Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/11/2002 12:09:54 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
Clinton has never quite figured it out, that perhaps just once in a while, it might be better for him if he'd shut the ---- up!
2 posted on 08/11/2002 12:17:51 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; All
Cross-linking:

Bush and Clinton and 911- some facts...

15 posted on 08/11/2002 1:05:41 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
                 Excerpt:  LINK to full article

                 In Sudan, bin Laden appeared to concentrate on
                 switching gears. He reportedly built a road from Khartoum
                 to Port Sudan on the Red Sea, and apparently farmed.
                 Plenty of Afghans came to join him.
                      Bin Laden was certainly close to Egyptian radical
                 groups based in Khartoum — among them, Islamic Jihad.
                 Through an organization he funded in London, bin Laden
                 continued to call for radical change in Saudi Arabia. But
                 after years of continued criticism of the Saudi royal family,
                 his own family disowned him.
                      In 1992, bin Laden claimed responsibility for attempting
                 to bomb U.S. soldiers in Yemen, and again for attacks in
                 Somalia in 1993.
                      By 1994, the Saudis wanted bin Laden out of their back
                 yard. The Americans joined them in putting pressure on the
                 Sudanese to expel him.
                      He left Sudan for Afghanistan in the spring of 1996, by
                 which time he had been identified in a State Department
                 report as “a major financier of terrorism.”

19 posted on 08/11/2002 1:34:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The Clintons have made a career of pissing on all of us while the media just stand around assuring us and one another that its only raining.....one of these days...just one of these days, the find wheels of justice will make it around to them..I can hope can't I!
29 posted on 08/11/2002 5:04:17 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Okay, now I want this to go to the right people, and I want the Republicans to USE this against the Democrats.
30 posted on 08/11/2002 6:29:07 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
. . . though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

If we truly knew that OBL was intending to commit crimes against the US, and since it is certain that any efforts to carry out such intended acts would have involved multiple individuals, a conspiracy rap would have been a slam dunk--so much for the story that we had nothing to hold him on. Moreover, if we had no grounds to detain him, how can Clinton justify signing an order to eliminate his network? Just more Clintonian BS.

33 posted on 08/11/2002 7:15:46 AM PDT by financeprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The Truth Is Out There!

Bump!

35 posted on 08/11/2002 9:19:39 AM PDT by JavaTheHutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Simple picture math of Clinton's refusal to act against Bin Laden:

1993 WTC BOMBING +

MOGADISHU +

KHOBAR TOWERS +

USS COLE =


38 posted on 08/11/2002 10:14:47 AM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The mainstream pressitutes never bothered to follow up on the story cause they're in love with Bubba.
39 posted on 08/11/2002 2:15:17 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"He's lying," Ms. Palmieri, now chief spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee, said of Ijaz's story in May.

How appropriate.

40 posted on 08/11/2002 2:22:06 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
bump
48 posted on 08/11/2002 6:46:42 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Bush Knew, But Clinton Blew It.
51 posted on 08/12/2002 9:06:23 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The Fat Head babbled:

"At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

Ok, Sinkmaster, if we didn't have enough reason to indict the guy, why did you make like you wanted to get him when you lobbed a few cruise missiles his way?

What did he do that was worthy of those missiles but didn't reach the bar of our criminal courts?

Just the thought that this craphead would put an international terrorist mastermind on trial in our criminal courts just boggles the mind. Then again, after they did it with the 1993 WTC bombers, I shouldn't be so surprised.

53 posted on 08/12/2002 6:52:42 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Add this to the very lengthy list of Clinton's negligence while occupying the White House.

Just what in the heck was he doing during those long grueling years? What was his presidency all about? Was he just into fantastical preoccupation with his most spoiled self portrait hanging on the wall of his library? Surely, as presidents go, he perhaps had absolutely no idea what the heck his job duties and responsibilities were. Or, maybe he did in his convoluted manner of thinking and speaking. I remember his infamous GJ testimony, he couldn't even admit that he was the Chief Law Officer of the country.

The negligence, the lies, the economic lies, the bs, the scandals, the sickening stain in the oval office, the adulation, the media elites panting after him, the self-centered self-absorption, the selling of our national security, the lackadaisical attitude towards terrorism and national security, pardons for Puerto Rican terrorists, Marc Rich, and on and on, to today and his disreputably and vividly frantic and vocal constant forcing of himself upon the current political discussion in order to rewrite his personal history is truly a vision of someone gone terribly awry.

58 posted on 08/12/2002 7:23:27 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson