Posted on 10/16/2002 12:12:29 PM PDT by vannrox
c="http://a799.ms.akamai.net/3/799/388/242d09bcd616f7/www.msnbc.com/news/1657534.jpg" border=1> Dinosaur Mummy shows some skin! Fossilized duckbill dinosaur provides rare clues about diet and appearance By Alan Boyle
The duckbill fossil, named Leonardo, is laid out for display at the Phillips County Museum in Montana. The numbers are keyed to information about areas of the 23-foot-long fossil. A separate portion of the tail can be seen in the background of the photo.
MSNBC
Oct. 14 A mummified dinosaur from Montana has revealed how the creature looked and how it lived 77 million years ago down to the texture of its skin and the contents of its stomach, scientists say.
NEWS OF THE DISCOVERY wowed scientists last week at the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologys annual meeting in Norman, Okla., said Nate Murphy, curator of the Phillips County Museum in Malta, Mont. He and two colleagues presented a technical description of the duckbill dinosaur fossil, nicknamed Leonardo, at the gathering.
People were making comments that this was revolutionary, Murphy told MSNBC.com on Monday. One scientist even went so far as to say this is like the Rosetta Stone of paleontology.
The Rosetta Stone, discovered in 1799, helped archaeologists decipher the hieroglyphs of ancient Egypt. Similarly, Leonardo could help paleontologists figure out the anatomy of a long-vanished species, Murphy said.
We have a (fossilized) cadaver or a corpse, and were experiencing CSI, he said, referring to the TV detective drama. Its a real crime investigation.
Only three other mummified dinosaur fossils are known to exist, the researchers said.
Mummified fossils are by no means like the linen- wrapped Egyptian remains from mere thousands of years ago. Rather, the specimens have turned to minerals in such a way that they preserve the look of the skin and internal tissue. In the past, scientists have theorized that mummified dinosaur flesh was dried out before it became a fossil. But Murphy and his fellow researchers believe Leonardo took a different path to posterity.
We think that it was buried in wet river sand around 77 million years ago, and much of the flesh was intact when fossilization started, said Dave Trexler, paleontologist with Timescale Adventures. The pollen from its stomach also shows that the environment was too wet for much desiccation to take place before burial.
This site map of Leonardo at excavation during 2001 shows where erosion removed a section of the tail, the only part missing from the otherwise complete animal.
Geologist Mark Thompson of the Judith River Dinosaur Institute said a very rare sequence of events was necessary for this type of preservation to occur. ... It is a once-in-a-lifetime find.
Volunteer fossil hunter Dan Stephenson spotted the first exposed traces of the two-ton, 23-foot-long (7-meter- long) specimen in a sandstone deposit during an institute expedition in the summer of 2000. He dubbed the fossil Leonardo after observing the name Leonard carved in a sandstone rock, with the date 1916, near the site of the discovery.
Paleontologists say Leonardo was a brachylophosaurus a type of duckbill dinosaur, or hadrosaur. The rock layer where the fossil was found has been dated back 77 million years, to the Late Cretaceous period, Murphy said.
An analysis of the fossilized bone structure led researchers to conclude that Leonardo was a subadult that died when it was about 3 or 4 years old. It still had what we call the cute factor, he said.
In a photo taken from video footage of the excavation, the left forelimb of Leonardo shows the polygonal, scaly appearance of the skin. A pencil is included in the picture for size comparison.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...
There ya go...playing the race card.......
just kidding
Sounds like my first wife. Did it have a "fossilized" purse with a lot of my money in it next to it? If so, could I have it back? The money that is. Not any of the rest of the stuff....
I'd much rather watch it from the comfort of my couch on the Discovery Channel -- with a cool drink in hand. <|:)~
Is everything fossilized, or is the pollen and maybe some other parts still made of organics?
Possibly this one (see "Alzadasaurus colombiensis")?
Only those that have been fed enough money. Can't get rid of them any other way.
As opposed to transparent?
Good. The article is much different than I first thought.
When I saw the title of the first post ["Mumified Dinosaur Found With Skin"], I thought it was a Democratic Underground article on Strom Thurmond.
lol... No offense, Strom.
Thurmonds still reproduce... Byrds have forgotten how to do the act.
Plant-eater, slow-moving... the duckbill was a democrat... much like the Carnahan and the Torcelli species.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.