Skip to comments.
Frist sees GOP capturing Senate
The Washington Times ^
| 9/8/2002
| Donald Lambro
Posted on 09/08/2002 9:45:56 AM PDT by xsysmgr
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:56:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee is much more optimistic that the Republican Party will regain control of the Senate this year -- so much so that he now says he can afford to "take risks" in some longshot races.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: randita
they're still paying for not throwing Clinton overboard. You got that right!
21
posted on
09/08/2002 11:09:18 AM PDT
by
shiva
To: Miss Marple; PhiKapMom; Howlin; Coop; GraniteStateConservative
FYI..........
VOTE REPUBLICAN NOV. 5, 2002
Take back the Senate
Retain the House
22
posted on
09/08/2002 11:13:09 AM PDT
by
deport
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
If the Republicans gain back the Senate, will "jumpin" Jim Jeffords try to return to the fold?I think it;s going to be worse than that. I think we are going to see a couple of RINO's jump to the Dem side. McCain for one, then one or two more to give the Senate back to the Dark Side.
So much for the Big Tent theory.
To: xsysmgr
If the pubbies retake the Senate and retain the House,
AND...
Jean Carnahan is defeated,
I will be the happiest Pubbie there ever was.
To: alloysteel
It has been said very often since the attacks last year that the nation and the world have changed. I have remained highly skeptical that anything much has changed, let alone anything fundamental. I continue to believe these elections will go a long way toward confirming or denying whether or not anything fundamental has changed in this country.
For example, are we still a nation that is willing to tolerate a corrupt politician like Torricelli? Are we a nation that truly recognizes the threat we face, and comprehends that the President needs a strengthened hand to deal with the threat? Are we going to prove that Osama bin Laden's opinion of us was right or wrong? I'm referring to his opinion of us as weak and all-consumed by materialism. Another example to draw the point finer: Do we want a Senate that will give us a prescription drug "benefit" while failing for months to pass the Defense appropriation? What will we choose?
25
posted on
09/08/2002 11:34:52 AM PDT
by
Wolfstar
To: WhiteGuy
Predictions?
The GOP will get stupid.
Among other things, they'll submit, and vote for, a permanent extension to the assault weapons ban, guaranteeing that the Dems will sweep both branches in 2004.
26
posted on
09/08/2002 11:41:27 AM PDT
by
jdege
To: xsysmgr
Let's hope and pray this will be true! We also need to be active and send money to the campaigns of Pubbie candidates wherever they are! The thought of more time with the RAT majority in the Senate is a cause of great anguish. Keep in mind what Dashole and the miserable RAT Senators have done to screw up the nation since that arch-turncoat Jeffords deserted.
To: jdege
Do you really believe that?
Seriously,
can you think of anything at all that the gop will accomplish in the next 2 years?
28
posted on
09/08/2002 11:45:24 AM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
To: eureka!
I hope he doesn't and I hope the Rep succeed... Why? Do you see the Dems in the minority even caring about giving Jeffords a committee assignment at all?
29
posted on
09/08/2002 11:45:46 AM PDT
by
marajade
To: Balding_Eagle
McCain ain't gonna change sides...
30
posted on
09/08/2002 11:47:54 AM PDT
by
marajade
To: Balding_Eagle
I think it;s going to be worse than that. I think we are going to see a couple of RINO's jump to the Dem side. McCain for one, then one or two more to give the Senate back to the Dark Side.I think it will take more than a couple.
I have a gut feeling that a 55-45 Republican majority is possible.
To: TonyRo76
One out of three ain't bad.
32
posted on
09/08/2002 12:05:37 PM PDT
by
alnick
To: TonyRo76
IRS abolished; either a flat tax or national sales tax passed.
You dream, sir.
33
posted on
09/08/2002 12:07:48 PM PDT
by
Polonius
To: TonyRo76
Not yet. The Repub leadership isn't going to anything dramatic that will shake things up during war years. Too much risk to the economy to make these kinds of changes at this point.
To: xsysmgr
How the heck did WELLSTONE ever take the lead again??? The most liberal person in the Senate, who broke a pledge not to run again and faces a popular opponent backed heavily by Bush? What the heck is going on there in Minnesota?
Besides the fact that the Bears are going to come back and kick your BUTT today....
35
posted on
09/08/2002 12:14:20 PM PDT
by
PianoMan
To: WhiteGuy
I fear it.
36
posted on
09/08/2002 12:20:57 PM PDT
by
jdege
To: StolarStorm
Huh? The way the FBI is now doing things is a dramatic change... The Homeland Security Dept that Bush wants to create is a huge change... Our focus on prevention, rather than after it happens is huge...
37
posted on
09/08/2002 12:21:27 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: marajade
Getting rid of the IRS and setting up a sales tax or flat tax would have huge economic effects. Good effects in the long term, but it would be bloody in the short term as companies and individuals shift strategies to cope with the change. The FBI and Homeland changes are very small compared to the economic chnages that would result from implementing a national sales tax or flat tax.
If it were up to me, I'd phase things in slowly, eliminating a tax bracket every year and reducing deductions...once a flat tax is in place slowly start to bring in a sales tax with corresponding reductions in income tax bracket rates. Overnight changes would be devastating.
To: WhiteGuy
OK, so lets say it is a given that the gop will regain control of the senate. They will maintain their control of the house.
And, they control the presidency.
What will be accomplished in the next 2 years? Any predictions?
Easy - Sir FagALott will reopen power-sharing negotiations.
The last thing to look for would be a smaller, less-expensive and less-intrusive Stupid Federal Government.
To: marajade
Re#29. Nope. Use and lose. Just like the Clintons...
40
posted on
09/08/2002 12:39:45 PM PDT
by
eureka!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson