[michaelt]

I posted this on the other thread too:

According to Eric Shawn on FNC, the NJSC decision basically says that they're doing this to preserve the two-party system - so both parties have a candidate.

Where in the law, where in the Constitution, does it say we have to have a two-party system? And where does it say that one of those parties has to be the Democrat Party?

The reason we have two main parties is because of the way we elect our representatives, not because its written anywhere.

And what about all the races that go uncontested in this country?

These idiot judges really reached. I guess I shouldn't be surprised......

[Political Junkie Too]

Where in the law, where in the Constitution, does it say we have to have a two-party system? And where does it say that one of those parties has to be the Democrat Party?

Does this mean that Walter Mondale should have dropped out in October and let someone else take his place? What's the difference between losing and losing big? Is it now the law that if you are losing big it is not in the interest of voters?

-PJ

[McLynnan]

the NJSC decision basically says that they're doing this to preserve the two-party system - so both parties have a candidate.

Both parties do have a candidate. Unfortunately one of them isn't man enough to take a loss.