Posted on 08/22/2002 1:39:57 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:08:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
August 22, 2002 -- Vivendi-Universal is bankrolling a new documentary defending anti-American terrorism - and a second media conglomerate, Viacom, is sponsoring the flick's red-carpet premiere in Toronto on Sept. 11.
The film, "11'09"01," consists of 11 Sept. 11-themed shorts, several of which are being described as "stridently anti-American," that a Vivendi-Universal subsidiary commissioned from a team of international directors.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Yeah, right...name one. Moron (not you, Kattracks)
Correct.
It is amazing how liberals instinctively make the wrong choice in all their political decisions. The reason is: they hate a lot more than just America. They hate freedom. They hate freedom of anything.
The dominant liberals yearn for a world that consists of WORKERS (that's you and me) and LEADERS (that's them). The feudal system is good model for society in their mind and since this lines up perfectly with their friends from Islam there is a natural affinity between the two groups. Democracy and freedom are unknown in the world of Islam. To the Liberal establishment they are just a nuisance.
Nothing you can do or say will change their view on this. It is built into their soul. They believe they are the natural rulers of the world and that's just the way it is. Hillary is just the very best example of this that I can think of.
Precisely. And it was a similar tidal wave of idiocy that bounced John Major out of office in 1997. We need only be patient.
It is getting worse for Labour as time goes on, I must say.
Regards, Ivan
I think (and hope) you're right. Perhaps more of us need to follow President Bush's lead, when he says he's a patient man.
I hadn't even read as far as your comment on being patient, when I replied paraphrasing Bush's comment on patience! Perhaps there really is something to that, actually. We've had to put up with nonsense and worse for so long, that most of us have trouble waiting though.
Interestingly, I was listening to I think it was Michael Savage some months ago, when he started talking about Hillary's very favorite form of communism, and it is apparently Leninism, which according to him (I'm no expert on communism) is the sort in which the elite (Hillary et al) get to have all the perks and riches, no economic sacrifices for them, while the rest of us get to be the ones whose backs they walk upon. Lovely.
There is an old saying, "Wait long enough by the river, and the bodies of your enemies will come floating by". Evil has a tendency to turn in on itself and self destruct. Clinton will eventually be diagnosed with some STD and will end his days having to count the numbers of antibiotics he needs to take. Hillary will eventually be an old hag, irrelevant, washed up, bitter, sort of like Bella Abzug. James Carville is already on his way to the lunatic asylum. It takes time, but justice does catch up with these people. Now as for Saddam, yes, it's time to pick up the sword of justice because we can't wait for him to suffer the consequences of all the goats he's molested over the years. ;)
Regards, Ivan
At least here, they're free to be open about it.
It's a movie. And the hot air is just words. Ignore it and them. They are insignificant fleas in the armpit of Liberty.
I like the way you think, Ivan. Maybe the Sicilians are right: Revenge is a dish best served cold.
Well punishment is coming for them. I know the best punishment for the entire Clinton crew - one that will drive them utterly barmy:
Obscurity. ;)
Then hell, of course. ;)
Regards, Ivan
Oh, the bliss of not having to hear about them anymore!
No one will be more pleased than I. I don't remember President Reagan lingering like this when the first President Bush arrived. Nor do I recall President Bush lingering when Weird Bill arrived. It speaks volumes about his character, or lack thereof, that he simply will not shut up.
Best Regards, Ivan
But of course, why would anyone have expected decency from this most recent one we have to deal with?
I didn't expect decency from him. However I did expect something somewhat different - I thought with the loss of power that some of his aphrodesiac effect on the media would diminish. To a limited extent, it has, but not sufficiently to put him in the kind of obscurity that would eventually land him in the Betty Ford Centre. ;)
I may just be being impatient however. ;)
Regards, Ivan
That I think I do understand. Most of the media is left wing, and Clinton is the perfect example of homo sinestra (sinister being the Latin word for "left" by the way).
And this is how: he had the chance to exercise power over others, and snobbishly tell them what to do, yet at the same time he didn't have to extend any self-discipline, and gorged himself on whatever desires he had whenever he had them. He supported infanticide, perversion and mendacity to the hilt; the left hating morality as they view it as being somehow insincere. He was the "new man" they wanted society to produce, writ large. And he was indeed starting to turn the culture - you cannot tell me that deceit becoming acceptable had no role in, say, the Enron scandal.
That is why the media will always love him in their hearts. Their new champion is Hillary. After all, she enabled Bill to be as bad as he was.
Regards, Ivan
You can actually see it turning back now, with the current occupants of the WH leading by example, though there's a long way to go, I'm afraid.
And yes, Hitlery is the new darling, and we have Chelz to look forward to as well...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.