To: FresnoDA
Westerfield didn't do it...(Short version!!)About the only thing it precludes, IF THE JURY ACCEPTS THE DEFENSE WITNESS TESTIMONY (and that is a big if, after the lawyer had to apologize to the jury for "inadvertently" misleading them), is Westerfield dumping the body.
The other evidence is kinda tough to explain away, though.
13 posted on
07/22/2002 3:14:58 PM PDT by
Poohbah
To: Poohbah
Ok...that is another opinion....
15 posted on
07/22/2002 3:16:37 PM PDT by
FresnoDA
To: Poohbah
I agree. The witness does not come off as an "expert" witness ought to, IMO.
To: Poohbah
The other evidence is kinda tough to explain away, though. Reasonable explanations have covered all the evidence so far. Including the FACT that the DOGS did not hit on the MH, so Danielle could not presumably, have been in it for 2 weeks before the dogs searched it.
And now, since Testimony in court has repeatedly backed up the notion that her body was dumped on or very close to the 16th and that she was killed at almost the same time, WHAT OTHER EVIDENCE are you talking about ?
22 posted on
07/22/2002 3:24:02 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
To: Poohbah
The weather here has been very dry for three years. This year was the driest on record less than three and a half inches of rain. The weather was also cold for here with few warm spells. Anyone who thinks they can get that close to a time of death by insect castings alone is full of it. Unless of course the OJ jury has been reincarnated. Just this a-holes actions that weekend are weird enough to point to him. Then of course there is the DNA. Unless of course the DA is just trying to railroad Westerfield.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson