Conspiracy Theorists: WHAT DID HAPPEN TO FLIGHT 93?

The UK Mirror ^ | Thursday, 12 September 2002 | Richard Wallace

[chemainus]

This is true. I was glued to the news reports because my daughter was in the building next to the Pentagon and all the reports said the plane was shot down....

[chemainus]

CNN ? LMFAO

[Rokke]

Reports also said a car bomb had gone off in front of the State Department and that the 757 that hit the Pentagon was a twin engined prop plane. Do you believe those too?

[chemainus]

you don't have to see a smoke streak...that means little

[chemainus]

Your attitude just pisses me off...several times today

[Camber-G]

Pictures can be altered

[chemainus]

again , an intelligent person....a supersonic plane IS seen first and heard later...and distances can be deceiving...50 feet or 500 feet to an amateur...and gray in sunlight at high speed often looks white

[Rokke]

A supersonic aircraft at 50ft would have blown her eardrums out, and at 500ft would have shattered windows for miles. Did either of those things happen?

[Spirited]

I figure a worm caused the sonic boom and a ton of engine skipped and bounced for over a mile to get away from the crash site while a contrary wind flipped the debris back 8 miles over lake and all.
The passenger caller really heard only a hiccup onboard and the FBI knows there was no white plane so they injected/projected something about a Fairchild Falcon 20 just for their own amusement.
That allows anyone to believe everything they want!

[chemainus]

"Thanks for the picture. It seals, once and for all, the fact that the Flight 93 was not shot down."-sinkspur........The Gospel according to sinkspur? why thank you Your Majesty...this dogmatic attitude , whether you are right or wrong, so prevalent among the cognoscenti here on FR, abrogates any legitimacy of thought and action here....FR has about the same reputation for logical and thoughtful believability as Scott Ritter... and this is a shame because I have read posts from some very very smart , logical and seasoned people on this site

[chemainus]

You would only have a smoke streak if there was fire burning incompletely...High explosives, directed charge can do damage without the Hollywood visual effects

[Rokke]

Better tell that to the witnesses reported in this article who insist flight 93 was trailing fire and smoke.

[chemainus]

That's funny, I have property in Southwest Virginia and the fighters routinely use a valley there to line up for training /bombing runs...I have never had a window broken and I assure you my eardrums are still there....let the discussion continue without out of hand dismissal please

[Oztrich Boy]

"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around.

They've given it a paint job, but I've FOUND it!

Looks like International Rescue didn't make it in time.

[chemainus]

I believe witnesses see and hear different things but there is a root cause..in this case a plane slammed into the Pentagon...who cares if it is a prop or a slow( because of the turn)moving jet...and by the way, your changing the topic is called derailing...it automatically loses

[Minutemen]

That picture is not conclusion that flight 93 wasn't shot down.The article quotes a man working a half mile away from the impact as saying "there was a 10 mph breeze blowing".
Any wisp of white smoke or fuel vapor trailing the disabled craft would surely have been dissipated by a breeze that strong 30 seconds after impact.

[chemainus]

Is that a REAL plane ??

[Rokke]

Because the fighters flying over your property in Southwest Virginia are not flying supersonic. You are arguing that the aircraft that flew over the lady's head was initially silent because it was supersonic. If it was, she'd now be deaf.

[chemainus]

I'm tired of the circular arguing...I have had subsonic planes right over me and I swear I blocked out the noise and focused on something like a missile configuration I had never seen before, the pilot, new markings ...a lot of things.... there were official reports that the plane was regretfully shot down ....there was an INORDINATELY LONG period of time before the details of the heroism were "discovered" . The details leaked out in typical government lie fashion, a snippet at a time to see what played well in Peoria. Does the government Lie ? All the time. And that , my countryman, is far far far more dangerous than terrorism; it is terrorism itself and a Brave New World. If you don't admit that, we have absolutely no common ground, and that's OK too.

[pittsburgh gop guy]

Article is BS. The flight was NOT shot down, as the sane here have noted.

"10.06am it crashed at Shanksville, less than 10mins flying time from Washington""

Uh - Shanksville is about 140 miles from DC - that is MORE than 10 minute flight time from Washington, even at 575 mph.

"THE BLACK BOXS
Sources claim the last thing heard on the cockpit voice recorder is the sound of wind - suggesting the plane had been holed"

What "sources"? This is made up.

"THE SONIC BOOM
The FBI insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles away from Shanksville."

Where to start with this one? A sonic boom at 9:22am would mean nothing - the flight crashed 40 minutes later! Why would jets be in the area a FULL FORTY MINUTES before they were to shoot Flight 93 down there? Also - I have never heard of said "earthquake monitor" - and I doubt they would even detect sonic booms. But even if they do - it does not matter because one does not exist for Shansville.

I live in the closest media market to Shanksville, and the local media did a lot of coverage interviewing the townsfolk that SAW IT GO DOWN. And no one has said anything about a missile or it being shot down. But I guess all the good people of Shanksville, the same town where the miners were trapped, were in on it. Maybe the mine rescue was devised by the CIA/NSA to divert attention from the true story (shoot-down) of Flight 93. Yeah, maybe those 9 miners were gonna tell the truth and had to be dealt with. Yeah, that's it, that's the ticket.

Uh oh, time to replace my tin-foil, I can feel the radio waves attacking my hair follicles.