not the end itself.

124 posted on 10/20/2002 5:22:17 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
The military objectives were accomplished...

No, they weren't. You can't divorce "military objectives" from "political objectives." The one is meaningless without the other.

125 posted on 10/20/2002 5:23:45 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
You don’t lose a game that is rigged. You are cheated out of victory, and that is what happened in VN.

No, because "they"--the ones that cheated--were put there by "us." Therefore, in a democratic society such as ours, you can't blame leaders without putting the blame on the citizens that put them in their position of leadership. If you doubt that, remind yourself how angry you get that your idiotic fellow-citizens elected Bill Clinton TWICE to the Presidency.

The soldiers realize that is was a rigged game. And are upset that they were blamed for doing there best and then being accused of being losers.

If the soldiers are professionals--not to mention "real men"--they will simply accept that. That isn't to say that those who spat on our returning soldiers were justified; they weren't. But they were a part of the problem as well.

The real losers were the American and the VIETNAMESE people.

I totally agree. In fact, I would say the Vietnamese ultimately might come out better in the end because they will undoubtedly throw out the Commies when they are able, and never allow them to have power again. Meanwhile, we will be dealing with the dregs of our political class, the Clintons, the Gores, the Daschles, the Gephardts, et al, for a long, long time to come.

Those people were made "legitimate" by their being "right" about Vietnam, and we have been suffering ever since.

126 posted on 10/20/2002 5:28:46 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
We won the war they were too stupid to know it. Why has it taken 30 years for Vietnam to even appear in the economic nomenclature of the american economy?? Because they lost. The only market to sell to is the United States and the communists made sure they wouldn;t be selling anything to us for 30 years. It would have been 50 if they hadn't come to their senses and realized we weren't their enemy the Chinese were. The only people who think we lost are a few reds in vietnam and the press here in america.
127 posted on 10/20/2002 5:34:21 PM PDT by stig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Thanks for the lesson.
128 posted on 10/20/2002 10:56:48 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
If the soldiers are professionals

They weren't. By and large they were drafted. And they were the best. The Best this country ever produced.

They won and won and won, until they were brought home completely by 73. At first tours were a year and a half, then a year. If your name was Al Gore your tour was six months, then you rotated out.

By 1975, Congress had been taken over by newly radicalized leftist weenies who voted to pull the rug out from under the fragile government in the South and to literally waste the sacrifice of the three million Americans who served in Vietnam from 1961 to 1973, including 55,000 dead.

The jackass president who allowed this to happen, Gerald Fraud, was summarily fired by the American electorate for that atrocity, rather than for his quid pro quo pardon of Nixon as leftwing media loves to spin it.

The facts are plain. Our military was never defeated in battle and our troops had been withdrawn two years prior to the communist invasion of the south.

We didn't lose the war, You did, And you continue to lose it every time you and your ill(k) aver and affirm that we did.

LOSER

129 posted on 10/21/2002 1:57:48 AM PDT by navigator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Have you read Nelson DeMille's latest book, Up Country? The author is a Vietnam vet and writes GREAT books. This one, though fiction and not autobiographical, does capture his war experiences and recent travel to Vietnam. You must read it.
130 posted on 10/21/2002 6:18:05 AM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Worst of all, we energized the coterie of dissident Leftists that still plague us today

So true. The ironic thing is it was the Dems who got us in that war and kept us in it. Nixon inherited the mess and finally gave in. The political capital to lose was the Dems', but it has been conservatives who have suffered.

131 posted on 10/21/2002 6:21:42 AM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
While I was only born in 1972, my wife is Vietnamese and her father is a very proud veteran of the "good guys." He loves America as much as anyone I know. However, there is one thing that I'm sure most of us know, but I feel I must point it out to honor him. The war was NOT "North vs. South," but rather Communists vs. Nationalists. My father in law is from the north, and it drives him mad when Americans assume he's a commie (or at least a former commie). This simplification is an unfair assessment of a country that has been torn apart more than anyone cares to recall.
132 posted on 10/21/2002 6:29:01 AM PDT by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Late response:
I seem to remember wearing bright and shiny tags and such right up to processing into SVN (mid 1968).

That would have been just after the VN Customs cops trooped down the aisle of Easter Egg airlines and dusted us all with Raid.

(Couldn't have alien bugs competing for local turf after all.)
133 posted on 10/21/2002 1:18:17 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
"While I was only born in 1972, my wife is Vietnamese and her father is a very proud veteran of the "good guys." He loves America as much as anyone I know. However, there is one thing that I'm sure most of us know, but I feel I must point it out to honor him. The war was NOT "North vs. South," but rather Communists vs. Nationalists. My father in law is from the north, and it drives him mad when Americans assume he's a commie (or at least a former commie). This simplification is an unfair assessment of a country that has been torn apart more than anyone cares to recall."

Great post. I don't know if anyone is still listening but a couple of years ago, my girlfriend said to me "98% of the people in VN would love to go to the U.S." I said to her "Do you mean 98% would love to go to the U.S. or would love to just get out of VN?" She agreed that they just want out of VN.

Vietnam has about 76 - 77 million people. Those who are commies number only about 2 million. Do you see the situation? 2 million ruling 74 - 75 million unwilling citizens thru fear, intimidation, withholding of resources, etc., etc., etc.


134 posted on 10/21/2002 9:15:09 PM PDT by Chu Gary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson