Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

School Board Panel: Ohio Students Should Be Taught Evolution, Controversies That Surround It
Associated Press / ABC ^

Posted on 10/14/2002 4:59:49 PM PDT by RCW2001

The Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio Oct. 14 — A state school board panel Monday recommended that Ohio science classes emphasize both evolution and the debate over its validity.

The committee left it up to individual school districts to decide whether to include in the debate the concept of "intelligent design," which holds that the universe is guided by a higher intelligence.

The guidelines for the science curriculum simply put into writing what many school districts already do. The current guidelines do not even mention evolution.

"What we're essentially saying here is evolution is a very strong theory, and students can learn from it by analyzing evidence as it is accumulated over time," said Tom McClain, a board member and co-chairman of the Ohio Board of Education's academic standards committee.

Conservative groups, some of which had tried and failed to get biblical creation taught in the public schools, had argued that students should learn about intelligent design. But critics of intelligent design said it is creationism in disguise.

On Monday, the committee unanimously forwarded a final draft without the concept in it to the full 19-member board.

Board member Michael Cochran, who had pushed for intelligent design in the standards, said, "The amendment allows teachers and students in Ohio to understand that evolution really is a theory and that there are competing views and different interpretations. This allows them to be discussed."

The Ohio school board will decide Tuesday whether to adopt the new standards or order that they be revised.

On the Net:

Ohio Department of Education: http://www.ode.state.oh.us/



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 461 next last
To: whattajoke
Can we please add "Evolution = Communism" to that rule (I forget the guy's name) wherein if someone brings up Hitler they thereby lose said argument? So tiresome.

Not a bad idea, but they wouldn't get it. By the way, have you ever noticed that the evolution side of the debate, being the rational and mature side, never says equally idiotic things, such as: "Creationism = kiddy porn". (I've been tempted, but hey, there's no sport in kicking cripples.)

301 posted on 10/18/2002 12:47:27 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
I do not have the time nor the desire to teach you basic scientific concepts that you should have learned in elementary school. Neither do I have the time or the desire to get caught up pointing out and explaning the countless errors, half truths and misstatements at the link you provided. Its not my job to teach you science. I'm sorry you and the rest of the so-called "creationists" do not understand science. This is getting to be somewhat of a nuisance
302 posted on 10/18/2002 1:05:47 PM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ
medved is banned...

maybe you(squeaky wheel) could ask the authorities to reopen(grease) his account and try again!

Maybe the whiners/crybabies/liberal disrupters(axis/cult of evo/evil) should get IT(glue/weld job)!

303 posted on 10/18/2002 1:15:27 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; whattajoke

According to ID logic the conclusion is obvious: The Communists were right. Complex modern economies must be designed; they cannot evolve on their own from simpler beginnings.

253 posted on 10/18/02 1:54 AM Central by jennyp


Intelligent Design is to biology what Communism is to economics.

Think about it. Meditate on it. Turn it over & over in your head. But let me step out of the room first to avoid the shockwave...

255 posted on 10/18/02 2:15 AM Central by jennyp


Quoting the NY Times now? How can you claim to like their science without liking their politics, or are you also a communist?

298 posted on 10/18/02 2:14 PM Central by nanrod


Can we please add "Evolution = Communism" to that rule (I forget the guy's name) wherein if someone brings up Hitler they thereby lose said argument? So tiresome.

300 posted on 10/18/02 2:40 PM Central by whattajoke


304 posted on 10/18/2002 1:22:29 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Man! Evolution = communism = ID = the NY Times. The ol' consipracy is gettin' mighty crowded.
305 posted on 10/18/2002 1:44:58 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: All
Evolution = family values!
306 posted on 10/18/2002 2:13:58 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: All
Evolution = family values!

Not only that, but with special creation, homosexuality would be no problem at all to the continuity of the species. Need another generation? Just create it! Therefore ...

