Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Explosion at Freeport Texas chemical plant

Posted on 09/13/2002 8:23:48 AM PDT by newsperson999

lots of smoke..they said it may be a railcar but it looks like more than that..I saw at least 2 areas where smoke is rising..30-40 yards apart..it looked like a small sturcture on fire as well as the railcar


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: freeport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
No stats but there appears to be enough to genarate some google hits. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22chemical+plant+explosions%22+&btnG=Google+Search
101 posted on 09/13/2002 10:09:31 AM PDT by radmanptn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hflynn
I've already been given rational data, with no flames attached, and was ready to move on, concluding that yes, chemical plant explosions are more common than I thought. Flames were not very informative. Your wisdom was actually not very enlightening. But I see now I must spell things out to you with colored crayons:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/749919/posts

Three held at Alligator Ally:

"They were mourning on 9/11 and there will be mourning again on 9/13"

At the same time, we have a radioactive ship that is puzzling radiation experts.

I'm glad that people are working for calm, but flamers are not cooling me down one bit, sir.

Any disaster today must be looked at closely for possible terrrorist activity. If you think we need to discuss that further, fine. I'll check in on your brilliant remarks later.
102 posted on 09/13/2002 10:11:05 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
Thank you Moderator...:)
103 posted on 09/13/2002 10:11:57 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radmanptn
TY for the info. Freegards....
104 posted on 09/13/2002 10:12:27 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SouthernFreebird; phasma proeliator
The name, "Bush", is connected with each target

Thats it,....... I'm shaving.


Ya know, posts like that should come with a warning stating "don't drink anything while reading this". ROFLMAO
105 posted on 09/13/2002 10:22:28 AM PDT by da_toolman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Sorry, but I think you have to realize is most people dismiss any and all "incidents" as terrorism because it goes against their self-theraputic approach to life. It's easier to say horrific loss of life like the terror attacks on 9/11 just will NEVER happen again here. So any chemical plant explosions, airplane crashes, train derailments, etc etc......just.............happen.

It's amazing how the "liberally biased" media is reviled (as it should be) on this webboard, yet this same media is trusted when the offical view is reported. It's just easier to accept terrorism can't happen again.

I'm not saying this chemical plant explosion IS terrorism, I have no proof of anything. I'm just following the news like everyone else is. But with the American Military at Defcon 2 status.......well......like I said, it's just a lot easier to dismiss it all. Much easier than asking questions anyway.

106 posted on 09/13/2002 10:23:43 AM PDT by Dazedcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Dazedcat
Sorry, but I think you have to realize is most people dismiss any and all "incidents" as terrorism because it goes against their self-theraputic approach to life. It's easier to say horrific loss of life like the terror attacks on 9/11 just will NEVER happen again here. So any chemical plant explosions, airplane crashes, train derailments, etc etc......just.............happen.Not true of FR, at all. In fact, it's clear that people sub-consciously are LOOKING for the next terrorist incident around here, attack anyone presenting evidence that any incident is not terrorist-related, and get rather upset when a potential terrorist incident turns out not to be a terrorist incident and petulantly start tossing about accusations of government "coverups"; can easily be seen by how long people desperately clung to the Ft. Smith plane diversion and the "radioactive ship" being terrorist related long after it was clear neither incident was.

The people here who have dismissed the BASF explosion as being terrorist related are simply people who logically realize that explosions and fires, even very large ones, are a routine byproduct of chemical production.

107 posted on 09/13/2002 10:27:37 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I've already been given rational data, with no flames attached, and was ready to move on, concluding that yes, chemical plant explosions are more common than I thought. Flames were not very informative. Your wisdom was actually not very enlightening. But I see now I must spell things out to you with colored crayons:

Yeah right, your rational data (The name, "Bush", is connected with each target.)

The reason my wisdom may not have been very enlightening to you is because it wasn't wisdom, it was LOGIC.

I had hoped using crayons would have improved your spelling but alas even I can be illogical.

108 posted on 09/13/2002 10:34:25 AM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Dazedcat
Like you said, who knows about this one? I'd say the odds are like 10% that this is terrorist related after reading post 74. Freegards....
109 posted on 09/13/2002 10:34:38 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999; Prodigal Daughter; Thinkin' Gal; Alouette; dennisw; SJackson; Zad; happygrl; ...
>Explosion at Freeport Texas chemical plant

Try a Google Advanced Search for this string:  BASF "Zyklon-B"

Pr 6:27 Can a man take fire in his bosom, and his clothes not be burned?

110 posted on 09/13/2002 10:35:19 AM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999
Ammonia is not flammable.
111 posted on 09/13/2002 10:37:15 AM PDT by KansasConservative1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999
...there was a leaking ammonia tank

The fumes could be deadly. I lived in Houston when an ammonia tanker turned over and fell off a ramp near the Galleria on the Southwest Freeway. Many people were killed from the fumes. A mom in my son's school was blinded by the vapors. I remember the TV newcasts zeroing in on a man lying face down, dead, on freeway where he had tried to run from his car and was overcome. I thought how horrible it would be if his wife recognized him by his sportjacket on the evening news before she had been notified by law enforcement.

112 posted on 09/13/2002 10:39:51 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
...ammonia explodes with fertilizer and a detonator.

Or in a collision, as when the ammonia tanker took the turn too fast in the 1970s in Houston and tipped over and fell of a ramp on the Southwest Freeway in Houston. Nobody, except the driver, was hurt or killed in the accident; but the fumes killed or injured many people.

113 posted on 09/13/2002 10:49:43 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: hflynn
When terrorists target a day, flame at people who are suspicious of explosions? I simply do not understand your logic. And when it comes to spelling, you remind me of an enviro-wacko I saw in a movie. "My God in heaven! Don't you see that sign is marked 'recycling'?!"
114 posted on 09/13/2002 11:17:06 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
"At the same time, we have a radioactive ship that is puzzling radiation experts."

I believe the source of radioactivity from the ship turned out to be radon-contaminated clay tiles. Happens frequently when you dig your clay in the wrong place. Radon occurrs naturally. I'm from Philly. Trust me, radon is plenty plentiful.

115 posted on 09/13/2002 11:18:34 AM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Thank you for the valuable information. It's so refreshing to have a rational discussion.
116 posted on 09/13/2002 11:18:44 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Yep. And they just reported that nothing bad happened in Florida either. Yep. Nothing to see here. Move along. Move along. Just some bricks. The dogs smelled a cat in Florida. Yep. Nadda. Zip. Got some swamp water to sell you.
117 posted on 09/13/2002 11:20:14 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
What is being flamed Moroon is your galactically stupid conclusion (which was so idiotic even you had the intelligence to remove it from your current posts) that "The name, "Bush", is connected with each target.".

It's perfectly obvious to everybody else on this thread that the people responsible for all of these events all DRANK MILK WHEN THEY WERE BABIES!!!!!!! So be on the lookout for anyone drinking milk.

118 posted on 09/13/2002 11:32:31 AM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: NFifty15
You need to get a life too!! I live around chemical plants and these explosions have been happening for the last 30 years

I agree. I once had to go to the Exxon Baytown chemical plant for some consulting work. In order to actually get into the plant the first time (and get a pass for future times) you have to watch a 20 minute or so safety video. Sabatoge is way down the list of causes of chemical plant explosions.

119 posted on 09/13/2002 11:32:48 AM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
I did see your post #64. You said it's a government web site and all lies. So...?

Sorry, I guess I forgot the sarcasm tag that is required to indicate humor... Go to the site and learn how many plants blow up every single day in our country and in the world.

120 posted on 09/13/2002 11:35:52 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson