Yes, I did know-I also know that no parent in their right mind (I have two boys and three girls) would allow their daughter to participate in GSA.
In addition to the risk (small) of lesbian seduction, there is a strong, overt anti-masculinity (heterophobia) which can poison future normal relationships even in the absence of lesbianism.
In addition to the risk (small) of lesbian seduction, there is a strong, overt anti-masculinity (heterophobia) which can poison future normal relationships even in the absence of lesbianism.Same with public schools.
Thanks for giving us one more good reason to remove our children now.
Misandrist is the word that you could have used (but as few would recognize it, I'm not suggesting you should have used it).
As for Heterophobia -- I recommend "anti-breeder" instead (at least for a start) for reasons I lay out below.
First of all, it's a reactionary invention to the purely political invention of its complement, homophobia. And both are poorly invented words. Homophobia was invented for sound-bites.
Homophobia was intended to establish a political issue so as to make a relatively small problem seem bigger and more threatening. Because of this, any word you or I coin is almost never going to be seen in the media (like left-winger, and extreme Statist aren't used).
It's poor strategy to invent a counter-word for another invented word that won't be used in the media. (Look how hard it is to get media to use "Pro-Life"). But using a a real word that demonstrates a real threat has a chance of piercing even numbed consciences.
The attack on "breeders" (what the homosexual lobby calls heterosexuals) is never discussed in the media because that would establish an issue; and creating an issue means providing protection for the class represented by the issue. That is definitely NOT what the Malthusian, misanthropic megalomaniacs want to see happen.