Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War Party's imperial plans
World Net Daily ^ | 9/11/2002 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 09/11/2002 3:32:38 PM PDT by traditionalist

The fires had not yet gone out at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, a year ago, before the War Party had introduced its revised plans for American empire. What many saw as a horrific atrocity and tragedy, they saw instantly as an opportunity to achieve U.S. hegemony over an alienated Islamic world.

President Bush initially directed America's righteous wrath and military power at al-Qaida. But in his "axis-of-evil" address, he signed on to the War Party's agenda.

What lies ahead? When America invades Iraq, it will have to destroy Saddam and all his weapons of mass destruction. Else, the war will have been a failure. And to ensure destruction of those weapons, we must occupy Iraq. If you would see what follows, pull out a map.

With Americans controlling Iraq, Syria is virtually surrounded by hostile powers: Israel on the Golan, Turks and Kurds to the north, U.S. power to the west in Iraq and south in Jordan. Syrian President Assad will be forced to pull his army out of Lebanon, leaving Israel free to reinvade Lebanon to settle accounts with Hezbollah.

Now look to Iran. With Americans occupying Iraq, Iran is completely surrounded: Americans and Turks to the west, U.S. power in the Gulf and Arabian Sea to the south, in Afghanistan to the east and in the old Soviet republics to the north. U.S. warplanes will be positioned to interdict any flights to Lebanon to support Hezbollah.

Iraq is the key to the Middle East. As long as we occupy Iraq, we are the hegemonic power in the region. And after we occupy it, a window of opportunity will open – to attack Syria and Iran before they acquire weapons of mass destruction.

This is the vision that enthralls the War Party – "World War IV," as they call it – a series of "cakewalks," short sharp wars on Iraq, Syria and Iran to eliminate the Islamic terrorist threat to us and Israel for generations.

No wonder Ariel Sharon and his Amen Corner are exhilarated. They see America's war on Iraq as killing off one enemy and giving Israel freedom to deal summarily with two more: Hezbollah and the Palestinians. Two jumps ahead of us, the Israelis are already talking up the need for us to deal with Libya, as well.

Anyone who believes America can finish Saddam and go home deceives himself. With Iraq's military crushed, the country will come apart. Kurds in the north and Shi'ites in the south will try to break away, and Iraq will be at the mercy of its mortal enemy, Iran. U.S. troops will have to remain to hold Iraq together, to find and destroy those weapons, to democratize the regime, and to deter Iran from biting off a chunk and dominating the Gulf.

Recall: After we crushed Germany and Japan in World War II, both were powerless to reassume their historic roles of containing Russia and China. So, America, at a cost of 100,000 dead in Vietnam and Korea, had to assume those roles. With Iraq in ruins, America will have to assume the permanent role of Policeman of the Persian Gulf.

But is this not a splendid vision, asks the War Party. After all, is this not America's day in the sun, her moment in history? And is not the crushing of Islamism and the modernization of the Arab world a cause worthy of a superpower's investment of considerable treasure and blood?

What is wrong with the War Party's vision?

Just this: Pro-American regimes in Cairo, Amman and Riyadh will be shaken to their foundations by the cataclysm unleashed as Americans smash Iraq, while Israelis crush Palestinians. Nor is Iran likely to passively await encirclement. Terror attacks seem certain. Nor is a militant Islam that holds in thrall scores of millions of believers from Morocco to Indonesia likely to welcome infidel America and Israel dictating the destiny of the Muslim world.

As for the pro-American regimes in Kabul and Pakistan, they are but one bullet away from becoming anti-American. And should the Royal House of Saud come crashing down, as the War Party ardently hopes, do they seriously believe a Vermont-style democracy will arise?

Since Desert Storm, America has chopped its fleets, air wings and ground troops by near 50 percent, while adding military commitments in the Balkans, Afghanistan, the Gulf and Central Asia. Invading and occupying Iraq will require hundreds of thousands of more troops.

We are running out of army. And while Americans have shown they will back wars fought with no conscripts and few casualties, the day is not far off when they will be asked to draft their sons to fight for empire, and many of those sons will not be coming home. That day, Americans will tell us whether they really wish to pay the blood tax that is the price of policing the War Party's empire.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: arab; arabs; iraq; israel; middleeast; neareast; neocons; neoconservatives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-268 last
To: All
And as we all gnaw on the dessicated bones of the Old Republic we might want to take a gander at how the Republican Party is enlarging the Tent here in the Homeland:

whitey is opressing people of color just by being alive--and the Republicans wanna do something about it!!!

".. The commercial was paid for by a Republican political action committee and aired in the Kansas City area on an urban contemporary station whose listeners are predominantly black....

"You've heard about reparations, you know, where whites compensate blacks for enslaving us," the ad says. "Well guess what we've got now. Reverse reparations." The commercial says blacks earn thousands of dollars less in retirement benefits than whites because they have shorter life spans.

"So the next time some Democrat says he won't touch Social Security, ask why he thinks blacks owe reparations to whites," the ad says...."

261 posted on 09/13/2002 3:03:07 PM PDT by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
Thanks for that link. Lind is among the best of the best when it comes to deconstructing the deconstructors (ie, Frankfurt School cultists).
262 posted on 09/13/2002 3:14:41 PM PDT by Phillip Augustus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: DentsRun
an interesting column. Any idea why it was pulled? not a clue ....
I just happen to be reading it when it was pulled so it was still in my cache, there were no replies or flaming ect... something just hit the mod , did you see anything out of the way?

263 posted on 09/13/2002 3:19:12 PM PDT by THEUPMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: rmvh
You are right, radical Islamists are a huge threat. That is why I support the war on terror. We need to root out radical Islamic groups wherever they may lie.

But Saddam Hussein is not a radical Islamist. He has a record of regularly killing them in his country. Radical Islamists seek the overthrow of secular regimes such as his. So your argument is a non-sequitur.

264 posted on 09/14/2002 9:44:42 AM PDT by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: DentsRun
He doesn't need a missile to attack us with nukes. He just has to put the nuke in a shipping container on a boat headed for New York harbor (or Norfolk, Jacksonville, etc.). In this case, there's nothing we could do to stop the attack unless the Coast Guard happens to inspect and search that ship. I don't think we can inspect all the ships entering our ports. Please see my post #79.
265 posted on 09/16/2002 11:42:06 AM PDT by defenderSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
He doesn't need a missile to attack us with nukes. He just has to put the nuke in a shipping container on a boat headed for New York harbor (or Norfolk, Jacksonville, etc.). In this case, there's nothing we could do to stop the attack unless the Coast Guard happens to inspect and search that ship. I don't think we can inspect all the ships entering our ports.

Well I wonder. If Hussein were that intent on committing suicide, he could have put 20,000 pounds of plastic explosive in a shipping container anytime in the last ten years and had one hell of an explosion. He doesn't have to wait until he has a nuc. Don't we check shipping containers? Otherwise what's there to prevent people from sending in anthrax, fertilizer bombs, plastic bombs, AK-47s, mortar rounds and short range missiles?

Even if it were easy to get a weapon of mass destruction to the United States in a ship, I still don't understand what's in it for Hussein. Whatever else is wrong with the man he's not a religious fanatic dreaming of 72 virgins. He wants to be remembered for a 1000 years as the heroic leader who saved Iraq, not as the damn fool who got himself (and his country) incinerated in a retaliatory nuclear blast.

266 posted on 09/16/2002 4:51:33 PM PDT by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: DentsRun
An attack with a nuke in a shipping container wouldn't necessarily be suicidal. In a really tight covert operation, there might not be enough evidence for us to figure out conclusively who attacked us. Remember, all the physical evidence would be destroyed in the blast (and I mean all of it...no truck axles left behind like in Oklahoma City). And we can't just vaporize Baghdad or any other place without conclusive evidence of their guilt. These are the scenarios that the pentagon evaluates constantly. Cheney has talked a great deal about the threat of nuclear attack and blackmail by Iraq. Don't think it can't happen just because it hasn't happened yet. The coffee's brewing my friend...take a whiff and wake up.
267 posted on 09/17/2002 1:56:26 PM PDT by defenderSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: traditionalist
But Saddam Hussein is not a radical Islamist. He has a record of regularly killing them in his country..

Hussein's religious deity is Huseein.....He simply uses Islam as a convenient tool to feed to his subjets so that in combination with brute terror, they do his bidding......And by the way, he kills anybody and everybody who stands in his way.....even family members.

Islam is really not on balance a religion...It is a despotic political system masking as a religion which is why I call it "the relgion of death."

Have a pleasant evening.

268 posted on 09/17/2002 5:20:21 PM PDT by rmvh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-268 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson