Skip to comments.
Bush defends planning on Iraq [Don't know what to do about Iraq? Read on.]
CNN ^
| Saturday, August 17, 2002
Posted on 08/17/2002 7:06:50 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: MeeknMing
6) Trust weapons inspections. We all know how good that worked for 10 years, right?

To: JohnHuang2

___________________________

___________________________

Rummy, you tell the Brits to keep sifting the dirt for Osama.
Next up? SADdam ! Let's get him!
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
To: JohnHuang2
very good analogy re: the "Military brains" in this country.
Thanks John.
To: JohnHuang2
Beautifully done. An absolute joy to read. I envy your writing talent.
I'm sure glad that you are on 'our' side. Of course, the truth is also on 'our' side, and the truth combined with your writing talent is a deadly combination (for the libs 8^) ).
45
posted on
08/17/2002 1:50:12 PM PDT
by
DeSoto
To: JohnHuang2
First of all Saddams got to go...and the sooner the better as far as I'm concerned. But lets not be naive enough to believe that once he's assumed room temp. all will be sweetness and light on the banks of the tigris. What we are looking at is(at least) two groups of shia in the south and two groups of kurds in the north all of whom hate each other only slightly less than they hate old sadam. Not to mention Iran to the east looking with lust in it's heart at the shatt el arab(sp) At the top of the gulf.
Turkey who have had /have real problems with the Kurds going back...well a long time. I can just imagine how thrilled they'll be to have a nation full of kurds right next door.
Then there's Syria who'll grab as big a chunk as they can get away with, just because they can.
My point is the real "fun" will begin once Saddams gone.
46
posted on
08/17/2002 2:06:55 PM PDT
by
Valin
To: AmishDude
Thanks, Amish.
Do you have an opinion of the piece?
47
posted on
08/17/2002 3:33:23 PM PDT
by
xzins
To: JohnHuang2
The Scowcroft principle: Don't just do something, stand there!ROTFLMCO, perfect John, just perfect :o)
To: JohnHuang2
this is the best written article I've seen in a year.
That includes Peggy Noonan's work as well.
To: xzins; JohnHuang2
Oh, JH2 hits a homer with this one. There's an old proverb that says "There are none so blind as those who will not see."
John gives them a great big white cane and hits them over the head with it.
To: JohnHuang2
LOL!!! I love your selection of Generals.
Thanks for the laugh and, you are right on target, btw!
Great writing; thanks John.
No? Still not impressed?
Oh yeah, I am. ;-)
To: JohnHuang2
Since Scowcroft is no longer on the White House team, we might actually get rid of Sadaam Hussein this time.
It was his influence (with an assist from Powell) that kept him alive in 1991.
To: ken5050
Thanks, amigo.
To: The Raven
Thanks -- glad you liked it.
To: ImpBill
Morning, friend.
Basically, Gen. Schwarzkopf opined that, from his vantage point, if the mission involves large-scale ground troops, we aren't ready. But he freely admitted that, not being in government nor privy to intel, all he could offer is an educated guess.
To: Aeronaut
Thanks, friend.
To: lsee
Aw, shucks, thanks! =^)
To: winodog
Thanks.
To: xzins
To: Carolinamom
Thanks, friend =^)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson