Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remarks by the President in Photo Opportunity with Secretary of State Colin Powell
The White House ^ | 19 September 2002 | President Bush's Remarks

Posted on 09/19/2002 7:54:57 AM PDT by PhiKapMom

Remarks by the President in Photo Opportunity with Secretary of State Colin Powell
The Oval Office

9:50 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. I appreciate our Secretary of State coming by to brief the Vice President and me and Condoleezza Rice about our progress in working with the United Nations, convincing the United Nations Security Council to firmly deal with a threat to world peace.

Before we talk about that, I do want to express our condolences to those who lost their lives in Israel. It's been back-to-back suicide bombings. We strongly condemn terror. We strongly condemn violence. And we continue to send our message to the good people of that region that if you're interested in peace, that if you want people to be able to grow up in a peaceful world, all parties must do everything they can to reject and stop violence.

At the United Nations Security Council it is very important that the members understand that the credibility of the United Nations is at stake, that the Security Council must be firm in its resolve to deal with a truth threat to world peace, and that is Saddam Hussein. That the United Nations Security Council must work with the United States and Britain and other concerned parties to send a clear message that we expect Saddam to disarm. And if the United Nations Security Council won't deal with the problem, the United States and some of our friends will.

That's the message the Secretary of State has delivered forcefully. That's the message that he will continue to carry.

And, Mr. Secretary, I appreciate your hard work. You're doing a fine job.

SECRETARY POWELL: Thank you, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: And we're proud of your efforts.

SECRETARY POWELL: Thank you, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: I'll be glad to answer a few calls -- answers, starting with Ron.

Q How many of our friends are willing to join the United States in this effort?

THE PRESIDENT: Ron, I think time will tell. I think you're going to see a lot of nations -- that a lot of nations love freedom. They understand the threat. They understand that the credibility of the United Nations is at stake. They heard me loud and clear when I said, either you can be the United Nations, a capable body, a body able to keep the peace, or you can be the League of Nations. And we're confident that people will follow our lead.

Q Sir, the chief weapons inspector is going to be briefing the U.N. Security Council today, and there have already been some reports that, in his talks with the Iraqis, that they're limiting access to certain sites. Are those reports true? And do you think they're trying to --

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I haven't gotten a report from what he intends to say. But let me give you just some general observations. First of all, there are no negotiations to be held with Iraq. They have nothing to negotiate. They're the people who said that they would not have weapons of mass destruction. The negotiations are over. It is up to the U.N. Security Council to lay out resolutions that confirms what Iraq has already agreed to, see.

Secondly, I don't trust Iraq, and neither should the free world. For 11 years, they have deceived the world. They have said, we'll conform to resolutions. They've never conformed to resolutions. They've never conformed to the agreement that they laid out 11 years ago. Sixteen times they've defied Security resolutions.

And so, they -- the burden of proof is -- must be place squarely on their shoulders. But there's no negotiations about whether or not they've been telling the truth or not.

Let's see here -- Mark.

Q Mr. President, are you going to send Congress your proposed resolution today? And are you asking for a blank check, sir?

THE PRESIDENT: I am sending suggested language for a resolution. I want -- I've asked for Congress' support to enable the administration to keep the peace. And we look forward to a good, constructive debate in Congress. I appreciate the fact that the leadership recognizes we've got to move before the elections. I appreciate the strong support we're getting from both Republicans and Democrats, and look forward to working with them.

Q Mr. President, how important is it that that resolution give you an authorization of the use of force?

THE PRESIDENT: That will be part of the resolution, the authorization to use force. If you want to keep the peace, you've got to have the authorization to use force. But it's -- this will be -- this is a chance for Congress to indicate support. It's a chance for Congress to say, we support the administration's ability to keep the peace. That's what this is all about.

Q Will regime change be part of it?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. That's the policy of the government.

Campbell, congratulations, you got two questions in one day. And it wasn't even a follow-up -- that's a brilliant performance.

END 9:56 A.M. EDT


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; presbush; sospowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
FYI! This is the transcript of this morning's mini press session with the President and SoS Powell without the spin of the press corps!
1 posted on 09/19/2002 7:54:57 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark; Alex P. Keaton; Dog Gone; MeeknMing; JohnHuang2; Mudboy Slim; OKSooner; VOA; ...
FYI!
2 posted on 09/19/2002 7:57:28 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Ole Okie; OKSooner; VOA; backhoe; Reagan Man; isthisnickcool; MinuteGal; JulieRNR21; ...
This is the Senate ping list which I am using to start the one for President Bush getting ready for the 2004 campaign.

If you want on or off either of these bump lists, please let me know!

One list is for the Senate elections

Second list is for President Bush/VP Cheney leading into the 2004 election which looks like it is beginning now
3 posted on 09/19/2002 8:02:06 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; Travis McGee; Squantos; Dukie; joanie-f
if the United Nations Security Council won't deal with the problem, the United States and some of our friends will.

