Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^ | 10/02/02 | TonyInOhio

Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: Huck
Our system is broke

A result of "Right Flight": we ceded government, academia, media, etc to the Left.

861 posted on 10/02/2002 9:25:54 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 811 | View Replies]

To: All
3rd Republican lawyer on. Each is better than the last.
862 posted on 10/02/2002 9:26:03 AM PDT by On the Road to Serfdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
I wasn't really criticizing you. We all make mistakes. I was just trying to figure out how it happened.
863 posted on 10/02/2002 9:26:07 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: KsSunflower
OK, I have new resepct for Libertarians. The Libertarins speech is making the fundamental points on denying politcal machines the means to abuse the laws meant to protect the voters.
864 posted on 10/02/2002 9:26:07 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: jdontom
Libertarian Party lawyer railing on the Dems argument that there is no choice if Toricelli stays on the ballot. Should be interesting to hear the justices reaction since all along they have dismissed 3rd parties as irrelevant and that there is no true choice if there isn't both a Repub and Dem on the ballot. She has a good argument but will get slammed down because she flies in the face of the justices' political ideology.
865 posted on 10/02/2002 9:26:18 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 842 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
Whoo. I just got back from lunch. Who's this lady talking? She is makeing a good point pointing out why we have a "Rule of Law"
866 posted on 10/02/2002 9:26:18 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Why isn't she a FReeper. Great arguments against demoncratic fraud.


"We've got it worked out. The fix is in. They offered to grease the skids."

867 posted on 10/02/2002 9:26:26 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]

To: agrace
The Libertarian is doing a great job on the law and on fair enforcement -- emphasizing that the third parties are held to every jot and tittle of the law, asks majors to be held to same standard. Too bad they will not listen to her!
868 posted on 10/02/2002 9:26:28 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
How is it going to play with Torch voters? I really don't know. I know that Torch hates Lautenberg & vice versa. But are these Torch voters per se, or are they Dems? If they're Torch voters, they'll stay home. If they're Dems they may march lock-step to the polls & vote for Lautenberg--it depends on what kind of a campaign he puts on to woo the dems back home. Or are they just fed up with all the legal hijinks and will say, "to hell with it?" It's too early to tell. I think most of the traditional dem & rino voters are in shock & don't know what to think or do. I'm sure they'll figure it out by Nov. 5th.
869 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:01 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
So if a Superbowl is lopsided by halftime, can the losing conference bring in a substitute team, to make the second half more 'fair'?

What if the quarterback is arrested before the game starts, can that team bring in an All-Star quarterback from a different team?

870 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:06 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: chris_in_nj; Miss Marple
If the Libertarian makes that argument, then it helps us out a lot. We can say, "It wasn't us, it was the Libertarians."
871 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:10 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies]

To: TX Bluebonnet
They sounds terribly uninformed.

I called the Clerk and asked why they were talking about logistics and not the law. She didn't have an answer.
872 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:11 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
Someone needs to fax or call Rush and tell him about the poll the NJ court is conducting. Reply 437 has the telephone number.

This is wild - A court taking a poll -

873 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:12 AM PDT by dhfnc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies]

To: chris_in_nj
Yep, she's bringing up EVERYTHING we all wish they'd address - Torricelli's withdrawal was a political one, primarily. Go lady go, whatever your name is. :)
874 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:24 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Here is the phone number for Forrester's headquarters: (609) 890-4699

I called to give my support, even though I'm from NY. I also expressed my outrage over the NJSC working as a Democrat team player. "How do we get what you want, DNC" legislation.

875 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:27 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies]

To: chris_in_nj
She's bringing up the "Clinton, Daschle, McGreevy" calls...this was a political decision to prevent the Dem. Senate losing power & control. it's not MY fault if Toricelli feels he can't continue...they can use write-in campaign--good arguments but the justices are probably thinking about what to order for lunch by now
876 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:42 AM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies]

To: chris_in_nj
She's the best lawyer so far -- and the most brutally honest! Maybe I will reregister Libertarian!
877 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:43 AM PDT by justanotherfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
I'm in CT and thought I could get the local NJ feed but I can't. The Libertarian lawyer is really laying the case on the line. Says Torch's choice is a POLITICAL one.

Given Barone's invoking of federal election statutes, what is your opinion as to whether the US supremes will hear this case after the kangaroo court decision?

878 posted on 10/02/2002 9:27:50 AM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
It's about having the money to buy anything. She slam dunked them. They're speechless
879 posted on 10/02/2002 9:28:05 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Ha! Libertarian Lady explaining the reasons for laws to them. Slamming Torcelli for trying to help Dems keep their majority and manipulate the outcome. Very good arguments.
880 posted on 10/02/2002 9:28:09 AM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,281-1,293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson