How Conservative Is President Bush?| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war. |
Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
How Conservative Is President Bush?
The Cato Institute
By Veronique de Rugy
August 3, 2002
Source
Veronique de Rugy is a fiscal policy analyst at the Cato Institute.
President Bush may be repeating the sins of his father. Although elected on a Reaganesque, tax-cutting platform, the White House has veered to the left. President Bush has signed a bill to regulate political speech, issued protectionist taxes on imported steel and lumber, backed big-spending education and farm bills, and endorsed massive new entitlements for mental health care and prescription drugs. When the numbers are added up, in fact, it looks like President Bush is less conservative than President Clinton.
It makes little sense to discourage one's core supporters prior to a mid-term election. Yet that is the result when a Republican president expands government, which Bush is doing. Also, academic research on voting patterns shows that a president is most likely to get re-elected if voters are enjoying an increase in disposable income. Yet making government bigger is not a recipe for economic growth. After all, there is a reason why Hong Kong grows so fast and France is an economic basket case. But you can't tell that to the Bush administration.
Administration officials privately admit that much of the legislation moving through Congress represents bad public policy. Yet they argue either that everything must take a back seat to the war on terror (much as the first Bush administration treated the war against Iraq) or that compromises are necessary to neutralize issues such as education. But motives and rationalizations do not repeal the laws of economics.
In less than two years, President Bush has presided over more government expansion than took place during eight years of Bill Clinton. For instance:
The education bill expands federal involvement in education. The administration originally argued that the new spending was a necessary price to get vouchers and other reforms. Yet the final bill boosted spending and was stripped of almost all reform initiatives. And there is every reason to believe that this new spending will be counter-productive, like most other federal money spent on education in the past 40 years. Children and taxpayers are the big losers.
Those policy decisions make government bigger and more expensive. They also slow the economy and hurt financial markets -- read the headlines lately? For all his flaws, President Clinton's major policy mistake was the 1993 tax increase. Other changes, such as the welfare reform bill, NAFTA, GATT, farm deregulation, telecommunications deregulation, and financial services deregulation, moved policy in a market-oriented direction.
Perhaps most importantly, there was a substantial reduction in federal spending as a share of gross domestic product during the Clinton years. Using the growth of domestic spending as a benchmark, Clinton was the second most conservative president of the post-World War II era, trailing only Ronald Reagan.
To be sure, much of the credit for Clinton's good policy probably belongs to the Republican Congress, but that is not an excuse for bad policy today. And on one positive note, President Bush has "promised" to fight for partial privatization of Social Security. Yet, so far, President Bush has not vetoed a single piece of legislation. Needless to say, this means it will be rather difficult to blame "big-spending" Democrats if the economy continues to sputter.
Compassionate Conservatism Means Big Government
No To 'Compassionate Conservatism'
"Marvin Olasky, the former Marxist journalism professor who coined the term. But he and George W. Bush are barking up the wrong tree if they think "compassionate conservatism" is going to rally popular support necessary to effect the real change needed to turn this country around."
President Highlights Compassionate Conservative Agenda for Inner Cities
If You Want Increasing Huge Government, Vote Bush
BUSH SPENDING BILL LARGEST EVER
U.S. quietly OKs fetal stem cell work - Bush allows funding despite federal limits on embryo use
Bush Signs Largest Family Planning Bill In U.S. History
Un El día En El la vida de Jorge W. La arbusto
CFR - "I Believe In Free Speech"
Bush Urges Congress To Deliver on Prescription Drugs For Medicare
GOP Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Advances in House - Another Trillion Dollars
Bush and House Republicans Push Legislation For Full Drug Subsidies For Low-Income Elderly
Bush Prepares 'Big-Time' Response To African Famine
Government Spending - War Against The Stock Market
Bush signs debt-limit increase
Bush Pushes Minority Homeownership
Bush's Food Stamp Plan Called Ethnic Pandering
Bush Wants Food Stamps For Non-Citizens
Senate Clears Way For Trade Bill - More Spending
BUSH AND THE BIG GOVERNMENT GOP
Security Bill Loaded With Wasteful PORK
Senate Ok's $31.5 Billion Anti-Terror Bill Loaded With Pork
George W. Bush and Gun Control
Bush Pushes Gore Plan For Orwellian Government
Bush Backs Down From Immunity Demand - Caves Again
BUSH, G7 to pay $20 billion to get rid of Russian nuke stockpiles
George W. Bush - The Global Warming Sell-Out
Dubya's New Deal - The New FDR
Bush Won't Label Arafat A Terrorist
George W. Bush's Terrorist Buddy
"When peoplelose faith in their institutions they trust to enforce the law, justice is no longer possible."
Bush Caves On Airport Screeners
Bush's Latest Srategic Mistake
BUSH: NINE FORMER PRESIDENTS WRONG; CLINTON RIGHT!
CRISIS? WHAT CRISIS? GEORGE BUSH'S NEVER-ENDING DOMESTIC BUDGET BUILD-UP - Father Like Son
Bush Appoints Four More Homosexuals
Dr. James Dobson Criticizes Bush Appointment to the CDC
Bush Pushes $500 Million HIV/Aids Funding For Africa
Bush to Propose Another $100 Million Over Five Years for Education in Africa
Are You Fat? No Problem, George W. Bush Will Help
House Conservatives Budge on Arts Spending
Bush Cheers Government Support For Art
Bush to Name Justice Dept. BUILDING After Kennedy
GOP Leaders Spurn Right in Key Races
Laura Ingraham's analysis of yet another Bush betrayal
Bush decisions rankle conservatives
BUSH PROPOSES LARGEST EXPANSION OF GOVERNMENT SINCE TRUMAN
Bush's Record Calls into Question His Conservative Label
Conservatives Question Dubya's Direction
Conservatives not satisfied with Bush's record
Bush, Ashcroft Run Roughshod Over Bill Of Rights, Study Says
Republicans: Big Government Addicts
A Few Questions For Die-Hard Bush Supporters
Are Republicans losing their constituency?
Ann Coulter: BUSH PAYS HOMAGE TO THE FETISHISTIC RITUALS OF LIBERALISM
Compassionate conservatism is about socialism, not Americanism
Bush is jettisoning his principles for what?
Bush: stop the runaway federal spending and regulating!
Was Clinton More Conservative Than Bush? - Fox News
Bush: A Democrat in Republican clothing?
GEORGE W. BUSH: CLINTON'S THIRD TERM ©
"Another way to make sure that we foster growth and restore confidence is to hold people accountable for misdeeds in the public sector."
George W. Bush - University of Alabama at Birmingham Alys Stephens Center - July 15, 2002.
NOTE: Do As I Say, Not As I Do.
Bush Administration Lawyers Defending Hillary - Gratis
Bush and Ashcroft Justice Dept. Hamstringing Pardongate Probers.
Bill Clinton broke the law and the Republicans let him off the hook.
What we need is the tough Newt Gingrich back.
"As far back as April 7, 1998, then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich was asked on NBC’s Today if he were going to press for impeachment. His response: "No, we don’t have any evidence."
Source.
Al Gore Broke The Law and the Republicans let him off the hook.
Bush Says He Wants to Let Clinton 'Move On'
"Listen, here's my view: I think it's time to get all of this business behind us. I think it's time ... to allow the president to finish his term, and let him move on and enjoy life and become an active participant in the American system. And I think we've had enough focus on the past. It's time to move forward." - George W. Bush.
Bush Won't Dwell On Clinton Affair, "We're Moving Forward"
"B/S, Mr Bush. Clinton is a criminal and a traitor. We demand a thorough investigation and prosecution. Our Republic is dead and our liberty is at stake if the next administration does not clean up this mess for now and forever more. Corrupt politicians must pay the price for subverting our Constitution and using their offices for personal gain."
4 Posted on 01/20/2000 14:17:56 PST by Jim Robinson
A Republic If We Can Keep It - Bush Trashing The Constitution
It's About The Republic, Not The Republican
How Big Is The Government's Debt? - $33.1 TRILLION
There Must Be Some Way Out Of Here
"Not over my dead body will they raise your taxes,"
George W. Bush - SOURCE.
But you claimed he posted the same live links about all the people with the same name, didn't you? How did he get all of those DOB's? Want to adjust anything you said earlier? Sorry, but I'm not buying anything that convoluted. He went searching and found the DOB's for everyone in the state of NC by that name registered to vote in order to post info on one of them. Doesn't that seem farfetched to you?
Sorry friend but I staked out my position sometime ago, I am taking the same stance on the pro-Bush side as those that are on the rabid anti-Bush side. 100%. I am not here to convince anyone that Bush is a good president that is an exercise in futility given the idiots that see no difference between him and Clinton or Gore.. I have my own personal differences with Bush but why even voice them? I have just become a very pissed off freeper that is no longer willing to beat his head against a brick wall. I am sick of being called a sycophant, I am sick of being called a BushBOT, I am not going to apologize for supporting a man that is doing the best he OR ANYONE else can do given the circumstance in which he was elected and the state of the public of which he is president. If I am going to be accused of those things then BY GOD I might as well pick a side and fight like hell. I am a VERY angry White Redneck Male and those that don't like it can kiss my....
That's true. I remember hearing Michael Reagan explaining that on his program more than once. Reagan blamed himself for Brady's injury.
sounds like her homepage and a search engine would give anyone the same thing. What makes you think I would want to put any woman in danger or that I even know Howling, let alone dislike her?
No, I'm not worried about what your drunken pal might do. Let him do his worst. I also don't care whether youi would defend him. Every bit of this that you're pushing here is hysterical speculation anyway. The whole point is that you folks who rally to attack Bush's critics are making this whole thing into a huge deal and for what?
Terry admits that she needed Doles DOB to get access to her personal info. I doubt seriously that Reg had the DOBs of all the women displayed on the search as you folks keep insisting.
Not to drag this out any further, suffice it to say that I doubt the word of you folks.
That is about the 3rd time you have asserted that you are a tea-totaler. I think you may be protesting a bit too much. But anyway, thanks for the info I will use it as I see fit.
Isn't it amazing that there can be excuses for Reagan but not for Bush. Go figure.
Although insult is intended by your calling someone a "Bushbot" it is not an insult and although it is meant to sound like "Bushbots" are mindless and follow blindly. the truth is "Bushbots" may disagree occasionally but are glad to have this honorable man in the WH. And we intend to do our best to keep him there.
You really need to quit smoking that "tobacco" out there in Tobacco Country, take a vacation and clear your head.
As I remember it, in your very first post to me you called me a liar. I'm saying that your story is just too much like all these women who swear they saw Oprah the day she went backstage and took off the designer's clothes. What I saw had no clickable links. The one you showed me required the DOB and you all have claimed the links were live for all the names. I find it hard to believe. Take that however you want.
People get all worked up and angry. They remember what soemone said about it and later swear that they witnessed what someone told them when they only heard or read it. That happens and it looks an awful lot like that's what's happening here.
No, her homepage and a search engine would not give you the info his post did. That has been thoroughly demonstrated, and your unwillingness to accept it does not speak well of you. And gee, whatever would give me the impression that you don't like "Howling"? Give me a break.
The whole point is that you folks who rally to attack Bush's critics are making this whole thing into a huge deal and for what?
I believe you brought it up here, Twodees. At least yours was the first post in serious need of correction on the topic. If you had been truthful, perhaps you wouldn't have been challenged by so many.
Not to drag this out any further, suffice it to say that I doubt the word of you folks.
Do you, now? That's rich, considering that you came onto this thread completely mischaracterizing (well, okay - LYING) about what really happened. And now you "doubt" the word of those of us who were there? OH, MY SIDES!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.