Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Pundits Foresee Democrat Senate Majority
09-15-02 | Theodore R

Posted on 09/15/2002 12:14:04 PM PDT by Theodore R.

Jack Anderson in his nationally syndicated column predicts that the Republicans WILL retain the NC Senate seat being vacated by Jesse Helms. Elizabeth Dole, he says, should defeat the liberal choice, Erskine Bowles.

However, in TX, Anderson, once a partner of the liberal muckraker Drew Pearson, sees a real upset in the making, one, he says, that will give President Bush "heartburn." Anderson believes that the liberal Democrat Ron Kirk, former mayor of Dallas and a favorite of former liberal Governor Ann W. Richards, will upset the Republican nominee, Attorney General John Cornyn.The seat being contested was vacated by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1961, when he became vice president. Since then two long-term Republicans, John Tower and Phil Gramm, have hald the seat. But Anderson sees a Democrat resurgence. He does not mention the slow pace of campaigning by Cornyn.

John McLaughlin, whose PBS "Group" series, looks at election forecasts, sees a continuing Democrat Senate. In future weeks, the "Group" will single out specific races for analysis and prediction. Prior to his journalist and political careers, McLaughlin was a Catholic priest. In 1970, he failed in a bid for either the House or Senate from liberal RI.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrat; pundits; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2002 12:14:04 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Kirk is trying to paint Cornyn as a racist for backing action on Iraq. That tells me that Kirk is desperate and his internal polling is beginning to suck.

Perry is going to destroy Sanchez, and he'll have sufficient coattails to carry Cornyn into office.

BTW, I notice you scarf up every obscure source that predicts gloom-and-doom for Republicans. Jack Anderson hasn't been a serious political commentator since he thought somebody was trying to assassinate him.

2 posted on 09/15/2002 12:18:33 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; Constitution Day
Jack Anderson? I thought he was DEAD.
3 posted on 09/15/2002 12:20:12 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"John McLaughlin, whose PBS "Group" series, looks at election forecasts, sees a continuing Democrat Senate."

Another example of staying past one's shelf life?????

4 posted on 09/15/2002 12:40:43 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Not only are the "pundits" dead wrong in predicting that the Democrats will retain control of the Senate, it will be known that they are wrong by about 3 p.m. Eastern on election day.

I am assuming, with good cause, that Drudge or someone else on the Internet will break the embargo on the results of the exit polls that are conducted once in the morning and again in the afternoon at key precincts in key races across the country. If so, word will get out between 3 and 3:30 that Forrester has defeated Torricelli in New Jersey.

The Torch is, of course, campaigning on the idea that no matter how bad he is, the people of New Jersey should reelect him to prevent the (nasty) Republicans from retaking the Senate. The same argument is being made by other Democrat candidates for Senate, across the country.

Once Torricelli goes down in flames, the Senate is back in Republican hands UNLESS the Democrats take more seats from the Republicans than the Republicans take from the Democrats. The Republicans have, arguably, three seats at risk -- Arkansas, Colorado, and Texas. The Democrats also have three seats at risk (other than New Jersey) -- Minnesota, Missouri, and South Dakota.

The Republicans are all in a statistical tie in their "at risk" seats. The Democrats are all down in the polls in their "at risk" seats (unless Johnson is now statistically tied with Thune in South Dakota). If Torricelli goes down, early, the "Save us from a Republican Senate" argument goes down with him.

The Senate slap-down of Texas Supreme Court Judge Priscila Owen by the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee will savage the Democrat in Texas. She is very popular in Texas; remember that state has elections for its judges. And it will also hurt the Democrat in Missouri; the only thing keeping the Widow Carnahan in the race there is the gender gap of women preferring her over Talent. He will hang the defeat of Judge Owen around her neck like a long-dead albatross (insert Monty Phython riff, here).

When Torricelli goes down, Daschle goes down with him. And the momentum from the Torricelli loss -- spread by the Internet and talk radio -- will bring down other Democrat candidates with them.

I stand by my prediction, made in writing here last November, that the Republicans "will gain 1-3 seats in the Senate" and will take control.

I hope the political assassination of Judge Owen does sink Jean Carhahan in Missouri. As mentioned on other threads, that is a "special election" and Talent would be seated immediately rather than waiting until January, so the Republicans can reorganize the Senate BEFORE the lame duck session which will take place in November.

Congressman Billybob

Click for major article on turnover in the House of Representatives: "Til Death Do Us Part."

Click for latest column: "The Star-Spangled Banner, Part II, & More Lies from the Media"

5 posted on 09/15/2002 12:41:58 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I reckon we're going to pick up Carhahan, Torricelli and Wellstone's seats. All others will be a wash.
6 posted on 09/15/2002 12:44:53 PM PDT by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Forgot South Dekota, too
7 posted on 09/15/2002 12:45:39 PM PDT by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I hope you're right...on all counts.
8 posted on 09/15/2002 1:02:01 PM PDT by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Kirk played the race card, Sink is exactly right, his internal polling is in the dumper.
9 posted on 09/15/2002 1:05:19 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
The Republicans have, arguably, three seats at risk -- Arkansas, Colorado, and Texas.

I think the polls show that Republican seats in Oregon and New Hampshire are more at risk then our seat in Colorado. Aslo the Texas polls still show a high number of undecided votors. With Kirk trying to racially politicize the war with Iraq I think you will see his numbers sink as we get closer to election day.

10 posted on 09/15/2002 1:11:48 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
We don't need a McKenny in Texas.We need John Cornyn a true blue Texan."LETS ROLL"
11 posted on 09/15/2002 1:18:52 PM PDT by solo gringo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"BTW, I notice you scarf up every obscure source that predicts gloom-and-doom for Republicans"

Yep. More than a coinky dink I think...

12 posted on 09/15/2002 1:44:34 PM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: everyone
Is it possible to find anywhere a breakdown of the close races in terms of how much money they have? I feel the need to donate to many candidates but I don't know which ones need the money more.
13 posted on 09/15/2002 1:57:14 PM PDT by UofORepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Hmmm....I seem to remember that your pre-election optimism was not at all borne out by the 1998 and 2000 election results. If so, perhaps more humility is in order this time around. Please correct me if my memory is wrong on this.
14 posted on 09/15/2002 2:01:43 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
I reckon we're going to pick up Carhahan, Torricelli and Wellstone's seats. All others will be a wash.

And of course Johnson in SD like you said.

When is Daschle up for re-election. I truly believe he is finished. He has been too much of an obstructionists for the South Dakotans to handle. But, of course, he does bring home the pork--even for the loggers.

15 posted on 09/15/2002 2:02:39 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Hmmm....I seem to remember that your pre-election optimism was not at all borne out by the 1998 and 2000 election results. If so, perhaps more humility is in order this time around. Please correct me if my memory is wrong on this.

I didn't forecast anything in 1998, and the folks I picked in 2000, won.

Rick Perry is GOING to be re-elected governor of Texas, and Ron Kirk is beginning to self-destruct by playing the race card because he can't get traction any other way.

I can't speak to the reliability of your memory.

16 posted on 09/15/2002 2:08:30 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
He is Dead. Dead wrong.
17 posted on 09/15/2002 2:20:28 PM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I did too. Maybe he made these predictions before he died.

- Gin

18 posted on 09/15/2002 2:27:29 PM PDT by Allrich Towing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
"The Democrats also have three seats at risk (other than New Jersey) -- Minnesota, Missouri, and South Dakota."

What about GA and the chances for Saxby Chambliss defeating Max Cleland? Anyone have any data on that?

19 posted on 09/15/2002 3:17:21 PM PDT by Reo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reo
chances for Saxby Chambliss defeating Max Cleland

Despite GOP hopes, Cleland will win comfortably. Agree on 3 GOP pickups above (Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey), plus Thune will win in South Dakota. Senate: R-53; D-46, I-1

20 posted on 09/15/2002 3:32:53 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson