Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air marshal points gun at passengers
AP via Nando Times ^ | 8/31/02 | MARYCLAIRE DALE

Posted on 09/01/2002 7:48:18 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
I can't believe this hasn't been posted yet, but the search engine turned up bupkis. This air marshal sounds like a graduate of the Al Gore School of Gun Safety.

FReegards,
Slings and Arrows

1 posted on 09/01/2002 7:48:18 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
It Has:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/742801/posts

2 posted on 09/01/2002 7:52:48 AM PDT by scab4faa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
How unruly is a passenger that isn't charged with anything? These days if I am going anywhere under about 700 miles (Minneapolis to Detroit or Minneapolis to St. Louis) I drive. I 'spect most people make a judgement as to threshhold for themselves. Likely within about 12 months, the taxpayers that no longer can stand flying will be asked to subsidize the airlines...all so we can "fairly" treat ALL passenegers as dirt.

As that Israeli security guy that shot that terrorist in LA a month or so ago said: (paraphrase) The US doesn't know anything about airline security. All they know how to do is annoy people.

3 posted on 09/01/2002 7:56:08 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Transportation Security Administration spokesman David Steigman said air marshals "dealt with a passenger who was acting in an odd and obstreperous manner."
 

obstreperous \ub-STREP-ur-us; ob-\, adjective:
1. Noisily and stubbornly defiant; unruly.
2. Noisy, clamorous, or boisterous.

 

Kind of seems like exactly what the passenger was doing would be pertinant to the story, unless this is just another "Guns are bad... kay?" hack job.

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

4 posted on 09/01/2002 8:00:05 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
I figured it was a disease.
5 posted on 09/01/2002 8:14:06 AM PDT by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Oh my god! The guy was talking to a female passenger next to him? the nerve of that guy! I hope they fry his ass for that!

And people STILL ask me why I'm refusing to fly until the feds get their crap together...

6 posted on 09/01/2002 8:59:11 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
err... behind him, I mean... oops...
7 posted on 09/01/2002 9:02:42 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
It's a good that the "Gun" didn't do anything - all by itself!

There are rumors that "Guns" and "SUV'S" are secretly meeting and that drive by shootings are going to be worse than ever!!!!!
8 posted on 09/01/2002 9:14:21 AM PDT by stlrocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
A federal air marshal pointed a gun towards passengers


I see a new federal TSA reg coming. "At all times, the air marshal shall point his/her weapon out the window or at own head"
9 posted on 09/01/2002 9:17:17 AM PDT by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stlrocket
There are rumors that "Guns" and "SUV'S" are secretly meeting and that drive by shootings are going to be worse than ever!!!!!

LOL!

10 posted on 09/01/2002 9:26:51 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
I don't see what all of the Huff is about here....

One marshal to control the subject.

And the other marshal to (watch his back)They don't know who else could be on that plane. Could have been a diversion for all they know....

They did the right thing IMHO...
11 posted on 09/01/2002 9:27:18 AM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Pointing a firearm at passengers under those circumstances is irresponsible. If he was that concerned, he could have kept it drawn and pointed up, bringing it to bear in less than a second if someone tried to run forward. What kind of training are these people getting?
12 posted on 09/01/2002 9:31:19 AM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stlrocket; feinswinesuksass; lowbridge; HangFire
It's a good that the "Gun" didn't do anything - all by itself!

There are rumors that "Guns" and "SUV'S" are secretly meeting and that drive by shootings are going to be worse than ever!!!!!
 
LOL!!!

13 posted on 09/01/2002 9:34:10 AM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
What kind of training are these people getting?

And you've been trained to handle this?

14 posted on 09/01/2002 9:37:51 AM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Pointing a firearm at passengers under those circumstances is irresponsible.

Agree. If this incident occurred as described, the air marshal needlessly made a tense situation even more tense for everyone staring down the barrel of his weapon. He could just as easily held the weapon pointing straight up and brought it to bear if necessary in an instant.

This is real life, not "Starsky and Hutch."

15 posted on 09/01/2002 9:38:49 AM PDT by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: strela
Sheesh .. ... he could have ...

And that's after one cup of coffee too.

16 posted on 09/01/2002 9:40:16 AM PDT by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stevem
"These days if I am going anywhere under about 700 miles (Minneapolis to Detroit or Minneapolis to St. Louis) I drive."

That's now the "break-even distance" at which flying is faster - if nothing unusual happens.

The amazing thing is that Americans still pay hundreds of dollars to be treated worse than inmates!

17 posted on 09/01/2002 9:40:38 AM PDT by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
I don't know - and this article does not adequately describe - what caused the air marshals to react. But by doing so, they blew their cover (assuming they had not already been identified by their haircuts and "dress code" uniforms described in an earlier article) and revealed their weapons. Those actions make them a target for any other potential hijacker on board.

In that circumstance, guarding their backs, with weapons drawn, is reasonable and proper, although menacing other passengers by pointing a gun at them is not. This is a safety and training issue that ought to be addressed, if it occurred as described.
18 posted on 09/01/2002 9:47:26 AM PDT by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
...I disagree. The marshal would have to be pointing the gun at himself. Example, the picture of Gore looking down the barrel of an M16...

...Wish I had saved that...

19 posted on 09/01/2002 9:53:08 AM PDT by gargoyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson