Skip to comments.
Papers Show Bush Played Active Role at Harken
Reuters / ABC ^
Posted on 07/25/2002 5:41:42 PM PDT by RCW2001
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
07/25/2002 5:41:42 PM PDT
by
RCW2001
To: RCW2001
Almost every director of every company in the world plays
an active role, they have a vested interest after all.
To: RCW2001
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH....
3
posted on
07/25/2002 5:43:47 PM PDT
by
Vidalia
To: T. Jefferson
Yep, I'll bet that's why they're called "directors."
To: RCW2001
Oh gosh, the Democrats found a thank you note to Bush which congratulates him for all his fine contributions. They don't say, but it would have been at the time he left the company.
Maybe they ought to attend some of the retirement functions at any corporation. Every employee who leaves is apparently the most critical employee the company ever had. Sheesh.
5
posted on
07/25/2002 5:46:15 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Vidalia
Can't you just see them all knocking each other down now to get on the bandwagon to try and bring Bush down? Ye gads...these people are beyond contempt...they are downright silly little idiots. No kidding. It's really so outrageous...Bush is clean. But...give them an A for trying. NOT!
To: RCW2001
To: RCW2001
I just have to say this: If there had been anything to this, it would have come out back during the presidential campaign. Here in Texas, they were so short on ammo during the primaries that they tried to dredge up some foul deeds between Bush and the funeral industry. Is that desperate, or what? It's all smoke and mirrors.
8
posted on
07/25/2002 5:53:07 PM PDT
by
Clara Lou
To: Clara Lou
Reuters, a pro-Pallie outfit, also stretches to connect dots here that aren't even close.
This article is laughable.
9
posted on
07/25/2002 5:57:52 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: RCW2001
"The information raised fresh questions about the extent of Bush's role as a director at Harken more than a decade ago." Yeah, by who? Lieberman, Daschle, Gephardt, Kerry, Edwards, and their pimps, the NY Times, Reuters, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Peter Jennings, Dan Rather, and Tom Brokaw.
Did I leave anybody out?
Well I have some questions too. When is Rubin going to be called to testify? When is Clinton going to be held accountable for the Marc Rich pardons? When are the Republicans in Congress going to grow a backbone?
10
posted on
07/25/2002 5:58:05 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: sinkspur
Reuters, a pro-Pallie outfit, also stretches to connect dots here that aren't even close.
So, it's only fitting that they are losing money very nicely.
To: RCW2001
The point is, in a year's time after President Bush sold his stock, the stock doubled. Another thing - Haliburton is and was a well-managed company. By attacking the Vice President, the shorts are making more money and the scared little guy is selling like crazy. A long time ago someone asked this question, and I will ask again the shorts and the longs:
Don't you people have any decency left?
12
posted on
07/25/2002 6:10:57 PM PDT
by
Tasha
To: RCW2001
Wow, as director Bush played an active role in business decisions.
That's a shocking revelation.
13
posted on
07/25/2002 6:28:06 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: RCW2001
How many times are they going trot out the same tired lines and write a "new" article as if it's some huge revelation? This is the same nonsense, over and over again. As someone said earlier, "blah, blah, blah.." BIG YAWN.
To: Vidalia
You said,
"BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH" to which I add ,
"Booga Boooga Booooga"
I think people will see this smear attack for what it is...a premature ejac by desperate democrats. Won't work.
15
posted on
07/25/2002 8:15:07 PM PDT
by
YaYa123
To: Jorge
Wow, as director Bush played an active role in business decisions. That's a shocking revelation. Exactly my thought. Can you imagine the outrage if Bush had been a well-paid executive and done nothing? Why, it's tantamount to bribery! They're just shoveling cash at the man so that his father will do them a favor!
Oh. Wait ... he was actually working? Providing good value to the company? Well, that's bad too!
To: Dog Gone
One thing dims as a group don't know much about is being a long time employee who would merit a retirement party.
To: RCW2001
He better have been actively involved - he was a director. Otherwise, he wouldn't have earned his keep. These people will distort any words to make them sound evil. Pathetic. If they only knew it wasn't working on the public, I wonder if they would tone it down any ... NAAAAH!!
18
posted on
07/25/2002 8:29:17 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
To: RCW2001
The title of this article says it all. Dah!
19
posted on
07/25/2002 8:30:51 PM PDT
by
gaffin
To: RCW2001
20
posted on
07/25/2002 8:34:21 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson