In the end, might this not be a good thing? It stinks to high heaven and anyone can see that, but I have to assume that the reason Torricelli was behind is because even former supporters are sick of corruption. Doesn't it stand to reason that this cheating tactic by the Demoncrats will not go over well?
Why would it take votes away from Forrester or give votes to Lautenberg?
This way, a Republican can still win and the Dems have no issue.
I think it could be a positive, except for the little matter (uh-hem !!!) of judicial activism. But merely as it pertains to the November election, I think this could be a winner.
If yesterday was any example of Lautenberg's upcoming campaign, I think a monkey could beat him. He was barely coherent.
We felt the same way durin the 2000 debacle and the Clinton BS. The rats came out smellin like a rose. What makes you think they won't do the same here. It's the every vote must be counted, it's for the children, that's the american way..............etc,etc,etc!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's time to bump! and Boogie!
Other Democrat voters went to the Democratic primary to select their candidate to run for the office. Just because their candidate has withdrawn does not permit the RAT party to decree who has the best shot at proving to be a candidate of substance.
This is not the democratic way. I am a Republican but I vote democratically along with everyone else.
Point this hypocrisy of the "Democrats" appointing their candidates after the primary. Bad ruling. It cannot stand. It sets very dangerous precedent.