Skip to comments.
Online political chat is an insult to democracy. Can it be fixed?
The Boston Globe - Freedom to Flame! ^
| 10/13/2002
| By Nicholas Thompson
Posted on 10/18/2002 4:01:56 PM PDT by vannrox
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:08:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Online political chat is an insult to democracy. Can it be fixed?
THE OTHER DAY, a group of Americans gathered together to deliberate the wisdom of a war with Iraq.
D. started it off with harsh words for President Bush, arguing that he just wants a war to distract the nation from other ills: ''Face it America, [Bush] is nuts, and is as dangerous as any outside terrorist we could possibly face.''
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Philosophy; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: boston; democrat; freedom; freerepublic; liberty; loss; political; politics; republican; thought
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
From the liberal elite in Boston...
1
posted on
10/18/2002 4:01:57 PM PDT
by
vannrox
To: vannrox
Still, no one has really found the right formula for conducting a political discussion. Untrue. Lightly moderated boards like FR and LibertyForum work pretty well. You can't stop the idiots from wandering in, but if you keep the signal-to-noise ratio high enough, they eventually wander away.
Blog board discussions seem to do pretty well also. Again, the board owner can stop the obvious slop.
To: vannrox
What a bunch of sissies.
;-)
3
posted on
10/18/2002 4:07:59 PM PDT
by
dighton
To: vannrox
"Nicholas Thompson is a Markle Fellow at the New America Foundation."
No mention of FreeRepublic?
Nicholas Thompson also just fell off of a New England turnip truck...
4
posted on
10/18/2002 4:08:57 PM PDT
by
Vidalia
To: vannrox
As a Markle Fellow with the New America Foundation, Mr. Thompson focuses on the Internets impact on innovation, from open-source software to cancer research to democratic reform in Africa.
Mr. Thompson was previously an editor at The Washington Monthly and has also contributed to The Boston Globe, The Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Slate and The Washington Post, among other publications.
He is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Stanford University where he earned degrees in Earth Systems, Political Scienc, and Economics.
Recent contributions:
G8 Summit: Africa and the Information Age
AuthorBiography
5
posted on
10/18/2002 4:17:36 PM PDT
by
demlosers
To: demlosers
Mr. Thompson focuses on the Internets impact on innovation, from open-source software.... Explains why he put Slashdot on a pedestal.
6
posted on
10/18/2002 4:20:00 PM PDT
by
demlosers
To: vannrox
Once again, leftwing censorship must be the answer. This article is rubbish.
7
posted on
10/18/2002 4:21:25 PM PDT
by
bfree
To: vannrox
I don't honestly see a great deal of difference between the discourse quoted above and normal political bar conversation, which is all a chatroom is. It isn't, actually, so much the moderators on FR that maintain the
level of discourse so much as it is the fact that it is a very well-established board with a population that tends to enforce its internal - sometimes unwritten internal - rules with a blowtorch and a sledgehammer.
I have been told that it is an intimidating board for new users, and rightfully so. One does occasionally get to enjoy the sight of a clueless chatroom warrior wandering in, throwing down a contentless vanity post after two days' membership, and wondering why the roof falls in. I liken it to a freshman attending a fraternity party with his own paddle and a large "Kick Me" sign stuck to his back - he's perfectly welcome and no harm is intended but he shouldn't be surprised if he takes a godawful shellacking. There are times and places where one should not tempt fate.
That aside, I've been very pleased with the general cordiality here on FR despite heated differences of opinion on nearly everything. It's about the last place remaining where you hear the equivalent of "hush, child, the adults are talking."
You moron. My butt itches.
To: Joe Bonforte
Lightly moderated boards like FR and LibertyForum work pretty well It's as good as good is. Lightly moderated, but by whom? And that will make or break it, as far as excellence is concerned. If you have a group of 1200 people, and they all get to have their say, that's nice arithmetic, but no mark of excellence.
9
posted on
10/18/2002 4:24:21 PM PDT
by
cornelis
To: Billthedrill
I don't honestly see a great deal of difference between the discourse quoted above and normal political bar conversation Perhaps another comparison would be more beneficial then?
10
posted on
10/18/2002 4:26:29 PM PDT
by
cornelis
To: vannrox
A limited article. If he had read about some of the invective and prose hurled around in some campaigns in the nineteenth century, he's wouldn't judge so glibly. And even some of the Hamilton and Burr election shenanigans.
And I think more journalists would be well served by following certain threads on current events.
To: Billthedrill
That was perfect, nothing more needs to be said. ;)
12
posted on
10/18/2002 4:27:55 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
To: dighton
The ability to flame is found to be generally distributed among all. Perhaps we should give Descartes a call.
13
posted on
10/18/2002 4:28:32 PM PDT
by
cornelis
To: cornelis
Oh, no, I think it's fairly close, just that the author seems to have his expectations set a little high for what is essentially anonymous conversation between strangers. That's not much of a recipe for politesse. At FR is isn't, exactly, strangers, which is one clue to why the level of discourse seems (to me, anyhow) higher here than your average IRC. You don't get "that's below your usual standard" at an IRC; you do, here.
To: swarthyguy
And even some of the Hamilton and Burr election shenanigans Perhaps they lowered to pitch a bit--to a fault. But here's a point: the "equal opportunity employment" of the most assinine ideas is detrimental. Legitimacy of the lowest common denominator is democracy's Achille's heel.
15
posted on
10/18/2002 4:31:11 PM PDT
by
cornelis
To: Billthedrill
his expectations set a little high Democrats, true to their name, set their expectations to the LCD.
16
posted on
10/18/2002 4:33:18 PM PDT
by
cornelis
To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen
FYI
17
posted on
10/18/2002 4:33:59 PM PDT
by
cornelis
To: vannrox
Political Internet boards tend to attract people with unusually shaky conversational skills. This one's funny. I suspect he may have done as much as ten minutes research for this article.
... popular computer programmer and hacker site slashdot.org - break(s) into far fewer shouting matches
No. I may have overestimated the amount of research. By about a factor of 10.
Slate staff members remove irrelevant posts from their boards
Oh! His research was done at Slate! All is explained.
But I'm sure he would ignore this neanderthal, contentless response from an armchair commando with poor conversational skills.
18
posted on
10/18/2002 4:41:13 PM PDT
by
irv
To: cornelis
Agreed. But the LCD is a perennial feature of the political condition - otherwise it moves into an elitism.
People decried TV ads, focus groups etc. How is a "high minded" strategy based on focus groups better?
Plus, back to the boards - lightly moderated and selfpolicing with interested individuals lead to better discourses. But the flaming, trolling and disrupting can be entertaining, too.
Methinks he doth protest too much. Perhaps he doesn't like it that the most active boards don't support his types of ideas too much.
To: vannrox
I would bet dollars to dingoes that if the Net were owned by LIBERAL political sites, this same writer would be touting cyberspace as the next social phenomenon. It is only because the Right commands the Internet that this effete is waving it off so cavalierly.
But this tidal wave will inexorably swamp him and his complacent cronies. They are dinosaurs, and we are the comet.
20
posted on
10/18/2002 4:50:57 PM PDT
by
IronJack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson