Skip to comments.
Police seize rocket launchers, Uzi from home
WTNH ^
| 8/2/02
| WTNH
Posted on 08/02/2002 12:47:22 PM PDT by always vigilant
(New Haven-WTNH, Aug. 2, 2002 2:40 PM) _ Police seized several assault weapons and handguns Thursday from a man who has been served with a restraining order.
The weapons were seized from 55 Emily Road after authorities learned 31-year-old Dominic Simeone, the subject of the restraining order, had registered several weapons.
Included the cache of weapons were two rocket launchers, nine assault weapons including an Uzi and an AR-15, a dozen handguns, 78-boxes of ammunition.
There were also cases marked "explosive" and US Army 30mm ordinance which were seized.
A representative of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms met with New Haven police Friday to discuss the case.
Police say under department policy and state law, people who are issued restraining orders or protective orders cannot possess firearms.
Police say no charges have been filed.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Yep, lets all register them guns.
To: always vigilant
There were also cases marked "explosive"Cases of spray paint? Ant spray? Shaving cream?
2
posted on
08/02/2002 12:50:33 PM PDT
by
Flint
To: always vigilant
Yep, good idea, register your guns. The guy follows the law completely, and has probably been screwed by an estranged wife or gilrfriend, and has them taken. He'll nevr get them back. They will disappear.
and this isn't even news. It says no crages were filed. Shame on the nws service for reporting this.
3
posted on
08/02/2002 12:53:00 PM PDT
by
FreeTally
To: Flint
Right Guard! The first three ingredients are Denatured Alchohol, Isobutane and Propane!
The best fuel to use for Potato Guns!
NeverGore :^)
4
posted on
08/02/2002 12:54:35 PM PDT
by
nevergore
To: always vigilant
Included the cache of weapons were two rocket launchers What kind of rockets? I'll bet the press is calling those estes kits "rocket launchers" to make it sound that this guy is worse than he really is.
To: FreeTally
please - who (really) needs rocket launchers? In Conecticut? I am floored...
To: always vigilant
Included the cache of weapons were two rocket launchers, nine assault weapons including an Uzi and an AR-15, a dozen handguns, 78-boxes of ammunition. There were also cases marked "explosive" and US Army 30mm ordinance which were seized.Just your average Freeper firearms enthusiast!
7
posted on
08/02/2002 1:00:54 PM PDT
by
blau993
To: always vigilant
As I read this is was not the WHAT that was taken but the HOW and WHY they were taken that scared the Sh!t out of me.
Look into "Our lady of Peace" act issued by McCain.
8
posted on
08/02/2002 1:00:54 PM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
To: always vigilant; Vic3O3
Hmmm, rocket launchers, (live or de-mil'd)? Also I'm by no means an expert but I don't believe the Army uses 30 mm ammo. They have the 25 mm gun on the Bradley. The Air Force uses a 30 mm round for the GAU-8 on the A-10 Warthog.
If the rocket launchers were real and he did not have them registered as destructive devices then there is a problem. As to the 30mm, I'm not clear on the possesion laws there. The rest of the stuff is entirely legal to possess. Nothing wrong with either having an AR-15 or an Uzi.
If I was him I'd be suing for a 2nd amendment violation regarding the registration issue.
Semper Fi!
9
posted on
08/02/2002 1:00:58 PM PDT
by
dd5339
To: always vigilant
Police say under department policy and state law, people who are issued restraining orders or protective orders cannot possess firearms. Now what is the difference?
10
posted on
08/02/2002 1:08:01 PM PDT
by
tet68
To: *bang_list
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: dd5339
If I was him I'd be suing for a 2nd amendment violation regarding the registration issue.Exactly whom would you be filing this suit against? There is no government agency/or court that recognizes the 2nd Amendment as valid.
You are obviously a gun nut.
(that was sarcasm)
To: dd5339
30 mm ammo Apache gunship gatling guns.
14
posted on
08/02/2002 1:12:56 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: always vigilant
Police say under department policy and state law, people who are issued restraining orders or protective orders cannot possess firearms.
Wow. Do you have to committ a crime to get a restraining order taken out against you? I thought those things were pretty liberally granted. If so, I'm amazed that is all it takes to remove your weapons. Hopefully this will get challenged and beaten.
patent
15
posted on
08/02/2002 1:17:18 PM PDT
by
patent
To: patent
I'm a CT resident.....there was a law passed a few years back, basically it goes like this.....if you're my next door neighbor and I have a bone to pick with you....all I have to say is "I heard him screaming at his wife last night........he's been actin' wack lately"....etc to the boys in blue.......they come in a day or two later and can take your legally owned fire arms away from you. It happened to my brother.
Connecticut, the "constitution state" Indeed.
To: winnipeg
Are people required to register their guns in the USA?Depends on where you live and what the gun is, ie: since 1934 fully automatic weapons have to be registered with the ATF (don't ask me what I think it stands for). In some jurisdictions all hand guns must be registered, like the Peoples Republic of New York. In others :), like Texas it would be unhealthy for politicians to suggest all guns be registered, lynchings have occurred for less. The Constution, 2nd amendment, guarantees citizens the right to keep and bear arms, but the government is trampling on it as it is many other god given rights. I believe the government would wet itself in joy to have all weapons registered, I also believe they are shaking in their boots at the thought of proposing it. With 80 million gun owners in America, the government must proceed slowly or risk an uprising that could prove fatal for politicians.
Boonie Rat
MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66
To: patent
Wow. Do you have to committ a crime to get a restraining order taken out against you? I thought those things were pretty liberally granted. If so, I'm amazed that is all it takes to remove your weapons. Hopefully this will get challenged and beaten. Yes, that was what the Emerson case was about, remember. You know the one that Ashcroft said that the Supreme Court need not hear.
To: patent
Do you have to committ a crime to get a restraining order taken out against you? Not at all. Restraining orders are, in many states now, a de facto part of any divorce proceeding, and thanks to the Brady Act, confiscating all the firearms belonging to the divorcing parties is now an automatic part of that process. This is what the US vs. Emerson case (recently dismissed by a cowardly US Supreme Court at the behest of the Bush administration's DOJ) was all about.
To: always vigilant
Take 'em if you can find 'em.......
20
posted on
08/02/2002 1:40:32 PM PDT
by
tracer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson