So, you are an entomologist ? An expert? You have spent years studying the life cycles of these particular insects and their invasion of a host for reproductive purpose ?
Unless of course the OJ jury has been reincarnated.
Funny how everyone that gets on these threads and hasn't "SEEMED" to have spent enough time to be informed of all the evidence, all the testimony, KEEPS REFERRING to the OJ CASE. Like that proves something by them using those words.
Just this a-holes actions that weekend are weird enough to point to him.
Do you have some specific facts you wish to refer to that have not been covered in testimony where it was determined that this those actions were normal and reasonable?
I understand your opinion, and that you believe he is guilty. Do you think he should be allowed to have a trial? That he should be allowed to finish it before a jury convicts him ?
Just wondering .
OJ was not all like this case. The OJ jury just couldn't face the fact that a hero of color — the same color as themselves — could possibly have committed the dastardly act with which he was charged. But the physical evidence was overwhelming. The only way past it was to assume it was trumped up. And why would the LA's finest do that? Why, because they're racist pigs! And on what grounds could the jury believe that? Well, the Dream Team got lucky and caught Lt. Fuhrman lying about having used the N-word. Case closed!