Posted on 09/07/2002 7:53:16 AM PDT by Commie Basher
A lot of people seem to believe that these families hit the "lottery" and they feel a bit envious. Every damn dollar these families received from the money donated to them was offset dollar for dollar by the insurance coverage the victims were entitled to. Yes the outpouring of donations was extreme and not sustainable for future terrorist acts but to blame the families is so out of bounds as to be criminal. The nation and the outpouring of support was as much a result of shock as anything else but it allowed many a sense of doing something to retain some semblance of control.
I'm not sure if 9/11 can be called an act of war, because wars are fought between nations. No nation attacked us, not even Adghanistan. "Islamo-fascism" and "terror" are not nations, but nebulous terms.
We were at war against Afghanistan, and may be at war against Iraq, but a "war on terror" is a metaphor, like "war on poverty" and "war on drugs."
The phrase "war on..." is one of those phrases beloved by politicos to show they're on top of the ball, and "doing something." It's like whenever they respond to a problem by appointing a Tsar, or Blue Ribbon Panel, or Lockbox, or some other meaningless phrase for nothing specific in particular.
You can say it until you turn purple, but you would still be wrong.
Interesting bit of info you share, skypilot. We bought low and in this current market have equity of over 200k...we pay extra each month to bring our loan even lower. Rent would be double what we normally pay in house payment...so that wouldn't be an option for us. However, we do know others who have done just what you suggested. For them it was a very wise decision. :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.