307 posted on 10/18/2002 2:16:47 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
LOL! OK, I take back post 255. But post 253 still holds. IDers understand biology the same way Communists understand economics: Neither group thinks that complex order can arise spontaneously out of chaos plus a few relatively simple rules of interaction. Hayek knew better.
308 posted on 10/18/2002 2:51:11 PM PDT by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Evolutionists like yourself just make it up as you morph along!
309 posted on 10/18/2002 2:53:36 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Banks and economic policies arose just as a random events and were coopted to solve economic problems. Yeah, I buy that.
310 posted on 10/18/2002 2:55:01 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
I'm waiting for the random free billion dollar giveaway.
311 posted on 10/18/2002 2:57:01 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
IDers understand biology the same way Communists understand economics: Neither group thinks that complex order can arise spontaneously out of chaos plus a few relatively simple rules of interaction. Hayek knew better.

I think that this interchange shows more of how the Darwinist looks at the world than how the ID'er (however you define that) looks at the world. I cannot imagine how anyone views economic institutions as evolving using random variation. Trial and error is not random. You don't use a hammer to to tighten a bolt of unknown size, but you may try several different sockets until you find the right one.

312 posted on 10/18/2002 3:08:26 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
to to = to (not a article of clothing) stutter boy.
313 posted on 10/18/2002 3:09:29 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Gay/morph america...science too!
314 posted on 10/18/2002 3:12:01 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Banks and economic policies arose just as a random events and were coopted to solve economic problems. Yeah, I buy that.

Nobody ever designed an industry. And yet several industries are locked into irreducibly complex relationships. For example, the oil & gas industry would collapse if you removed the cars & trucks that transport the gasoline to the gas stations and that use the gas to run. But the automobile industry would collapse if you removed the gas stations. Textbook example of economic irreducible complexity. It must have all been designed by a group (soviet?) of economic designers. Didn't it? (Where are the design documents? Was this an ad-hoc group or is there an ongoing Economic Design Bureau? And is this Bureau a private entity or a government one? etc.)

Likewise the checking system is locked in IC relationships with the computer industry, the trucking industry, the power generation industry, and others. Yet with all our intelligence, it still evolved from simpler systems.

Similarly, the stock market & just about every industry you can think of. Yet with all our intelligence, it still evolved.

315 posted on 10/18/2002 3:16:48 PM PDT by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
For example, the oil & gas industry would collapse if you removed the cars & trucks that transport the gasoline to the gas stations and that use the gas to run.

Are you thus allowing concepts as real objects? In any case, remove the oxygen from the atmosphere and the industry will collapse.

316 posted on 10/18/2002 3:26:01 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Yet with all our intelligence, it still evolved from simpler systems.

Every one of which evolved using our intelligence. No single person designed the car you drive.

317 posted on 10/18/2002 3:28:47 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
I think that this interchange shows more of how the Darwinist looks at the world than how the ID'er (however you define that) looks at the world. I cannot imagine how anyone views economic institutions as evolving using random variation.

True, there is much Lamarckian evolution going on - employees of one company or industry regularly learn about what the current best practices (or latest fad) are in their industry or in other industries. Plus employees engage in lateral meme transfer as they move on to different companies, and sometimes to different industries.

But if the literature of business history is littered with the stories of well-run companies that couldn't cope with a changing industry, changing marketplace, changing technologies - as well as stories of small companies that defied the odds to make it big, and in a few cases transform an industry.

Failure in business is the rule. This is true for small companies, but also for larger companies over longer timescales. The marketplace is a chaotic beast, despite the efforts of the best & brightest to navigate their companies thru the years.

And if the economy was a designed entity like you seem to believe it is, then Communism, or some other kind of technocratic or corporate-fascist dictatorship, would be a much more efficient system for maximizing the wealth of nations than free market capitalism.

318 posted on 10/18/2002 3:30:06 PM PDT by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
In any case, remove the oxygen from the atmosphere and the industry will collapse

But remove the industry and the oxygen will survive. :-)

319 posted on 10/18/2002 3:30:57 PM PDT by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
And if the economy was a designed entity like you seem to believe it is, then Communism, or some other kind of technocratic or corporate-fascist dictatorship, would be a much more efficient system for maximizing the wealth of nations than free market capitalism.

What "economy", describe what you are talking about. You are shotgunning terms and claims left and right.

320 posted on 10/18/2002 3:33:41 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson