hillary is counting on voter fraud to further her "career".
1 posted on
10/17/2002 1:44:16 AM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: kattracks
other approved ID to be able to vote. I wonder what that might be...
2 posted on
10/17/2002 1:48:16 AM PDT by
ambrose
To: kattracks
Hillary and Schumer are smarter than the otherwise unanymous senate? Nope. She's being a race baiting publicity whore who doesn't care one way or the other about voter fraud. She apparently even lobbies for terrorists to be pardoned. Never forget: FALN pardons! Her husband condemned by 95 senators, while the Peurto Rican Community vowed to vote for her.
To: kattracks
We know anti-fraud provisions aren't high on Hillary's "to do" list, but isn't voting against this a little too obvious?
5 posted on
10/17/2002 2:14:37 AM PDT by
GOPJ
To: kattracks
hillary is counting on voter fraud to further her "career".Isn't that the truth !
8 posted on
10/17/2002 2:44:12 AM PDT by
kassie
To: kattracks
bingo...This show how much fraud is needed in New York to elect the beast
To: kattracks
They're just pissed because it takes a lot of money to manufacture fake ID cards for their constituents.
It's hard to imagine anyone objecting to the notion that you need to provide some evidence of who you are in order to vote.
11 posted on
10/17/2002 2:56:52 AM PDT by
Fzob
To: kattracks
So... now what do we do about all the mail in ballots?
13 posted on
10/17/2002 3:29:52 AM PDT by
Gracey
To: kattracks
I was watching Hardball last night because they were at Fordham University and Matthews asked McCain if Hillary should run for president. Before McCain could answer the whole audience boooed soooo loudly that Matthews was embarrased that he even said that he thought Hillary should run. That was the only good part of the show. The rest was a Matthews/McCain Bush Bash.
To: kattracks
But Clinton and Schumer said the bill would harm New York election law by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places. "their names", their dead relatives, their pets, and names that they just make up. Ask South Dakota.
17 posted on
10/17/2002 3:42:56 AM PDT by
kcordell
To: kattracks
Several forms of ID currently acceptable in New York City.
A) Death certificate entitling one to vote in perpetuity for Democratic candidates.
B) Green Card entitling one to a quick $10 for each vote cast at each election district during election day.
C) Any valid expired tourist visa and acompanying communist party membership card from a fellow traveler party.
D) Welfare card entitling the bearer to extra food stamps for each vote cast for a Democrat.
E) Mexican consular identity card entitling the bearer to free beer for voting for the appropiate Democratic candidate.
F) NAACP membership card entitling bearer to a signed autographed picture of Jesse Jackson in exchange for voting Democrat.
Other programs are in the works to increase Democratic margins at the polls. Please send suggestions ASAP to the Democratic National Comittee. Accepted suggestions will entilte you to an autographed stained blue dress from Bill Clinton for women and a bottle of cyanide laced Kool Aid for men.
18 posted on
10/17/2002 3:51:16 AM PDT by
Cacique
To: ml/nj
bump
19 posted on
10/17/2002 4:11:50 AM PDT by
upier
To: kattracks
But Clinton and Schumer said the bill would harm New York election law by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places.
"Duhhh, what do I do know Boss?"
"Make your mark here, and pull the big lever with the Donkey on it!"
"Duhh, OK, uhhhh, sure thing Boss."
X
23 posted on
10/17/2002 4:30:12 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: kattracks
The bill, which would go into effect in 2004, was approved 92 to 2. It would provide funding to improve states' election systems and reduce voter fraud. The money will no doubt come with Federal strings attached and shifting a little more power from the states to the central government. In the long run, this bill is more about control than elections. In the short run, it looks like it may hurt Hitlery.
To: kattracks; COB1; Bigun; Flyer; Humidston; Dog Gone; austingirl; BUSHdude2000; GOPcapitalist; ...
Under the bill's anti-fraud provisions, every voter would have to show a driver's license, Social Security card or other approved ID to be able to vote. One small step in the right direction PING!
To: kattracks
Seems like their vote will be great fodder for future campaign ads against them, if their opponents are smart enought to use it.
27 posted on
10/17/2002 5:02:07 AM PDT by
mombonn
To: kattracks
"This would make it more difficult
FOR THE DEAD to vote in New York," Clinton told The Post.
Highlight her statement to reveal the hidden message!
To: kattracks
...by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places. The democrat poll workers have a tables set up with names sorted by alphabet to make things go smooth.
They must have a separate table just for the people with the name "X"
30 posted on
10/17/2002 5:36:57 AM PDT by
JZoback
To: kattracks
Actual any smart Democrat would have voted against this bill. Any bill that reduces voter fraud is not good for the Democrats.
To: kattracks
"The bill, which would go into effect in 2004, was approved 92 to 2. It would provide funding to improve states' election systems and reduce voter fraud."
This one line explains why Chuck and Hitlery voted against it!
To: kattracks
The big problem isn't the unqualified voters. It's the minority dems who vote in 5 or 10 districts.
Vietnam had the right idea. When you noted, you got an indellible stamp on your wrist. If you had it, you couldn't vote again. Wore off in about 4 days.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson