To: Howlin
My opinion:
Forrester should disavow any further appeals and begin blasting Lautenberg with attack ads right away. I assume that the Greens and Libertarians will still proceed with their appeals.
148 posted on
10/02/2002 3:30:59 PM PDT by
ambrose
To: ambrose
I agree, actually. Let's campaign!
152 posted on
10/02/2002 3:32:04 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: ambrose
and begin blasting Lautenberg with attack ads right awayI agree. We should be playing reruns of Lautenburg explaining why he left the senate before and asking whats changed ?
To: ambrose
The Democrats should be made to publicly explain why Torricelli should be removed from the ballot but Mink should stay on.
-PJ
To: ambrose
I agree. Repubs should drop appeal (and a rich Repub should finance Libertarian appeal).
THen Forrester should immediately hammer on Lausenberg. Some ideas:
-Why didn't Lausenberg mention Iraq in his initial speech? Does he realize where this country is today? This isn't 1980.
-He should immediately "nicely" draw attention to Lausenberg's age.
-He should immediately demand a debate, and require that the Green party candidate be allowed (since the Dems' legal brief stressed electoral choice, why silence the greens?)
-He should trot out Lausenberg's quotes on why he left the Senate
-He should talk about being the "elected" not "selected" nominee.
More???
To: ambrose
agreed
234 posted on
10/02/2002 3:57:56 PM PDT by
tomkat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson