Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts: Iraq has tons of chemical weapons(CNN)
CNN ^ | 9/2/02

Posted on 09/02/2002 4:59:17 PM PDT by finnman69

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:08 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (CNN) --Nearly four years after U.N. inspectors left Iraq, weapons experts say there is mounting evidence that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has amassed large stocks of chemical and biological weapons he is hiding from a possible U.S. military attack.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: doug from upland
But wait. Shouldn't we be listening to the renowned world expert William Rivers Pitt?

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! You mean the self appointed king of the putzes?

41 posted on 09/02/2002 7:15:48 PM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
That makes sense, or it could also simply be positioning to get some sort of payoff from the US for their support.
42 posted on 09/02/2002 7:18:47 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
"Also, the treasonous policy of Klinton to "launch after impact" needs to be reversed immediately, if it has not already been done."

I tried to ignore everything that idiot did, so enlighten me: U.S. nuclear war-fighting policy went from "launch-on-warning" of a incoming attack, to "launch-only-after-impact" of whatever stuff was inbound?

Another reason to try that bustard for treason...



43 posted on 09/02/2002 7:52:16 PM PDT by PLMerite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
U.S. nuclear war-fighting policy went from "launch-on-warning" of a incoming attack, to "launch-only-after-impact" of whatever stuff was inbound?

That's pretty much the way I understand it. The point being that "launch after impact" would probably not occur since the enemy nation would then launch round #2 if we responded.

I had forgotten all about it until I heard Alex Jones talking about it last week, but there is probably some more info on it in the archives here.

44 posted on 09/02/2002 8:05:00 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
There used to be a guy who posted here during the last year of the Clinton Administration, who would do a daily "moment" of stuff like this launch policy revision.

He did about 200 of them and then disappeared. I thought it was amazing that he could go, day after day, with some idiotic policy or criminal behavior. He didn't even get to all of the stuff. It really is amazing how busy Clinton was at destroying the country, from forest policy to military policy to diplomatic snafus. And the troubles are still piling up from his 8 years.

45 posted on 09/02/2002 8:05:28 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is NOT a promoter of the miitary-industrial complex. If anything, it leans liberal.

Here is their web site: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

I would say that an analyst for this organization would be far more interested in trying to hide chemical weapons production by Iraq if there were the slightest doubt.

Therefore, your little slam on this gentleman is misguided.

At some point we will be given the evidence (and I wouldn't be surprised if part of it comes when the President addresses the UN). I certainly hope that at that point you are finally convinced.

There is a real danger. I told you before that you are handicapped by not being here and if you were, you would have no doubt that this is a necessay action our nation will take.

46 posted on 09/02/2002 8:13:41 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
...I told you before that you are handicapped by not being here and if you were, you would have no doubt that this is a necessary action our nation will take...

Genuinely trying to compensate for that factor, Miss M. We don't have a TV, and I'm the only person I know who hasn't seen the planes hit the WTC. So the searing emotion of that footage hasn't burnt into my consciousness the way it has for many here. But I still think declaring war is something you do in the cold hard light of day, and only on rock-solid grounds. Regards, By.

47 posted on 09/03/2002 4:37:46 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson