How Conservative Is President Bush?| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war. |
Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
How Conservative Is President Bush?
The Cato Institute
By Veronique de Rugy
August 3, 2002
Source
Veronique de Rugy is a fiscal policy analyst at the Cato Institute.
President Bush may be repeating the sins of his father. Although elected on a Reaganesque, tax-cutting platform, the White House has veered to the left. President Bush has signed a bill to regulate political speech, issued protectionist taxes on imported steel and lumber, backed big-spending education and farm bills, and endorsed massive new entitlements for mental health care and prescription drugs. When the numbers are added up, in fact, it looks like President Bush is less conservative than President Clinton.
It makes little sense to discourage one's core supporters prior to a mid-term election. Yet that is the result when a Republican president expands government, which Bush is doing. Also, academic research on voting patterns shows that a president is most likely to get re-elected if voters are enjoying an increase in disposable income. Yet making government bigger is not a recipe for economic growth. After all, there is a reason why Hong Kong grows so fast and France is an economic basket case. But you can't tell that to the Bush administration.
Administration officials privately admit that much of the legislation moving through Congress represents bad public policy. Yet they argue either that everything must take a back seat to the war on terror (much as the first Bush administration treated the war against Iraq) or that compromises are necessary to neutralize issues such as education. But motives and rationalizations do not repeal the laws of economics.
In less than two years, President Bush has presided over more government expansion than took place during eight years of Bill Clinton. For instance:
The education bill expands federal involvement in education. The administration originally argued that the new spending was a necessary price to get vouchers and other reforms. Yet the final bill boosted spending and was stripped of almost all reform initiatives. And there is every reason to believe that this new spending will be counter-productive, like most other federal money spent on education in the past 40 years. Children and taxpayers are the big losers.
Those policy decisions make government bigger and more expensive. They also slow the economy and hurt financial markets -- read the headlines lately? For all his flaws, President Clinton's major policy mistake was the 1993 tax increase. Other changes, such as the welfare reform bill, NAFTA, GATT, farm deregulation, telecommunications deregulation, and financial services deregulation, moved policy in a market-oriented direction.
Perhaps most importantly, there was a substantial reduction in federal spending as a share of gross domestic product during the Clinton years. Using the growth of domestic spending as a benchmark, Clinton was the second most conservative president of the post-World War II era, trailing only Ronald Reagan.
To be sure, much of the credit for Clinton's good policy probably belongs to the Republican Congress, but that is not an excuse for bad policy today. And on one positive note, President Bush has "promised" to fight for partial privatization of Social Security. Yet, so far, President Bush has not vetoed a single piece of legislation. Needless to say, this means it will be rather difficult to blame "big-spending" Democrats if the economy continues to sputter.
Compassionate Conservatism Means Big Government
No To 'Compassionate Conservatism'
"Marvin Olasky, the former Marxist journalism professor who coined the term. But he and George W. Bush are barking up the wrong tree if they think "compassionate conservatism" is going to rally popular support necessary to effect the real change needed to turn this country around."
President Highlights Compassionate Conservative Agenda for Inner Cities
If You Want Increasing Huge Government, Vote Bush
BUSH SPENDING BILL LARGEST EVER
U.S. quietly OKs fetal stem cell work - Bush allows funding despite federal limits on embryo use
Bush Signs Largest Family Planning Bill In U.S. History
Un El día En El la vida de Jorge W. La arbusto
CFR - "I Believe In Free Speech"
Bush Urges Congress To Deliver on Prescription Drugs For Medicare
GOP Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Advances in House - Another Trillion Dollars
Bush and House Republicans Push Legislation For Full Drug Subsidies For Low-Income Elderly
Bush Prepares 'Big-Time' Response To African Famine
Government Spending - War Against The Stock Market
Bush signs debt-limit increase
Bush Pushes Minority Homeownership
Bush's Food Stamp Plan Called Ethnic Pandering
Bush Wants Food Stamps For Non-Citizens
Senate Clears Way For Trade Bill - More Spending
BUSH AND THE BIG GOVERNMENT GOP
Security Bill Loaded With Wasteful PORK
Senate Ok's $31.5 Billion Anti-Terror Bill Loaded With Pork
George W. Bush and Gun Control
Bush Pushes Gore Plan For Orwellian Government
Bush Backs Down From Immunity Demand - Caves Again
BUSH, G7 to pay $20 billion to get rid of Russian nuke stockpiles
George W. Bush - The Global Warming Sell-Out
Dubya's New Deal - The New FDR
Bush Won't Label Arafat A Terrorist
George W. Bush's Terrorist Buddy
"When peoplelose faith in their institutions they trust to enforce the law, justice is no longer possible."
Bush Caves On Airport Screeners
Bush's Latest Srategic Mistake
BUSH: NINE FORMER PRESIDENTS WRONG; CLINTON RIGHT!
CRISIS? WHAT CRISIS? GEORGE BUSH'S NEVER-ENDING DOMESTIC BUDGET BUILD-UP - Father Like Son
Bush Appoints Four More Homosexuals
Dr. James Dobson Criticizes Bush Appointment to the CDC
Bush Pushes $500 Million HIV/Aids Funding For Africa
Bush to Propose Another $100 Million Over Five Years for Education in Africa
Are You Fat? No Problem, George W. Bush Will Help
House Conservatives Budge on Arts Spending
Bush Cheers Government Support For Art
Bush to Name Justice Dept. BUILDING After Kennedy
GOP Leaders Spurn Right in Key Races
Laura Ingraham's analysis of yet another Bush betrayal
Bush decisions rankle conservatives
BUSH PROPOSES LARGEST EXPANSION OF GOVERNMENT SINCE TRUMAN
Bush's Record Calls into Question His Conservative Label
Conservatives Question Dubya's Direction
Conservatives not satisfied with Bush's record
Bush, Ashcroft Run Roughshod Over Bill Of Rights, Study Says
Republicans: Big Government Addicts
A Few Questions For Die-Hard Bush Supporters
Are Republicans losing their constituency?
Ann Coulter: BUSH PAYS HOMAGE TO THE FETISHISTIC RITUALS OF LIBERALISM
Compassionate conservatism is about socialism, not Americanism
Bush is jettisoning his principles for what?
Bush: stop the runaway federal spending and regulating!
Was Clinton More Conservative Than Bush? - Fox News
Bush: A Democrat in Republican clothing?
GEORGE W. BUSH: CLINTON'S THIRD TERM ©
"Another way to make sure that we foster growth and restore confidence is to hold people accountable for misdeeds in the public sector."
George W. Bush - University of Alabama at Birmingham Alys Stephens Center - July 15, 2002.
NOTE: Do As I Say, Not As I Do.
Bush Administration Lawyers Defending Hillary - Gratis
Bush and Ashcroft Justice Dept. Hamstringing Pardongate Probers.
Bill Clinton broke the law and the Republicans let him off the hook.
What we need is the tough Newt Gingrich back.
"As far back as April 7, 1998, then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich was asked on NBC’s Today if he were going to press for impeachment. His response: "No, we don’t have any evidence."
Source.
Al Gore Broke The Law and the Republicans let him off the hook.
Bush Says He Wants to Let Clinton 'Move On'
"Listen, here's my view: I think it's time to get all of this business behind us. I think it's time ... to allow the president to finish his term, and let him move on and enjoy life and become an active participant in the American system. And I think we've had enough focus on the past. It's time to move forward." - George W. Bush.
Bush Won't Dwell On Clinton Affair, "We're Moving Forward"
"B/S, Mr Bush. Clinton is a criminal and a traitor. We demand a thorough investigation and prosecution. Our Republic is dead and our liberty is at stake if the next administration does not clean up this mess for now and forever more. Corrupt politicians must pay the price for subverting our Constitution and using their offices for personal gain."
4 Posted on 01/20/2000 14:17:56 PST by Jim Robinson
A Republic If We Can Keep It - Bush Trashing The Constitution
It's About The Republic, Not The Republican
How Big Is The Government's Debt? - $33.1 TRILLION
There Must Be Some Way Out Of Here
"Not over my dead body will they raise your taxes,"
George W. Bush - SOURCE.
People(satradu) in glass houses should not throw stones, IMHO.
Since you are obviously bereft of the abilty to do simple math, allow me to explain what I was driving at. Since Satadru is still in college, I could have gotten my degrees 21 years ago, or so, and still be under 50. That makes me " Madame Methuselah " and alive when Coolidge was in office ?
Yes, your snipings are childish and I have NOT stoopped to that level. You, OTOH, continue in that vein.
As to " comic relief "; I suggest a visit to the bathroom, and you taking a peek at yourself. :-)
Keep coming with your insults old man, it looks really good. I always thought older folks are cranky, but I never knew how bad things could be. I guess once you have Masters degree, you can do a lot of things.
You keep this up and your picture will appear next to the addage of "people in glass houses should not throw stones".
Oh well it is a free country.
As long as no cats are microwaved I'll be happy.
If your definition of being a big conservative is standing in the corner and sucking your thumb and crying over on how America is so mean to Saddam Hussein, then you have a warped definition, just like Ron Paul.
But like I said before, it's a free country.
BTW, once you know an iota of economics, or mathematics, or statistics, or anything that is important, we will talk about my expertise. If you pull out your left-wing, socialist, protectionist, anti-immigrant hysteria, you will be ass-whopped by some of my students. So, go read some Adam Smith and Ricardo before we can have a discussion.
Wait a minute -- killing Kyoto and the ICC were no-brainers even for a RINO. You want credit for them?? And what is the "etc. etc." all about?
The symbolic "tax cut" drop-in-the-bucket will be negated by 50X due to all the extraneous spending on the Teddy Kennedy "Education" Project, aid for AIDS Africa, Uraguay, the Middle East/Afghanistan, bloating federal payrolls by leaps and bounds, 'Homeland Security', ETC, ETC. For what it's worth , I believe Dubya's pro-life stance is sincere and effective...
One of the ways Dubya can regain some prestige and respect from "real" conservatives will be in whom he tabs to the Supreme Court should he have the opportunity. Until then, he's gonna have a tough row to hoe if he doesn't get tough with borders and federal spending.
How about you get out of your ivory tower and see the real world.
The fresh air may do you some good, although I doubt it, since your penchant for humbleness seems to be near zero.
George W. Bush was born in New Haven, Ct., whilst his father was attending Yale. After graduation, the Bush family moved to Texas ( yes, George W. was a toddler ) and that is his home state.
He attended prep school and college in Mass. ; however, as you should know, where on attends school, does NOT necessarily make that their birth place, nor home.
Maine is where the Bush family has had their summer house, for generations. That, yet again, does NOT necessarily connote one's home state, nor place of birth.
Since all of this information is common knowledge, and you don't know any of it, it would appear that you either 1) can't be bothered enough to pay attention to any candidate's / president's bio. 2) you express opinions based on NO knowledge. 3) Your opinions are invalid, because you don't know enough facts , upon which to base them.
You insult others, claim to have " intellectual heft " and a superior education; yet, you have shown that you have neither.
As for the rest of your reply, it isn't worth what the vice presidency was said to be worth.
And please do not give me the ICC crap. Senate would never pass such a treaty. Are you sure about Kyoto? His EPA thinks differently. You got a tax-cut? You must be on welfare, that you thought your 600 dollar refund was a tax-cut. The people who voted for him will not see it until 2005, and it will vanish when he loses in 2004.
Wow I guess Al Gore would have given us a "non-symbolic" tax cut. Anyway that will go over your head since you and only you, Mr. Conservative of all conservatives knows what best, even when presented with facts.
One of the ways Dubya can regain some prestige and respect from "real" conservatives will be in whom he tabs to the Supreme Court should he have the opportunity. Until then, he's gonna have a tough row to hoe if he doesn't get tough with borders and federal spending.
Uh "real" conservatives don't win elections, they help but the middle has to be wooed to win and that is a lesson the left has learned, but not the "true blue" conservatives, who have to micromanage everything and complain like 2 year olds if a t is not crossed right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.