1 posted on
09/29/2002 12:50:10 PM PDT by
Torie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Torie
I was not aware that the American people lived under Russia, China, or France.
WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN'S FACE.
VOTE THE RATS
OUT!! DONATE TODAY
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate here by secure server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
3 posted on
09/29/2002 12:56:53 PM PDT by
terilyn
To: Torie
United Nations=League of Nations
4 posted on
09/29/2002 1:00:20 PM PDT by
11B3
To: Torie
Ok. They choose to be irrelevant. Russia, don't come crying when that $42 billion contract to develop Iraqi oil fields gets cancelled by the next Iraqi government and goes to American oil companies.
6 posted on
09/29/2002 1:04:35 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: Torie
The US revealed at the weekend that it wanted to give the Iraqi leader 30 days to open his borders to weapons inspectors under new, strict conditions, or face a military strike. Anyone that opposes the above resolution is an aider and abetter of a sociopath intent on trying to gain time to achieve a splashy and catastrophic final exit. I really believe that is Saddam's goal, and the legacy he is intent on leaving us.
7 posted on
09/29/2002 1:05:22 PM PDT by
Torie
To: Torie
As the Frogs say, c'est la vie.
8 posted on
09/29/2002 1:05:50 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: Torie
The United States was last night considering the implications of leading an attack on Iraq without the support of Russia, France and China, after all three rejected a US draft plan for dealing with President Saddam Hussein.
Look at the company they keep:Iraq defiantly rejected a U.S.-British plan Saturday for the United Nations to force President Saddam Hussein to disarm and open his palaces for weapons searches, warning the Baghdad would stage a fierce defense if the allies attacked.
Iraq Rejects Disarmament Plan
You're either with us, or you're with the terrorists!
To: Torie
Does anyone know how far from Baghdad Saddam's palaces are located? I'm sure quite a few are in the immediate area, but was wondering if any were isolated and could be taken by force and inspected during our initial assault.
If we did find ANYTHING incriminating, the rest of the cowering, socialist world would have to clam up about our actions, whatever they might be from that point on.
Nam Vet
12 posted on
09/29/2002 1:10:10 PM PDT by
Nam Vet
To: Torie
Heck, lets just evaluate this programatically:
Russia+China+France != United States
Sheesh, you'd think these pitiful countries would understand the cold, hard logic of our utter superiority by now.
13 posted on
09/29/2002 1:11:36 PM PDT by
egarvue
To: Torie
Russia, China and France? And we should care what they think why?????????????????
To: Torie
Three big powers? I only counted one and two-thirds.
To: Torie
Russia, France and China
Not that anymore need be said, but these three have some pretty obvious motives for saying we're wrong.
To: Torie
They just want "deal's".
Russia wants the $40B Iraq owes to them.
China wants a free (or more free) hand to deal with Taiwan and their "economic zone".
France wants to keep making money from Iraqi oil and to needle the US.
I think we can give Russia what they want - after an Iraqi occupation, a % of the Iraqi oil sales go to pay off Russia.
France will continue to make money after Iraq is occupied. They will continue to needle us, also.
China is the more problematic issue. We can make them promises...but at what cost?
So, I am sure the State dept. will try to get them all to agree. There is a time frame. If they don't - then screw 'em, the US goes it alone and the UN becomes the League of Nations. They don't want that to happen as the Security Council gives them a forum. So there is pressure on them, also.
To: Torie
Who cares what these backward cowards think? They were not bombed. We were. They can buzz off.
To: Torie
Fine.
Very well, the UK and USA, alone.
Regards, Ivan
27 posted on
09/29/2002 2:11:01 PM PDT by
MadIvan
To: Torie
Tell the three big powers to watch this and say the US wrong on Iraq
To: Torie
Russia, France and China
It's not surprising to see why Russia and China would be opposed to the interests of the U.S.: when the U.S. (and Great Britain) are successful, there will be one less region of the world to draw our attention away from them, one less region of the world for them to sell arms to. If GW's activities with the nations of West Africa are successful, we will have a challenge to China's activities with the Muslims in Africa and will also hurt the market for Russian oil.
As for France: the present French civilization is a fungus growing on the corpse of former glory. And let's not forget to remind the French, when they get all huffy about American cultural imperialism, that were it not for the American root stock sustaining their wine industry, it would long ago, like their empire, have dried up and blown away.
34 posted on
09/29/2002 2:34:14 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: Torie
Who cares what they think! Who have they ever rescued anyway??
Besides, we have the UK, Spain, Italy, Australia, and a multitude of smaller countries.
40 posted on
09/29/2002 4:47:09 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
To: Torie
Pardon me, but how exactly is France a "big power"???
To: Torie
Relevant or Irrelevant.
We have our final answer.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson