Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose
I agree, actually. Let's campaign!
152 posted on 10/02/2002 3:32:04 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
Look, if Forrester can't beat this walking corpse Lautenberg then he deserves to lose anyway.
162 posted on 10/02/2002 3:34:00 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
I haven't been able to read the thread, so forgive me if this has already been said, but..........

In the end, might this not be a good thing? It stinks to high heaven and anyone can see that, but I have to assume that the reason Torricelli was behind is because even former supporters are sick of corruption. Doesn't it stand to reason that this cheating tactic by the Demoncrats will not go over well?

Why would it take votes away from Forrester or give votes to Lautenberg?

This way, a Republican can still win and the Dems have no issue.

I think it could be a positive, except for the little matter (uh-hem !!!) of judicial activism. But merely as it pertains to the November election, I think this could be a winner.

If yesterday was any example of Lautenberg's upcoming campaign, I think a monkey could beat him. He was barely coherent.

217 posted on 10/02/2002 3:49:08 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson