Skip to comments.
CHUCK, HILL STUN DEMS ON ELEX BILL
New York Post ^
| 10/17/02
| VINCENT MORRIS
Posted on 10/17/2002 1:44:16 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:09:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
October 17, 2002 -- WASHINGTON - New York Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Charles Schumer were the only senators yesterday to vote against a historic election-overhaul bill they say will discourage minorities in New York from going to the polls.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: ambrose
"I wonder what that might be..." US passport, for one.
To: Cacique
I New York, the dead can "subscribe" to the 'Rat party, so they don't need to go to the trouble of getting themselves up every two years to vote.
22
posted on
10/17/2002 4:21:33 AM PDT
by
gridlock
To: kattracks
But Clinton and Schumer said the bill would harm New York election law by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places.
"Duhhh, what do I do know Boss?"
"Make your mark here, and pull the big lever with the Donkey on it!"
"Duhh, OK, uhhhh, sure thing Boss."
X
23
posted on
10/17/2002 4:30:12 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: kattracks
The bill, which would go into effect in 2004, was approved 92 to 2. It would provide funding to improve states' election systems and reduce voter fraud. The money will no doubt come with Federal strings attached and shifting a little more power from the states to the central government. In the long run, this bill is more about control than elections. In the short run, it looks like it may hurt Hitlery.
To: kattracks; COB1; Bigun; Flyer; Humidston; Dog Gone; austingirl; BUSHdude2000; GOPcapitalist; ...
Under the bill's anti-fraud provisions, every voter would have to show a driver's license, Social Security card or other approved ID to be able to vote. One small step in the right direction PING!
To: areafiftyone; kattracks
Matthews asked McCain if Hillary should run for president. Before McCain could answer the whole audience boooed soooo loudly that Matthews was embarrased that he even said that he thought Hillary should run. What a beautiful moment! LOL!
You think people are actually starting to understand who these xlintons & their dim cohorts actually are?
They're getting so brazen in their corruption, that even people who don't pay any attention have to be starting to pay attention.
26
posted on
10/17/2002 4:58:32 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
To: kattracks
Seems like their vote will be great fodder for future campaign ads against them, if their opponents are smart enought to use it.
27
posted on
10/17/2002 5:02:07 AM PDT
by
mombonn
To: kattracks
"This would make it more difficult
FOR THE DEAD to vote in New York," Clinton told The Post.
Highlight her statement to reveal the hidden message!
To: NY.SS-Bar9
Gosh, I wish the "blink" and "marquee" html still worked around here.............the moderators disabled it.
29
posted on
10/17/2002 5:28:28 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: kattracks
...by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places. The democrat poll workers have a tables set up with names sorted by alphabet to make things go smooth.
They must have a separate table just for the people with the name "X"
30
posted on
10/17/2002 5:36:57 AM PDT
by
JZoback
To: Sacajaweau
but who is going to ask them to explain their actions? ... as usual, they'll get away with it
To: JZoback
right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity This, in no way, proves the identity of the person. There are no "signature cards" on file, there are no handwriting experts working the polls. No way does signing a name "prove their identity."
You'll never get a direct answer to this fact, however.
32
posted on
10/17/2002 5:49:28 AM PDT
by
MrB
To: kattracks
Actual any smart Democrat would have voted against this bill. Any bill that reduces voter fraud is not good for the Democrats.
To: MrB
I live in Florida, home of "the dumb voter", when I vote my signture is checked via my voter registration card I filled out. You have to have a picture I.D. to vote.
34
posted on
10/17/2002 5:55:53 AM PDT
by
JZoback
To: JudyB1938
Student visa and/or pilot's license.
35
posted on
10/17/2002 5:56:06 AM PDT
by
lizma
To: kattracks
"The bill, which would go into effect in 2004, was approved 92 to 2. It would provide funding to improve states' election systems and reduce voter fraud."
This one line explains why Chuck and Hitlery voted against it!
To: kattracks
The big problem isn't the unqualified voters. It's the minority dems who vote in 5 or 10 districts.
Vietnam had the right idea. When you noted, you got an indellible stamp on your wrist. If you had it, you couldn't vote again. Wore off in about 4 days.
To: kattracks
"This would make it more difficult to vote
[more than once] in New York," Clinton told The Post.
I believe my addition to Hillary's quote is the real objection she and Chuckie have regarding having to show an I.D. to vote. In Virginia, I.D.s are required and the voting process is quick and easy when everyone has to show the election officer identification. Cuts out lots of voter fraud.
To: kattracks
THINK I'M GONNA . . . CRY!.
THE REPUBLICANS TOOK BACK THE SENATE.
HELP MAKE THIS HAPPEN! GO TO:
TakeBackCongress.org
A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate
To: kattracks
This would make it more difficult to vote multiple times in New York
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson