Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh to White House: What About Salman Pak?
Newsmax.com ^ | 8 30 2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 08/31/2002 3:07:33 AM PDT by ovrtaxt

Friday Aug. 30, 2002; 11:16 p.m. EDT Limbaugh to White House: What About Salman Pak?

Is the Bush administration using all the ammunition at its disposal to convince the American people that war with Iraq is imperative?

Not according to conservative media giant Rush Limbaugh, who chastised the White House Thursday for not spotlighting the issue of Salman Pak, the hijacking school run by Saddam Hussein just south of Baghdad where the 9-11 hijackers likely trained to attack America.

"It's unbelievable that somehow this story remains sequestered," Limbaugh told his 20 million listeners. "I read this story last night and I was amazed."

"There is something called the Republican National Committee and there is the administration," the number one talk host complained. "And look, if I could find this on the Internet, I'm sure the web surfers in the basement of the White House or the Old Executive Office Building could find it too."

Limbaugh proceeded to read at length from a Nov. 11 report in London's Observer newspaper - one of the most respected broadsheets in Great Britain - detailing the accounts of two Salman Pak defectors along with corroborating testimony from a former UN weapons inspector.

Though the Observer's bombshell report has been largely ignored by both the press and the White House in recent months, the similarity between what transpired over the skies of New York and Washington, D.C. on Sept. 11 and the drills at Saddam Hussein's hijacking school offers clear evidence of Iraq's involvement in Osama bin Laden's attacks on America.

The facts uncovered by the Observer have yet to be refuted by any subsequent media investigation. And should they be invoked by the Bush White House, the story could form the basis for a solid argument that attacking Iraq isn't merely a preemptive strike to keep Saddam from getting the bomb, but instead direct retribution against the lone head of state who both financed and helped plan the worst attack on the United States in its history.

NewsMax.com first reviewed the Salman Pak story nearly three weeks ago in a report headlined: "Salman Pak: Iraq's Smoking Gun Link to 9-11."

Some excerpts:

With all the talk about how little evidence the Bush administration has tying Saddam Hussein to the 9-11 attacks, we're more than a little surprised at how quickly reporters, not to mention the White House, seem to have forgotten about Salman Pak.

That's the name of the Iraqi training camp located south of Baghdad where, according to the accounts of at least two Iraqi defectors quoted in the New York Times last November, terrorists from around the world rehearsed airline hijackings aboard a parked Boeing 707 that bore an eerie resemblance to what transpired on 9-11.

"We could see them train around the fuselage," one of the defectors, a five-year veteran of the camp, told the paper. "We could see them practice taking over the plane."

And that's not all.

A few days before the Times report, the London Observer revealed that one of the defectors, a colonel with the Iraqi intelligence service Mukhabarat, had drawn an even more direct link to 9-11.

The former Iraqi agent, codenamed Zeinab, told the paper that one of the highlights of Salman Pak's six-month curriculum was training to hijack aircraft using only knives or bare hands. Like the Sept. 11 hijackers, the students worked in groups of four or five, he explained.

Zeinab's story has since been corroborated by Charles Duelfer, the former vice chairman of Unscom, the U.N. weapons inspection team, who actually visited the Salman Pak camp several times.

"He saw the 707, in exactly the place described by the defectors," the Observer reported. "The Iraqis, he said, told Unscom it was used by police for counterterrorist training."

"Of course we automatically took out the word 'counter'," Duelfer explained. "I'm surprised that people seem to be shocked that there should be terror camps in Iraq. Like, derrrrrr! I mean, what, actually, do you expect?"

Unlike the other parts of Salman Pak, Zeinab told the Observer that there was a foreigners' camp that was controlled directly by Saddam Hussein.

"It was a nightmare! A very strange experience," the Iraqi agent said. "These guys would stop and insist on praying to Allah five times a day when we had training to do. The instructors wouldn't get home till late at night, just because of all this praying."

A second defector said that conversations with the hijacker-trainees made it clear they came from a variety of countries, including Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Algeria, Egypt and Morocco.

"We were training these people to attack installations important to the United States," he added chillingly. "The Gulf War never ended for Saddam Hussein. He is at war with the United States. We were repeatedly told this."

Though the Bush administration has been largely silent about Salman Pak, former CIA Director James Woolsey is apparently convinced it was used to rehearse Sept. 11-style hijackings.

In late November he told Fox News Channel's Laurie Dhue:

"We know that at Salman Pak, on the southern edge of Baghdad, five different eyewitnesses - three Iraqi defectors and two American U.N. inspectors - have said - and now there are aerial photographs to show it - a Boeing 707 that was used for training of hijackers, including non-Iraqi hijackers trained very secretly to take over airplanes with knives."

Another intriguing coincidence: Salman Pak's hijacking school reportedly opened for business in 1995, the same year al-Qaeda agents in the Philippines hatched a plot to hijack 12 airliners and slam some of them into U.S. landmarks. (End of NewsMax excerpt)

Despite the compelling case of Salman Pak, the shockingly flat-footed Bush public relations team remains mum on the most potent justification for hitting back at Baghdad.

