Reasonable explanations have covered all the evidence so far. Including the FACT that the DOGS did not hit on the MH, so Danielle could not presumably, have been in it for 2 weeks before the dogs searched it.
And now, since Testimony in court has repeatedly backed up the notion that her body was dumped on or very close to the 16th and that she was killed at almost the same time, WHAT OTHER EVIDENCE are you talking about ?
Dude, they're reasonable only to those who with IQs in the "OJ jurors range."