To: Mulder
"Also, the treasonous policy of Klinton to "launch after impact" needs to be reversed immediately, if it has not already been done."
I tried to ignore everything that idiot did, so enlighten me: U.S. nuclear war-fighting policy went from "launch-on-warning" of a incoming attack, to "launch-only-after-impact" of whatever stuff was inbound?
Another reason to try that bustard for treason...
43 posted on
09/02/2002 7:52:16 PM PDT by
PLMerite
To: PLMerite
U.S. nuclear war-fighting policy went from "launch-on-warning" of a incoming attack, to "launch-only-after-impact" of whatever stuff was inbound? That's pretty much the way I understand it. The point being that "launch after impact" would probably not occur since the enemy nation would then launch round #2 if we responded.
I had forgotten all about it until I heard Alex Jones talking about it last week, but there is probably some more info on it in the archives here.
44 posted on
09/02/2002 8:05:00 PM PDT by
Mulder
To: PLMerite
There used to be a guy who posted here during the last year of the Clinton Administration, who would do a daily "moment" of stuff like this launch policy revision.
He did about 200 of them and then disappeared. I thought it was amazing that he could go, day after day, with some idiotic policy or criminal behavior. He didn't even get to all of the stuff. It really is amazing how busy Clinton was at destroying the country, from forest policy to military policy to diplomatic snafus. And the troubles are still piling up from his 8 years.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson