Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

hillary is counting on voter fraud to further her "career".
1 posted on 10/17/2002 1:44:16 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: kattracks
other approved ID to be able to vote.

I wonder what that might be...

2 posted on 10/17/2002 1:48:16 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Hillary and Schumer are smarter than the otherwise unanymous senate? Nope. She's being a race baiting publicity whore who doesn't care one way or the other about voter fraud. She apparently even lobbies for terrorists to be pardoned. Never forget: FALN pardons! Her husband condemned by 95 senators, while the Peurto Rican Community vowed to vote for her.
4 posted on 10/17/2002 2:07:35 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
We know anti-fraud provisions aren't high on Hillary's "to do" list, but isn't voting against this a little too obvious?
5 posted on 10/17/2002 2:14:37 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
hillary is counting on voter fraud to further her "career".

Isn't that the truth !

8 posted on 10/17/2002 2:44:12 AM PDT by kassie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
bingo...This show how much fraud is needed in New York to elect the beast
10 posted on 10/17/2002 2:48:11 AM PDT by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
They're just pissed because it takes a lot of money to manufacture fake ID cards for their constituents.

It's hard to imagine anyone objecting to the notion that you need to provide some evidence of who you are in order to vote.

11 posted on 10/17/2002 2:56:52 AM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
So... now what do we do about all the mail in ballots?
13 posted on 10/17/2002 3:29:52 AM PDT by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I was watching Hardball last night because they were at Fordham University and Matthews asked McCain if Hillary should run for president. Before McCain could answer the whole audience boooed soooo loudly that Matthews was embarrased that he even said that he thought Hillary should run. That was the only good part of the show. The rest was a Matthews/McCain Bush Bash.
14 posted on 10/17/2002 3:31:20 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
But Clinton and Schumer said the bill would harm New York election law by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places.

"their names", their dead relatives, their pets, and names that they just make up. Ask South Dakota.

17 posted on 10/17/2002 3:42:56 AM PDT by kcordell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Several forms of ID currently acceptable in New York City.

A) Death certificate entitling one to vote in perpetuity for Democratic candidates.

B) Green Card entitling one to a quick $10 for each vote cast at each election district during election day.

C) Any valid expired tourist visa and acompanying communist party membership card from a fellow traveler party.

D) Welfare card entitling the bearer to extra food stamps for each vote cast for a Democrat.

E) Mexican consular identity card entitling the bearer to free beer for voting for the appropiate Democratic candidate.

F) NAACP membership card entitling bearer to a signed autographed picture of Jesse Jackson in exchange for voting Democrat.

Other programs are in the works to increase Democratic margins at the polls. Please send suggestions ASAP to the Democratic National Comittee. Accepted suggestions will entilte you to an autographed stained blue dress from Bill Clinton for women and a bottle of cyanide laced Kool Aid for men.

18 posted on 10/17/2002 3:51:16 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj
bump
19 posted on 10/17/2002 4:11:50 AM PDT by upier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
But Clinton and Schumer said the bill would harm New York election law by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places.

"Duhhh, what do I do know Boss?"

"Make your mark here, and pull the big lever with the Donkey on it!"

"Duhh, OK, uhhhh, sure thing Boss."

X

23 posted on 10/17/2002 4:30:12 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The bill, which would go into effect in 2004, was approved 92 to 2. It would provide funding to improve states' election systems and reduce voter fraud.

The money will no doubt come with Federal strings attached and shifting a little more power from the states to the central government. In the long run, this bill is more about control than elections. In the short run, it looks like it may hurt Hitlery.

24 posted on 10/17/2002 4:37:05 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; COB1; Bigun; Flyer; Humidston; Dog Gone; austingirl; BUSHdude2000; GOPcapitalist; ...
Under the bill's anti-fraud provisions, every voter would have to show a driver's license, Social Security card or other approved ID to be able to vote.

One small step in the right direction PING!

25 posted on 10/17/2002 4:39:55 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Seems like their vote will be great fodder for future campaign ads against them, if their opponents are smart enought to use it.
27 posted on 10/17/2002 5:02:07 AM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"This would make it more difficult FOR THE DEAD to vote in New York," Clinton told The Post.

Highlight her statement to reveal the hidden message!

28 posted on 10/17/2002 5:09:35 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
...by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places.

The democrat poll workers have a tables set up with names sorted by alphabet to make things go smooth.

They must have a separate table just for the people with the name "X"

30 posted on 10/17/2002 5:36:57 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Actual any smart Democrat would have voted against this bill. Any bill that reduces voter fraud is not good for the Democrats.
33 posted on 10/17/2002 5:51:42 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"The bill, which would go into effect in 2004, was approved 92 to 2. It would provide funding to improve states' election systems and reduce voter fraud."

This one line explains why Chuck and Hitlery voted against it!

36 posted on 10/17/2002 6:00:41 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The big problem isn't the unqualified voters. It's the minority dems who vote in 5 or 10 districts.

Vietnam had the right idea. When you noted, you got an indellible stamp on your wrist. If you had it, you couldn't vote again. Wore off in about 4 days.
37 posted on 10/17/2002 6:19:59 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson