Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHUCK, HILL STUN DEMS ON ELEX BILL
New York Post ^ | 10/17/02 | VINCENT MORRIS

Posted on 10/17/2002 1:44:16 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:09:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

October 17, 2002 -- WASHINGTON - New York Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Charles Schumer were the only senators yesterday to vote against a historic election-overhaul bill they say will discourage minorities in New York from going to the polls.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: ambrose
"I wonder what that might be..."

US passport, for one.

21 posted on 10/17/2002 4:20:15 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
I New York, the dead can "subscribe" to the 'Rat party, so they don't need to go to the trouble of getting themselves up every two years to vote.
22 posted on 10/17/2002 4:21:33 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
But Clinton and Schumer said the bill would harm New York election law by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places.

"Duhhh, what do I do know Boss?"

"Make your mark here, and pull the big lever with the Donkey on it!"

"Duhh, OK, uhhhh, sure thing Boss."

X

23 posted on 10/17/2002 4:30:12 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The bill, which would go into effect in 2004, was approved 92 to 2. It would provide funding to improve states' election systems and reduce voter fraud.

The money will no doubt come with Federal strings attached and shifting a little more power from the states to the central government. In the long run, this bill is more about control than elections. In the short run, it looks like it may hurt Hitlery.

24 posted on 10/17/2002 4:37:05 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; COB1; Bigun; Flyer; Humidston; Dog Gone; austingirl; BUSHdude2000; GOPcapitalist; ...
Under the bill's anti-fraud provisions, every voter would have to show a driver's license, Social Security card or other approved ID to be able to vote.

One small step in the right direction PING!

25 posted on 10/17/2002 4:39:55 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone; kattracks
Matthews asked McCain if Hillary should run for president. Before McCain could answer the whole audience boooed soooo loudly that Matthews was embarrased that he even said that he thought Hillary should run.

What a beautiful moment! LOL!

You think people are actually starting to understand who these xlintons & their dim cohorts actually are?

They're getting so brazen in their corruption, that even people who don't pay any attention have to be starting to pay attention.

26 posted on 10/17/2002 4:58:32 AM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Seems like their vote will be great fodder for future campaign ads against them, if their opponents are smart enought to use it.
27 posted on 10/17/2002 5:02:07 AM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"This would make it more difficult FOR THE DEAD to vote in New York," Clinton told The Post.

Highlight her statement to reveal the hidden message!

28 posted on 10/17/2002 5:09:35 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9
Gosh, I wish the "blink" and "marquee" html still worked around here.............the moderators disabled it.
29 posted on 10/17/2002 5:28:28 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
...by eliminating the right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity at polling places.

The democrat poll workers have a tables set up with names sorted by alphabet to make things go smooth.

They must have a separate table just for the people with the name "X"

30 posted on 10/17/2002 5:36:57 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
but who is going to ask them to explain their actions? ... as usual, they'll get away with it
31 posted on 10/17/2002 5:39:23 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
right of voters to merely sign their names to prove their identity

This, in no way, proves the identity of the person. There are no "signature cards" on file, there are no handwriting experts working the polls. No way does signing a name "prove their identity."

You'll never get a direct answer to this fact, however.

32 posted on 10/17/2002 5:49:28 AM PDT by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Actual any smart Democrat would have voted against this bill. Any bill that reduces voter fraud is not good for the Democrats.
33 posted on 10/17/2002 5:51:42 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I live in Florida, home of "the dumb voter", when I vote my signture is checked via my voter registration card I filled out. You have to have a picture I.D. to vote.
34 posted on 10/17/2002 5:55:53 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Student visa and/or pilot's license.
35 posted on 10/17/2002 5:56:06 AM PDT by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The bill, which would go into effect in 2004, was approved 92 to 2. It would provide funding to improve states' election systems and reduce voter fraud."

This one line explains why Chuck and Hitlery voted against it!

36 posted on 10/17/2002 6:00:41 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The big problem isn't the unqualified voters. It's the minority dems who vote in 5 or 10 districts.

Vietnam had the right idea. When you noted, you got an indellible stamp on your wrist. If you had it, you couldn't vote again. Wore off in about 4 days.
37 posted on 10/17/2002 6:19:59 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"This would make it more difficult to vote [more than once] in New York," Clinton told The Post.

I believe my addition to Hillary's quote is the real objection she and Chuckie have regarding having to show an I.D. to vote. In Virginia, I.D.s are required and the voting process is quick and easy when everyone has to show the election officer identification. Cuts out lots of voter fraud.

38 posted on 10/17/2002 6:45:35 AM PDT by Angelwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
THINK I'M GONNA . . . CRY!.
THE REPUBLICANS TOOK BACK THE SENATE.

HELP MAKE THIS HAPPEN! GO TO:

TakeBackCongress.org

A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate

39 posted on 10/17/2002 6:46:21 AM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This would make it more difficult to vote multiple times in New York
40 posted on 10/17/2002 6:53:28 AM PDT by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson