Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS? (a question for Freepers)
August 22nd, 2002 | Sabertooth

Posted on 08/22/2002 7:04:53 AM PDT by Sabertooth

This is a vanity post, let's get that straight from the start.

Perhaps the most vain aspect of it is the conceit that it might stay on topic, but I'm going to give it a whirl.

One of the more contentious species of threads encountered on Free Republic are those dealing with the subject of America's immigration policy, particularly with regard to the Illegal Aliens currently in our country. According a range of reasonable sources, the estimates of their numbers here currently here range from six to thirteen million. Whatever the actual count, there are quite a few people now in violation of American immigration law.

One subtopic that inevitably arises is the question of Amnesty:

Should all or some portion of the Illegal Aliens be granted an Amnesty and be thereby allowed to change their status and acquire legal residence in the United States?

That's the question I'd like to put forward to the members of Free Republic.

Almost as inevitably on threads dealing with this subject, flame wars erupt. It's not my purpose to instigate another round of that, they're rather predictable. So I'd like to ask that your comments, if you're inclined to share them, focus on the big picture of American immigration policy, with particular attention to the subject of Amnesty. I'm not interested in the stock and gratuitous divisiveness of race-baiting or referring to the President as "Jorge," or anything of that nature from any quarter. It achieves nothing, it's sulphurous methane heat with no light shed.

I'd also like to avoid ad hominem ambushes. I'm genuinely interested in learning the collective feelings of Free Republic members on this subject. If you're gonna post, I'd like to ask that you ante up with your opinion on the question at hand before engaging the discussion with others. No taking potshots from the obscurity of the sidelines. I'll post my opinion below at #1.

Fair enough?

So, once again, here's the question:

Should all or some portion of the Illegal Aliens be granted an Amnesty and be thereby allowed to change their status and acquire legal residence in the United States?



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 921-932 next last
To: 4Freedom
I'm saying that everyone that I know in the UAW is not for any kind of amnesty. Let's say 100% of union households would be less likely to vote for pro amnesty types.
561 posted on 08/23/2002 7:05:53 PM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
"Should all or some portion of the Illegal Aliens be granted an Amnesty and be thereby allowed to change their status and acquire legal residence in the United States?"

no. not even the one's who have been here for years.
562 posted on 08/23/2002 7:08:56 PM PDT by sonofron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
ILLEGAL ALIENS
563 posted on 08/23/2002 7:09:28 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
You believe it was 100% before as well as after 9/11?
564 posted on 08/23/2002 7:13:04 PM PDT by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
Please don't misunderstand, I'm not critisizing your comments. You sound very logical and I agree with much of your assesment. It's Zogby that I have lost that lovin' feelin' for.
565 posted on 08/23/2002 7:13:10 PM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
That is great! Did you write it?

no... i wish i had...

566 posted on 08/23/2002 7:19:44 PM PDT by glock rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

Comment #567 Removed by Moderator

To: hchutch
I don't think enough people are going to switch their votes over this issue for you to do anything except complain.

Your smugness that few voters will make immigration a hot button issue is right in line with the GOP's arrogance on this. We will see HC. That Bush took pains to hide his open borders agenda on the campaign trail should tell you something. In my opinion, as the immigration crisis worsens in America, Bush and the GOP will pay an ever-higher price for their support of policies that encourage more illegal immigration, not to mention their negligence in even bothering with simple constitutional matters like defending our borders and preserving our sovereignty.

Like I said before, the conservative backlash against Bush you see on FR for his pro-Amnesty stand is only a microcosm of what is going on with his nationwide support. Listen to the Sunday C-Span talk shows sometime to get a feel on how other republicans feel about this issue. The anger throughout the country on illegal immigration IS REAL.

If Bush signs the 245(i) Amnesty Bill he immediately jeopardizes his chances on re-election. I'd think that the closeness of 2000 election would have driven home the point that neither Bush or the GOP can ill afford to lose much of their support from their conservative constituents. But go ahead and play with fire. Only in defeat will you and others in the GOP get the message.

568 posted on 08/23/2002 7:23:05 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
Absolutly 100% before and after and if you know any union folk, just ask them what is happening to american jobs.

The union line is, what jobs are not sold overseas, are being taken by illegals. I personally don't believe that, a vast majority of unionites do.

My sources are this: my brother is UAW in Bay City, Mi, my sister is pres of her local in Flint, Mi, I am a member ofUAW 113 in Muskegon, Mi.

I believe most members in Mi are of this mindset.

569 posted on 08/23/2002 7:25:28 PM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
Again, I don't see anyone who challenged Sensenbrenner, DeLay, or Hyde over their votes in favor of an amnesty.

Nor am I aware that any of them are in danger of losing their re-election bids.

I've been asking if you can claim otherwise. Do not hide behind Zogby polls or by trying to drag out the fact that I merely reported my brother's observations (which you have grossly distorted to imply that he was harboring them - which was NEVER the case - then again, they are compeltely at odds with your agenda, so I am not surprised that you would be trying to hide from that inconvenient fact).

I also looked at other opinion polls. Illegal immigration, an amensty, or even immgiration in general has not even shown up on the polls concerning priorities. This issue is not even a BLIP on the minds of the general public (Source:
http://www.pollingreport.com/prioriti.htm).

In other words, the poll numbers you are posting don't mean squat. None of the people polled (which is what you seem to think is important) feel this issue is a priority.

To put it bluntly, I'm calling your bluff on this issue. Put up or shut up.
570 posted on 08/23/2002 7:26:56 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
Yeah and we know how much the unions support the GOP.
571 posted on 08/23/2002 7:29:15 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
None of the polls have shown any of this (http://www.pollingreport.com/prioriti.htm).

Bush has a mid-90s approval rating among Republicans (according to Gallup) AFTER he's supported an amnesty. He's drawing as much as 54% of the Hispanic vote. So some Buchanabots bolt. We won without `em in 2000, we'll probably more than make it up in 2004, if it comes to that.

You've not taken any of us out on the amnesty issue yet - much less over immgiration in general. Sound and fury, signifying nothing.
572 posted on 08/23/2002 7:30:45 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Sabertooth
" does this mean that YOU are going to stop engaging in your usual level of vindictiveness from now on ? "

Don't you think that is a bit of a stretch? Show me one thing that sabertooth has said that is even remotely vindictive. He asked at the beginning that we all try to be civil and non-inflammatory and I think we have done that remarkably well. The only posts I have seen that have been out of line with that request are yours and VA Alvogado. I thought your remarks were uncalled for.

573 posted on 08/23/2002 7:43:25 PM PDT by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
"Aren't you looking for a grey cloud with a little more energy than necessary?"

LOL! I thought it followed him everywhere he went.

574 posted on 08/23/2002 7:48:01 PM PDT by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Drill Alaska
"We have a wonderful opportunity to go with the flow of this wave of new Americans from the south," he said. "Quite often they become better Americans than the ones who came before them." [This remark was made at the annual dinner of El Centro Hispano, of all places.]

Nice to know where American Citizens stand visa-vi Illegal Aliens with this administration. Quite an admission by the Bush Administration that they have NO INTENTIONS of doing anything but encouraging more illegal immigration. I guess they view the Citizen Taxpayer who collectively pays billions of dollars of their hard-earned money every year to cover the welfare expenses of illegal aliens as SAPS that need no representation.

Listening to this administration I get the feeling that they are ready to challenge Vicente Fox for the Presidency of Mexico.

575 posted on 08/23/2002 7:51:10 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
"Folks are being civil... what's wrong with that?"

I am discovering that some people on FR just can't bear to see a civil discussion taking place without them so they have the need to try and change the tone. The same thing happens on the southern threads. I guess it's the old "misery loves company" principle at work.

Just out of criosity, do you intend to do anything with the results you come up with on your poll?

576 posted on 08/23/2002 7:55:45 PM PDT by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Bush has a mid-90s approval rating among Republicans (according to Gallup) AFTER he's supported an amnesty.

Wait till Amnesty is a done deal. Did you know that Bush Senior had poll numbers during the Gulf War that were even higher than the highest numbers that Bush Junior ever got? The only numbers that count are on election day. And the way I see it, Bush Jr. is tracking his dad's political fortunes quite closely.

577 posted on 08/23/2002 7:58:49 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
In your dreams.

Bush Jr. has done a nice job of learning from past mistakes. And as I have said before, you have not taken any conservative that HAS supported amnesty out (Hyde, Sensenbrenner, DeLay - those are the big names).

Heck, nobody's even challenging them. Your beef has not shown up in any of the polls about national priorities. In other words, it's about as relevant as Pat Buchanan has been since the 2000 election.

Take a shot if you feel lucky.
578 posted on 08/23/2002 8:09:45 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
No amnesty. Regular channels, oath.
579 posted on 08/23/2002 8:20:08 PM PDT by fone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
After carefully considering all the rules you laid down for posting a comment, All that I found left to say was : I agree with you 100%, and that's all I really wanted to say on the subject anyway.
580 posted on 08/23/2002 8:20:11 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 921-932 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson