So, you are an entomologist ? An expert? You have spent years studying the life cycles of these particular insects and their invasion of a host for reproductive purpose ?
Unless of course the OJ jury has been reincarnated.
Funny how everyone that gets on these threads and hasn't "SEEMED" to have spent enough time to be informed of all the evidence, all the testimony, KEEPS REFERRING to the OJ CASE. Like that proves something by them using those words.
Just this a-holes actions that weekend are weird enough to point to him.
Do you have some specific facts you wish to refer to that have not been covered in testimony where it was determined that this those actions were normal and reasonable?
I understand your opinion, and that you believe he is guilty. Do you think he should be allowed to have a trial? That he should be allowed to finish it before a jury convicts him ?
Just wondering .