Couldn't be any clearer than that. In diplomatic language, for the Presidednt no-less to say that, is like a big kick in the teeth.

Now, I just hope we are preparing for the full setting and are also preparing for Iran, Syria, Lybia, N. Korea and the Red Chinese if they want any part of this.

"If you are not with us, you are with the terrorists."

LET'S ROLL

4 posted on 09/19/2002 8:05:46 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I am with you 100%!!!!
5 posted on 09/19/2002 8:06:20 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I saw this just a few minutes ago, it was great! I love the fact that he's holding the UN's feet to the fire. If they don't come through with a hard resolution, they might as well all pack up and go home. The UN will be worthless. (Well, it already is, but they will be admitting it themselves)
6 posted on 09/19/2002 8:08:56 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; rintense; Dog; Chairman_December_19th_Society; Howlin; The_Victor; ohioWfan
Thanks! I was just getting ready to post this myself! Great comments, firm voice, and a twinkle in his eye when he said the bit about "a lot" of allies. Firm and emphatic support of Powell.

Pinging some people that may not be on either of your lists!

7 posted on 09/19/2002 8:09:46 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mombonn; ejo; Fiddlstix; lawgirl; Teacup; Miss Marple; Wait4Truth; TruthNtegrity; TXBubba; ...
A 'stick it to the UN' PING!
8 posted on 09/19/2002 8:11:46 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Please sign me up for both ping lists. Thanks.
9 posted on 09/19/2002 8:14:06 AM PDT by Boss_Jim_Gettys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Thanks, PhiKapMom, for the ping.

I watched our President make these remarks. What I REALLY appreciated was his clarity of purpose. There is NO equivocating, no wiggle room, no confusion. What is...is. How refreshing. I still Thank God, daily, for President George W. Bush.
10 posted on 09/19/2002 8:16:53 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I saw the President. I'm glad he stated that he wants the resolution to give him the authority to use force. He made it clear that this is the policy of the government. The RATS are on notice. Not all RATS are going to want this - Daschle will go crazy trying to get this off the table...I was happy last night to see Art Linkletter and the seniors in S.D. putting pressure on little tommy.
11 posted on 09/19/2002 8:19:52 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
First of all, there are no negotiations to be held with Iraq. They have nothing to negotiate.

I LOVE this guy!

12 posted on 09/19/2002 8:20:47 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
either you can be the United Nations, a capable body, a body able to keep the peace, or you can be the League of Nations.

I saw the whole thing on Fox and this was my favorite part!! Boy does Pres. Bush have backbone!!!

13 posted on 09/19/2002 8:22:05 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
But WAIT!

I thought Bush was a NWO traitor? I thought Bush was not a true conservative, yet indeed perhaps a liberal? And Powell? He was labeled a traitor of amazing proportion. I read the very same thing on Free Republic by any number of folks that Bush is as bad or worse than Clinton was. I WISH I HAD COMPILED A PING LIST OF THOSE NITWITS!!!

Now we stand on the precipice of Bush single handedly destroying all remaining credibilty of the UN, triggered by its own hypocrisy. Something unimaginable under Clinton or Gore or even Bush 41!!!

All those folks that screamed "US out of the UN" are getting dangerously close to getting their wish, and all I hear is crickets! Hello? Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

14 posted on 09/19/2002 8:23:03 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Coop
I thought you might be interested in this exchange...
15 posted on 09/19/2002 8:24:51 AM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; rintense
Please put me on both lists, PhiKap!

I saw this too. Man, do I love the no nonsense approach President Bush takes! Wimps (like Daschle) just buckle when confronted with real strength.

And the UN is proving to be as irrelevant as our President said it would be.

16 posted on 09/19/2002 8:25:00 AM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
"There are no negotiations to be held with Iraq."

This is the mark of a grand master negotiator.

17 posted on 09/19/2002 8:26:09 AM PDT by rmgatto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
:


"Well, that pretty much settles it ladies and gentlemen. We're gonna blow Saddam's ass away!"

:

18 posted on 09/19/2002 8:26:17 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Way to go W. I saw the exchange. It always amazing me that the President has to spell it out for the idiots in the press. "No negotiations." Well, duh.
19 posted on 09/19/2002 8:27:22 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
At the United Nations Security Council it is very important that the members understand that the credibility of the United Nations is at stake, that the Security Council must be firm in its resolve to deal with a truth threat to world peace, and that is Saddam Hussein. That the United Nations Security Council must work with the United States and Britain and other concerned parties to send a clear message that we expect Saddam to disarm. And if the United Nations Security Council won't deal with the problem, the United States and some of our friends will.

I just love this guy ..

20 posted on 09/19/2002 8:30:56 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson