Posted on 08/19/2002 11:15:10 AM PDT by Gargantua
RASH OF KIDNAPPINGS
The Bitter Fruit Of Liberal Society
and the Homosexual Agenda
When we take God out of our classrooms, we have found that we soon are forced to replace Him with metal detectors, just to keep our kids from knifing and shooting each other to death.
The latest and most bitter fruit our society as a whole must swallow is that of the Liberal push for the Homosexual Agenda. As Dr. Alan Keyes made the point of during the last Presidential debates, when we excuse, and preach acceptance of, perversions of sexual deviancy, we open the door to making all forms of sexual perversion acceptable. After all, who is to judge?
“If it’s okay him to to be queer, then why can’t I be a pedophile?” “…a necropheliac?” “…a hamster humper?”
The point being made here is that all of us have sexual urges. Sometimes they occur in the marketplace, or at our jobs, or on the beach. We as citizens of a civilized and moral society, however, are encouraged and expected to refrain from acting on these urges. Why? Because it is wrong to grab a cute girl at the checkout counter and start feeling her breasts, no matter how tempting they may appear.
Oddly, for the people in our society possessed of the male-female heterosexual norm, there are all sorts of things we cannot do, merely on the basis of right moral consideration. But should an individual desire homosexual deviancy, well then all of us should not only tell them that we think that’s just swell, we have to allow our teachers to preach this Neo-Liberal-Gospel to our kids in our public classrooms.
When our teachers start telling our kids that once taboo lifestyle choices such as homosexuality or lesbianism are now accepted as just “differences of personal choice” which should be respected by all, then we as a society are saying that sexual perversion, and consequently predation, have become a protected right.
The door is open. Our slide down the slippery slope accelerates geometrically.
The problem here is that whether one is a Liberal or a Conservative, we all are forced to take this one up the backside. And that is wrong, it is evil, and it has no place in this country… but for one sad fact: we are all to blame for this hideous re-definition of what America is, and what we all stand for.
It is our job, as a society, to discard the plastic notion of reluctance to speak out due to our having been programmed by the Liberals to respect that which is deemed (by them) to be “Politically Correct.” There is no “Politically Correct.”
There is in fact only right and wrong, and anyone who needs them explained has no place in a serious discussion where the lives and well-being of our children are concerned. Wake up, America. Smell the river. It stinks.
You're reificating. You can look that up in his dictionary if you don't know what that means. Noah Webster's quote is his own opinion. But, it has no basis in fact.
Of course, since you have no arguments, because you have no facts, you didn't address anything else in my post. Typical.
That man is not the origin of rights is the point, not that they came from a supreme being. In the Old World the conventional wisdom held that rights came from the King. The notion that all men were created equal and that rights were an inherent part of being human came along later.
So Jefferson was not a card carrying Christian. So what? Lots of other Founding Fathers were.
And many weren't. But, wether they were or weren't isn't particularly relevant.
Religion is the most powerful and efficacious promulgator of morality.
Especially when people are told they're going to burn in Hell for eternity if they don't behave.
The modern day effort of the Libertarians to supplant religious morality with human reason is a weak effort...
Man has no other means at his disposal for discerning reality than the application of reason to his surroundings.
And for the record, Libertarians do not object to people using their religious beliefs as a moral guide if it pleases them to do so. What Libertarians object to are religious fanatics endeavoring to use the coercive force of government to impose those beliefs on others.
"He studied 199 cases. Of those, 122 male teachers had molested girls, while 14 female teachers had molested boys. He also discovered that 59 homosexual male teachers had molested boys and four female homosexual teachers had molested girls. In other words, 32 percent of those child molestation cases involved homosexuals. Nearly a third of these cases come from only 1-2% of the population."
Bogus findings, the one thing that this fails to take into consideration (the one thing it has to hide to make the numbers work the way they want them to) is the fact that 100% of the people are sexual deviants who molest children, molesting them according to their own particular sexual preference, this makes the study not indicative of the population in general.
In my mind's eye I thought I saw you pack up your pathetic kitbag of insults, sniff derisively in your cute "all-knowing" fashion, and trundle off for dimmer horizons in that great atheist cauldron of heat death, mindlessness, and endless entropy.
One could hope, anyway.
But, no, you're still here pretending to be a conservative while every post you spit forth repudiates the essential moral core of conservatism.
"Gay" publications always fudge the % up to support their agenda. You can't trust any statistics you read in a "gay" publication.
2%-4% seems to be a consensus when dealing with actual statistical data. And no, I won't post any proof here, not worth the trouble. But you have the entire internet to verify the #s. Might I suggest the AMA and APA websites to start.
Stay away from "gay" publications or you'll get skewed data.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.