No wonder support for Bush's Iraq attack has dropped to just 51 percent in the latest Gallup poll.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; iraq; rush; salmanpak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
I wonder about the White House sometimes. This is basic. Im sure they know about this, and the links to OK city, and WTC 93, and several other incidents. But they just sit there and try to look compassionate and bend over in front of Tom Daschle. Let's see some blood!
1 posted on 08/31/2002 3:07:33 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Was the November 11th Observer article posted at FR?
2 posted on 08/31/2002 3:14:13 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
I don't know, but here's the NewsMax story:

http://www.FreeRepublic.com/focus/news/732520/posts
3 posted on 08/31/2002 3:20:13 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Yeah, Newsmax ran it about 2 weeks ago and a few Freepers posted it back then. Bears repeating, though.

Can we search back that far? I doubt it since JimRob wasn't sure either.
4 posted on 08/31/2002 3:26:31 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I read the Original article posted by Limbacher himself. Only 15 replies? Amazing. Apparently nobody 'out here' knows about this. I didn't until I heard it on Rush.
5 posted on 08/31/2002 3:32:15 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks Jim.

I remember watching a segment about Sadam Hussein on CNN, I think it was in the early weeks of Desert Shield.

In one clip from Iraqi TV, he had just finished an address to the Iraqi parliament. As he sat down, one of his aides went to the podium and started reading off names.

When the person's name was read, plainclothesmen escorted the member out of the room. I'd say he read about 15 or 20 names. He then sat down.

The members of Parliament who remained then burst out into absolutely thunderous applause.

They had been spared.

6 posted on 08/31/2002 3:47:01 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Time to take the gloves off and Rush did months ago, problem is Rush has been pushed to the side by freepers attacking him, Talk about eating your own. Gee that is real smart! Yep!!!!
7 posted on 08/31/2002 4:31:44 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/742345/posts

Check out this article by JohnHuang2. Very insightful, and encouraging.
8 posted on 08/31/2002 4:54:09 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/587611/posts
9 posted on 08/31/2002 5:10:06 AM PDT by tunnel rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
The RNC, run by 'what's-his-name' (I don't see or hear the guy enough to know his name by heart yet!) and the non-leader of the republican senate Trent Lott are pitifull and useless!

I have returned two request for donations with nasty letters stating no more funding still somebody grows a pair and starts supporting the President!

10 posted on 08/31/2002 5:18:41 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
thanks.....
11 posted on 08/31/2002 5:30:00 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
This is a very important post....and one that deserves not only the Whitehouse's but our attention

But I still wish someone would quantify where the 20 million listener thing comes from. When asked directly, Premiere who puts out Rush's show.....gets very vague as to how that number is derived and often says that they believe at "one time" that may have been a total weekly cumulative number. C'mon folks, we need facts.

but the most important thing is we need to know more about this school.

12 posted on 08/31/2002 5:31:46 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
My opinion is... We are reaping the fruits of the Clinton years. The economy, terrorists, degrading public morals, and the list goes on. Rush Limbaugh used to say that Clinton would not be able the do too much damage and after he is out of office we'll need to clean up after him. Well, he was right about one thing... we are having to clean up... but as to the damage done, it ain't over yet.

This White House has had to rebuild the military. And I believe they knew from the beginning that they would have to go after Sadam. But there was no way they could go after both OSB and Sadam simultaneously, so they took the rout of least drag on the military to take care of one part of the equation while scurrying to build up resources, including intelligence, to go after the other. All the while playing this game of "not everybody being on the same page" to stall for time.

Ya, Clinton didn't destroy America in 8 short years, but the damage done is not yet complete. It may take several more years for all his undoing to surface.
13 posted on 08/31/2002 6:19:12 AM PDT by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
PBS Frontline's "Gunning for Saddam" did a good job on the Salman Pak. It has been shown as a rerun also.

Web Page of the show

14 posted on 08/31/2002 6:36:22 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
joe, regarding listenership, here's what I've heard... Rush was discussing the mechanics of running a radio show with another talk show host.

He mentioned "...at about this time ( 2:00 ) we have about 3,000,000 listeners..."

So I would guess that 20 million is some sort of cumulative total, perhaps for the week.

15 posted on 08/31/2002 6:36:36 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
How about the fact he tried to assassinate a former president of the USA
16 posted on 08/31/2002 6:50:20 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Good post. I did not see the justification for a new attack, but this strong evidence has caused me to reconsider...
17 posted on 08/31/2002 7:16:01 AM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
more

Don't know about this site, just dug this up on a search.

18 posted on 08/31/2002 7:40:22 AM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honway; glorygirl; lawdog; Wm Bach; Uncle Bill; nunya bidness; ntrulock; backhoe; archy; Askel5; ...
BUMP
19 posted on 08/31/2002 7:46:32 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
I know the first victim in war is truth, but the fact is the facility in Salman Park is used for Counter-Terrorism training by the Iraqi secret police.

Saddam HATES radical islam, the idea that Saddam would invite islamic terrorists to Iraq for training is about as laughable as Ariel Sharon inviting Yassir Arafat over for Sunday dinner.

The only Islamic terrorists who have been to Salman Park were their for their execution.

The America people as a whole are stupid, they will believe ANYTHING the government tells them, but the rest of the world isn't buying the Iraq terroism story.

20 posted on 08/31/2002 8:04:11 AM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson