1 posted on
07/25/2002 5:41:42 PM PDT by
RCW2001
To: RCW2001
Almost every director of every company in the world plays
an active role, they have a vested interest after all.
To: RCW2001
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH....
3 posted on
07/25/2002 5:43:47 PM PDT by
Vidalia
To: RCW2001
Oh gosh, the Democrats found a thank you note to Bush which congratulates him for all his fine contributions. They don't say, but it would have been at the time he left the company.
Maybe they ought to attend some of the retirement functions at any corporation. Every employee who leaves is apparently the most critical employee the company ever had. Sheesh.
5 posted on
07/25/2002 5:46:15 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: RCW2001
To: RCW2001
I just have to say this: If there had been anything to this, it would have come out back during the presidential campaign. Here in Texas, they were so short on ammo during the primaries that they tried to dredge up some foul deeds between Bush and the funeral industry. Is that desperate, or what? It's all smoke and mirrors.
8 posted on
07/25/2002 5:53:07 PM PDT by
Clara Lou
To: RCW2001
"The information raised fresh questions about the extent of Bush's role as a director at Harken more than a decade ago." Yeah, by who? Lieberman, Daschle, Gephardt, Kerry, Edwards, and their pimps, the NY Times, Reuters, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Peter Jennings, Dan Rather, and Tom Brokaw.
Did I leave anybody out?
Well I have some questions too. When is Rubin going to be called to testify? When is Clinton going to be held accountable for the Marc Rich pardons? When are the Republicans in Congress going to grow a backbone?
10 posted on
07/25/2002 5:58:05 PM PDT by
terilyn
To: RCW2001
The point is, in a year's time after President Bush sold his stock, the stock doubled. Another thing - Haliburton is and was a well-managed company. By attacking the Vice President, the shorts are making more money and the scared little guy is selling like crazy. A long time ago someone asked this question, and I will ask again the shorts and the longs:
Don't you people have any decency left?
12 posted on
07/25/2002 6:10:57 PM PDT by
Tasha
To: RCW2001
Wow, as director Bush played an active role in business decisions.
That's a shocking revelation.
13 posted on
07/25/2002 6:28:06 PM PDT by
Jorge
To: RCW2001
How many times are they going trot out the same tired lines and write a "new" article as if it's some huge revelation? This is the same nonsense, over and over again. As someone said earlier, "blah, blah, blah.." BIG YAWN.
To: RCW2001
He better have been actively involved - he was a director. Otherwise, he wouldn't have earned his keep. These people will distort any words to make them sound evil. Pathetic. If they only knew it wasn't working on the public, I wonder if they would tone it down any ... NAAAAH!!
18 posted on
07/25/2002 8:29:17 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
To: RCW2001
The title of this article says it all. Dah!
19 posted on
07/25/2002 8:30:51 PM PDT by
gaffin
To: RCW2001
20 posted on
07/25/2002 8:34:21 PM PDT by
Pokey78
To: RCW2001
Why, way back when, did Rep. John Dingell ask the SEC to provide his staff with a confidential briefing on its investigation of Bush's stock trade?
Sounds to me that Dingell-berry was getting marching orders from someone who wanted to get at George I via George II.
Trajan88; TAMU Class of '88
22 posted on
07/25/2002 8:42:25 PM PDT by
Trajan88
To: RCW2001
Bush played an active role in Harken Energy Corp's business decisions Holy Cow! The director of a company played an active role in its business decisions?
It's over. This revelation is too much...
To: RCW2001
President Bush played an active role in Harken Energy Corp's business decisions and consulted with the head of the company... This is a concept that may be foreign to DemocRATS and news people but consultants consult.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson