Skip to comments.
Gore says Saddam "must be removed from power" (June 2000)
Associated Press ^
| June 26, 2000
| Sandra Sobieraj
Posted on 08/29/2002 8:39:36 PM PDT by zapiks44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Hmmmm... where was all the media hysteria when Gore was saying Saddam should be ousted?
1
posted on
08/29/2002 8:39:36 PM PDT
by
zapiks44
To: zapiks44
Great find.
Only one question: who is Gore?
2
posted on
08/29/2002 8:41:30 PM PDT
by
dighton
To: zapiks44
Of course when Saddam is removed, Al Gore will say, "See, I also supported removing Saddam."
3
posted on
08/29/2002 8:44:35 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: dighton
AL Gore - Supossed creator of the Internet (HA) and the biggest idiot to come out of Tenneessee.
4
posted on
08/29/2002 8:46:48 PM PDT
by
scab4faa
To: zapiks44
The Democratic presidential candidate was showcasing his foreign policy responsibilities as vice president Monday ...Dear Al,
5
posted on
08/29/2002 8:47:14 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: zapiks44
Gore, you and Slick had your chance, and you sat on your hands, while Dr. SadMan went back to his lab to see how his manical creations were progressing. Talk is cheap, and 3 dollar Bill, and his side kick AlGore, were the cheapest talkers I've ever seen. But boy could they talk.
To: scab4faa; phasma proeliator
I consider it extremely ironic, considering Gore and an old college body named Frankenstein invented Saddam....
To: zapiks44
Better late than never.
8
posted on
08/29/2002 8:52:23 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
To: zapiks44
He must have read a Poll, and now is trying to change his stripes as usual.
Well, we're ON to him, and he stinks...just like the SKUNK he is.
To: zapiks44
IMHO, this only makes the administration look even more foolish for wanting to "go it alone".
It wouldn't bother me at all to see Saddam Hussein get vaporized by a nuke.
But I haven't seen any evidence that would warrant such an attack.
If they merely want to oust a tyranous dicatator, we should practice on Fidel Castro and liberate Cuba. It's closer to home and should be easier to accomplish on our own.
To: Russell Scott
"Gore, you and Slick had your chance, and you sat on your hands, while Dr. SadMan went back to his lab to see how his manical...."
I believe you have them mixed up with GW's Daddy - and believe me it is the same DNA - unfortunately.
11
posted on
08/29/2002 9:03:24 PM PDT
by
SEGUET
To: Willie Green
IMHO, this only makes the administration look even more foolish for wanting to "go it alone". Hey if numbnuts wants to go it alone fine then. Strap a nuke to his @ss and send him over, win/win situation.
A senior State Department official said after the half-hour meeting that, because it was not a campaign event, Gore did not speak ``in terms of a Gore presidency.''
Gore Presidency??? That would be a sad, sad day for America.
The administration launched punishing air raids on Baghdad in December 1998 but failed to force Saddam to cooperate with United Nations weapons inspectors, who have yet to return to Iraq.
But it did help cover up that Cuban incident of Bubba Clinton's (Down Monica!)
12
posted on
08/29/2002 9:23:09 PM PDT
by
scab4faa
To: Willie Green
Gore was simply following the strategy that was used by his boss in Kosovo. Create a legacy for yourself by holding up some third-rate dictator as an evil villain and proposing to oust him.
Never mind that this dictator has a military force that wouldn't even stand up to the Ohio National Guard, let alone the U.S. military. Just get rid of him.
To: All
Now we KNOW for certain that Gore is running for Prez again. Everyone knows that President Gore would be sniffing the European Union's you-know-what at this point. Heck, we might actually be a member of the EU itself if Big Al was presently in the Oval. But Gore, ole buddy, ole pal, the next time you go up against Bush, he will be an incumbent in wartime, so the equation has changed. He won't listen. Like Elvis, every time he passes a mirror, he has to stop and admire what he sees. Good for us that the American people will not give him anywhere near the vote he got in 2000. Were it not for last minute election surprises, (remember the 11th hour DUI charge, and that from over 25 years ago, and even that only for driving too slow?). No Al, get used to retirement. Squeeze on Tipper a couple of times for me, would 'ya buddy???
14
posted on
08/29/2002 10:04:45 PM PDT
by
Malcolm
To: zapiks44
Hmmmm... where was all the media hysteria when Gore was saying Saddam should be ousted?Back during Desert Storm, let us never forget that Al Gore bartered for television face time. He would support the war if he got a lot of face time. He would oppose the war otherwise. He used THAT to decide which way he would vote. Our troops were nothing but pawns for his political ambitions. The higher purpose of national sovereignty and world stability meant nothing to him. It was all him. Scary to think he was so close to being elected president.
Freegards....
To: SEGUET
I believe you have them mixed up with GW's Daddy - and believe me it is the same DNA - unfortunately.Did you get lost on your way to DU again, dear? You really should bookmark it ya know...
To: Russell Scott
Gore, you and Slick had your chance, and you sat on your hands, while Dr. SadMan went back to his lab to see how his manical creations were progressing. Talk is cheap, and 3 dollar Bill, and his side kick AlGore, were the cheapest talkers I've ever seen. But boy could they talk.I'll call it a perfect summary.
To: He Rides A White Horse
What's interesting here is that Gore is speaking for the administration...no squawk..
Cheney gave a dissertation on Saddam the other day...The Press "Anal ysts" went nuts as to whether he was speaking for the President...It's kinda like a duh in this administration as this President is daily At his desk talking with his staff, not under his desk...
The press sure has its agenda layed out!!
Thank God for Fox!!
Sac
To: zapiks44
The Democratic presidential candidate Which one?
Alpha male?
Formal (empty) suit and tie?
Business casual?
Clean-shaven?
Goatee-adorned?
With airbrushed "enhancements"?
pfehhhh......
19
posted on
08/31/2002 2:37:04 PM PDT
by
NorCoGOP
To: Willie Green
If they merely want to oust a tyranous dicatator, we should practice on Fidel Castro and liberate Cuba. It's closer to home and should be easier to accomplish on our own.If sugar and tobacco got better mileage than gasoline, Castro would have been toast in 1961.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson