Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

German Sub Sank the Titanic!
National Examiner (tabloid) | Aug. 27, 2002 | Dr. Franklin Ruehl, PhD.

Posted on 08/21/2002 10:12:24 PM PDT by vikingchick

Shocking New Theory!

The Titanic was sunk by a German submarine, not an iceberg, stunning new evidence reveals.

"The one thing people think they know about the Titanic is that she struck an iceberg," says David Roberts, an historian with the Merseyside Maritime Museum in England.

"However, based on survivor testimony, we can't necessarily make that assumption. In fact, when we look at the evidence, the only thing we can take for granted is that the Titanic skimmed past the iceberg, barely making contact with it.

"Subprofiler images of the Titanic's hull have now proven that the damage she sustained wasn't as bad as we first thought. So something else must have been responsible for her loss that night.

"By 1912, the German navy had perfected the U-boat design. At the time of the Titanic's disaster, the political turmoil that would lead to World War I was already brewing. And the Germans had sent U-boats out on patrol in the North Atlantic."

The luxury liner sailed out of Southampton, England on Wednesday, April 10, 1912. Just four days later, she bagan her death plunge to the bottom of the icy North Atlantic off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada, taking more than 1,500 passengers and crew to a watery grave and leaving only about 700 survivors.

"When questioned by a U.S. Senate inquiry panel, several Titanic crew members and passengers testified that they heard explosions deep in the bowels of the ship AFTER it had hit the iceberg," says noted Titanic historian Daniel Cherry.

"One officer said he heard four explosions, like the sounds of a big gun in the distance."

Roberts also said some survivors in lifeboats spotted a mysterious craft in the area, possibly a submarine that had surfaced.

"Many of the survivors huddled in lifeboats that night reported seeing a strange light from a nearby ship, almost like a beam from a searchlight," he explains. "They were encouraged because they hoped the other ship would come to their aid, but it never did.

"The most widely accepted theory is that the ship was the Californian. But to his dying day, her captain Stanley Lord insisted that there was another ship between his and the Titanic.

"The Californian was surrounded by a huge ice field and Lord had ordered that she stay put until daylight. During the night, the sailors on watch, including 3rd Officer Charles Groves, said they saw an unidentified vessel five to six miles from their location. The vessel was there until about 2 a.m., when she moved away from the Californian.

"She was the mystery ship that failed to go to the Titanic's aid. And the reason she didn't was that she had either just collided with the Titanic or used her torpodoes to sink her."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Miscellaneous; US: New Jersey; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: davidroberts; germans; germany; godsgravesglyphs; merde; merseyside; southampton; titanic; uboat; uboats; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: Duke809
It must be true, because Michael Rivero says it is! It's all a U.S. Navy coverup, I tell you! The evidence went down with the Kursk after a Navy submarine rammed it!

(removing tinfoil)

61 posted on 08/22/2002 7:46:11 AM PDT by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick
Ted Kennedy sunk it with a Lincoln, or was it a Buick?
62 posted on 08/22/2002 7:48:15 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick
The titanic went down in 1912 - two years before WW I - there is no way that a german sub sunk the titanic. Okay, everyone, don your tin foil hats.
63 posted on 08/22/2002 7:48:18 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Weikel, I agree with you TOTALLY. The Brits and Americans got suckered into WWI by the Frence, still seething with Gallic envy after Germany's long awaited victory over the French hordes in the Franco-Prussian War.
64 posted on 08/22/2002 7:59:22 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
Jagdwehr, NOBODY in his right mind could possibly believe this idiotic story. Its the most laughable thing I have ever read. Its the sort of rubbish that appears on the front page of Supermarket pulp magazines along with articles like "Woman gives birth to devil", or "Flying saucers planted congressional leaders in the Senate", or "Man sees picture of Christ appear on top of a sausage and anchovy pizza".
65 posted on 08/22/2002 8:03:11 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
Uh...question. Were the Germans operating U-boats in the North Atlantic in 1912? If so, why would they feel the need to sink passenger/commerce shipping two years prior to the start of WWI?

A better question is: What are the chances of a 1912 U boat catching and being able to hit,at night, a ship as fast as this one? Answer: almost zero.

66 posted on 08/22/2002 8:06:34 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick
Vikingchick,

You are all wrong! No one could have suspected the Spanish Inquisition!

jriemer

67 posted on 08/22/2002 8:07:05 AM PDT by jriemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capitan_refugio
Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's remotely true! Facts, schmacks.</Homer>
68 posted on 08/22/2002 8:09:18 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
My AIX

Do you have a browser on that puppy? Hit my site: http://bonefisher.com. There's a stats page that counts by browser type and OS. I have no 'AIX' hits and I'd LOVE at least one.
If not (behind firewall, etc.) that's cool. Thanks.
69 posted on 08/22/2002 8:15:37 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Southack
An Even More Rivetting (British spelling) Conspiracy would be to claim that the hull plates were joined improperly.
70 posted on 08/22/2002 8:15:39 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick
Forget the U-boat. I think that it was that other paragon of journalistic excellence, the Weekly World News, which printed the story of the skeleton clad in KKK robes found wearing a Titanic lifering. Has anyone looked into the possibility that the NAACP was involved?
71 posted on 08/22/2002 8:24:51 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick
BTTT
72 posted on 08/22/2002 8:32:30 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick

"It vas zat damned Leo Decaprio! He vas a mennace undt had to go!"

73 posted on 08/22/2002 8:37:30 AM PDT by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Jagdwehr, NOBODY in his right mind could possibly believe this idiotic story.

I would love it if that were true. Look at all the Freepers who believe there's a face on Mars. I won't even begin to list the other theories the tin hat crowd believes in.

74 posted on 08/22/2002 8:41:58 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick
This sounds like a Clive Cussler novel. And just as fictional.
75 posted on 08/22/2002 8:44:32 AM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taxbilly
McKinny and Mcauliff said it was Bush who ordered the sinking to benefit his friends in the ice maker industry.
76 posted on 08/22/2002 8:46:50 AM PDT by Lee Enfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
"rapidly changing metal temperatures can make things shrink"

Amen brother.

77 posted on 08/22/2002 8:50:09 AM PDT by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick; dighton

I happen to know that it was piracy gone wrong. Stop and think about all of the rich people who were on the TITANIC and what a haul you would make by pillaging it.

The Sinatra movie was just slightly modified to protect the Germans.

78 posted on 08/22/2002 8:57:08 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
The titanic went down in 1912 - two years before WW I - there is no way that a german sub sunk the titanic.

UBoats were on patrol from at least 1906 and in 1912 they might have been practicing for WWI.


79 posted on 08/22/2002 9:03:17 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer; Orual; aculeus; general_re; Poohbah
The Sinatra movie was just slightly modified to protect the Germans.

Frank Sinatra, Virna Lisi, Tony Franciosa.

U-boats, Italians and Germans, World War II Axis.

COINCIDENCE ?????????????

80 posted on 08/22/2002 9:19:49 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson